Skip to main content
Log in

Predicting postoperative facial nerve paralysis by using intraoperative nerve monitoring during parotid surgery

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate a method for predicting postoperative facial nerve paralysis (POFNP) during parotid surgery using intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM).

Methods

We assessed prediction for POFNP by using IONM, comparing between stimulation in the facial nerve trunk and each branch by using facial nerve monitoring. The amplitude response ratio (ARR) was calculated for the trunk/periphery. In addition, we then examined the correlation between ARR and time to recovery of paralyzed branches.

Results

372 branches of 93 patients did not develop POFNP and were classified as group A. Among 20 patients who developed POFNP, 51 branches without POFNP were classified as group B, and 29 branches with POFNP were classified as group C. The ARR was approximately 1 in group A and B. but less than 0.5 in all branches in Group C. When the cut off value of ARR was set at 0.55, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of POFNP diagnosis by ARR were 96.5%, 93.1%, and 96.8%, respectively.

Conclusion

Using IONM during parotid surgery enables easy prediction of POFNP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Raw data were generated at Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University. Derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, Masaaki Higashino, on request.

References

  1. Eisele DW, Wang SJ, Orloff LA (2010) Electrophysiologic facial nerve monitoring during parotidectomy. Head Neck 32:399–405

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sood AJ, Houlton JJ, Nguyen SA, Gillespie MB (2015) Facial nerve monitoring during parotidectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 152:631–637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kinoshita I, Kawata R, Higashino M, Nishikawa S, Terada T, Haginomori SI (2021) Effectiveness of intraoperative facial nerve monitoring and risk factor s related to postoperative facial nerve paralysis in patients with benign parotid tumors: a 20-year study with 902 patients. Auris Nasus Larynx 48(3):361–367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Savvas E, Hillmann S, Weiss D, Koopmann M, Rudack C, Alberty J (2016) Association between facial nerve monitoring with postoperative facial paralysis in parotidectomy. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 142:828–833

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Graciano AJ, Fischer CA, Coelho GV, Steck JH, Paschoal JR, Chone CT (2018) Facial nerve dysfunction after superficial parotidectomy with or without continuous intraoperative electromyographic neuromonitoring: a prospective randomized pilot study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 275:2861–2868

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Grosheva M, Klussmann JP, Grimminger C et al (2009) Electromyographic facial nerve monitoring during parotidectomy for benign lesions does not improve the outcome of postoperative facial nerve function: a prospective two-center trial. Laryngoscope 119:2299–2305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Meier JD, Weniq BL, Manders EC, Nenonene EK (2006) Continuous intraoperative facial nerve monitoring in predicting postoperative injury during parotidectomy. Laryngoscope 116:1569–1572

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mamelle E, Bernat I, Pichon S et al (2013) Supramaximal stimulation during intraoperative facial nerve monitoring as a simple parameter to predict early functional outcome after parotidectomy. Acta Otolaryngol 133:779–784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kawata R, Lee R, Araki M, Takenaka H (2007) Safety and usefulness of an electric knife during surgery for parotid benign tumor: postoperative facial paresis and its risk factors. Acta Otolaryngol 127:966–969

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Witt RL (2002) The significance of the margin in parotid surgery for pleomorphic adenoma. Laryngoscope 112:2141–2154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MH designed the study. MH, IK, TJ, and TT acquired all data. M.H. wrote the manuscript. RK supervised the study. All authors performed data analysis and interpretation and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masaaki Higashino.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Higashino, M., Kinoshita, I., Jinnin, T. et al. Predicting postoperative facial nerve paralysis by using intraoperative nerve monitoring during parotid surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 280, 3855–3860 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-07973-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-07973-3

Keywords

Navigation