Abstract
Purpose
Cholesteatoma on lateral semicircular canal (LSCC) fistula > 2 mm in size is likely to be unmanipulated due to the risk of sensorineural hearing loss. However, the matrix can be successfully removed without hearing loss when it is > 2 mm. The purpose of the study was to evaluate surgical experience over the past 10 years and to suggest the important factor for the hearing preservation in LSCC fistula surgeries.
Methods
According to the fistula size and symptoms, 63 patients with LSCC fistula were grouped as follows: Type I (fistula < 2 mm), Type II (≥ 2 mm and < 4 mm without vertigo), Type III (≥ 2 mm and < 4 mm with vertigo), Type IV (≥ 4 mm), and Type V (any size fistula but with deafness at the initial visit). The cholesteatoma matrix was meticulously manipulated and removed by experienced surgeons.
Results
Only two patients completely lost their hearing after surgery (4.5%). However, the loss was inevitable because their cholesteatomas were highly invasive and there was also facial nerve canal involvement; thus, the bony structure of the LSCC was already destroyed by the cholesteatoma. Unlike these two Type IV patients, Type I–III patients, and those with a fistula size < 4 mm, did not lose their sensorineural hearing. If the structure of the LSCC was maintained, hearing loss did not occur even if the fistula size ≥ 4 mm.
Conclusions
The preservation of the labyrinthine structure is more important than the defect size of the LSCC fistula. If the structure is intact, cholesteatoma matrices lying on the defect can be safely removed, even though the size of bony defect is large.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Copeland BJ, Buchman CA (2003) Management of labyrinthine fistulae in chronic ear surgery. Am J Otolaryngol 24(1):51–60. https://doi.org/10.1053/ajot.2003.10
Dornhoffer JL, Milewski C (1995) Management of the open labyrinth. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 112(3):410–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0194-5998(95)70275-x
Palva T, Ramsay H (1989) Treatment of labyrinthine fistula. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 115(7):804–806. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1989.01860310042019
Chiossone E (1987) Labyrinthine fistulae in cholesteatoma. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 37:128–133. https://doi.org/10.1159/000414125
Hakuba N, Hato N, Shinomori Y, Sato H, Gyo K (2002) Labyrinthine fistula as a late complication of middle ear surgery using the canal wall down technique. Otol Neurotol 23(6):832–835. https://doi.org/10.1097/00129492-200211000-00003
Meyer A, Bouchetemblé P, Costentin B, Dehesdin D, Lerosey Y, Marie JP (2016) Lateral semicircular canal fistula in cholesteatoma: diagnosis and management. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273(8):2055–2063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3775-6
Kvestad E, Kvaerner KJ, Mair IW (2001) Labyrinthine fistula detection: the predictive value of vestibular symptoms and computerized tomography. Acta Otolaryngol 121(5):622–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/000164801316878935
Ahmad I, East DM (2002) Hearing preservation in patients with labyrinthine fistulae. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 123(1):49–52
Sheehy JL, Brackmann DE (1979) Cholesteatoma surgery: management of the labyrinthine fistula–a report of 97 cases. Laryngoscope 89(1):78–87. https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-197901000-00008
Stephenson MF, Saliba I (2011) Prognostic indicators of hearing after complete resection of cholesteatoma causing a labyrinthine fistula. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268(12):1705–1711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1545-7
Portier F, Lescanne E, Racy E, Nowak C, Lamblin B, Bobin S (2005) Studies of labyrinthine cholesteatoma-related fistulas: report of 22 cases. J Otolaryngol 34(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.2310/7070.2005.00001
Yamamoto N, Fujimura S, Ogino E, Hiraumi H, Sakamoto T, Ito J (2010) Management of labyrinthine fistulae in Kyoto University Hospital. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 563:16–19. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016489.2010.489232
Ikeda R, Kobayashi T, Kawase T, Oshima T, Sato T (2012) Risk factors for deterioration of bone conduction hearing in cases of labyrinthine fistula caused by middle ear cholesteatoma. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 121(3):162–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348941212100304
Ritter FN (1970) Chronic suppurative otitis media and the pathologic labyrinthine fistula. Laryngoscope 80(7):1025–1035. https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-197007000-00001
Freeman P (1978) Fistula of the lateral semicircular canal. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 3(3):315–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2273.1978.tb00706.x
Law KP, Smyth GD, Kerr AG (1975) Fistulae of the labyrinth treated by staged combined approach tympanoplasty. J Laryngol Otol 89(5):471–478. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022215100080634
Kobayashi T, Sato T, Toshima M, Ishidoya M, Suetake M, Takasaka T (1995) Treatment of labyrinthine fistula with interruption of the semicircular canals. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 121(4):469–475. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1995.01890040087015
Gacek RR (1974) The surgical management of labyrinthine fistulae in chronic otitis media with cholesteatoma. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 83:1–19
Sanna M, Zini C, Gamoletti R, Taibah AK, Russo A, Scandellari R (1988) Closed versus open technique in the management of labyrinthine fistulae. Am J Otol 9(6):470–475
Motegi M, Yamamoto Y, Akutsu T et al (2021) Imaging analysis for cholesteatoma extension to the perilymphatic space in labyrinth fistulae. Laryngoscope 131(4):E1301–E1307. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.29016
Parnes LS, McClure JA (1991) Posterior semicircular canal occlusion in the normal hearing ear. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 104(1):52–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/019459989110400111
Pace-Balzan A, Rutka JA (1991) Non-ampullary plugging of the posterior semicircular canal for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. J Laryngol Otol 105(11):901–906. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022215100117785
Anthony PF (1991) Partitioning of the labyrinth: application in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Am J Otol 12(5):388–393
Funding
The authors have no funding or financial relationship to declare.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional Review Board of Ajou University Hospital (AJIRB-MED-MDB-21–180) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable standards.
Informed consent
The requirement for informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board of Ajou University Hospital.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, H., Ha, J., Yeou, S.H. et al. What is the most important factor to preserve hearing in lateral semicircular canal fistula surgeries, fistula size or bony structure?. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 280, 4419–4425 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-07958-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-07958-2