Abstract
Purpose
The prognoses of T1a and T1b glottic cancers are still controversial. This study aimed to compare the prognosis difference between the two groups based on the population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER).
Methods
Data for patients with T1a or T1b glottic cancers were extracted from the SEER database. The bias between T1a and T1b glottic cancers was minimized with Propensity Score Matching (PSM), and disease-specific survival (DSS) was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards models.
Results
A total of 5,272 patients were extracted from the database, including 847 patients with T1b glottic cancer that were 1:1 propensity score-matched with patients with T1a glottic cancer. After propensity score-matching, there was no statistical difference in disease-specific survival between T1a and T1b patients, whilst survival was impaired by old age. However, on the multivariate analysis, the T1a stage was associated with improved DSS compared with the T1b stage.
Conclusion
Our analysis showed that T1a glottic cancers didn’t have a significantly better prognosis compared with T1b after PSM. However, the DSS of T1a patients is superior to that of T1b patients in multivariate analysis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data in this study from the SEER database, which was open access for research purposes. The authors were permitted to access the data at the website (http://www.seer.cancer.gov) with the identifier, 12020-Nov2021.
References
Steuer CE, El-Deiry M, Parks JR et al (2017) An update on larynx cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 67:31–50
Observatory GC. International agency for research on cancer. In: World Health Organization. https://gco.iarc.fr. Accessed 1 Sept 2022
Raitiola H, Pukander J, Laippala P (1999) Glottic and supraglottic laryngeal carcinoma: differences in epidemiology, clinical characteristics and prognosis. Acta Otolaryngol 119:847–851
Hoffman HT, Porter K, Karnell LH et al (2006) Laryngeal cancer in the united states: changes in demographics, patterns of care, and survival. Laryngoscope 116:1–13
Megwalu UC, Sikora AG (2014) Survival outcomes in advanced laryngeal cancer. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 140:855–860
Thariat J, Bruchon Y, Bonnetain F et al (2004) Conservative treatment of early glottic carcinomas with exclusive radiotherapy. Cancer Radiother 8:288–296
Hoffmann C, Cornu N, Hans S et al (2016) Early glottic cancer involving the anterior commissure treated by transoral laser cordectomy. Laryngoscope 126:1817–1822
Haapaniemi A, Koivunen P, Saarilahti K et al (2016) Laryngeal cancer in Finland: a 5-year follow-up study of 366 patients. Head Neck 38:36–43
Piazza C, Paderno A, Del Bon F et al (2021) Long-term oncologic outcomes of 1188 tis-t2 glottic cancers treated by transoral laser microsurgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 165:321–328
Syal A, Lott DG, Zhang N et al (2022) Prognostic and treatment differences between t1a and t1b glottic cancer. Laryngoscope 132:2187–2193
De Seta D, Campo F, D’Aguanno V et al (2021) Transoral laser microsurgery for Tis, T1, and T2 glottic carcinoma: 5-year follow-up. Lasers Med Sci 36:507–512
Mannelli G, Comini LV, Santoro R et al (2020) T1 glottic cancer: does anterior commissure involvement worsen prognosis? Cancers (Basel) 12:24
Sert F, Kaya I, Ozturk K et al (2019) Patterns of failure for early-stage glottic carcinoma: 10 years’ experience in conformal radiotherapy era. J Cancer Res Ther 15:576–581
Wolber P, Schwarz D, Stange T et al (2018) Surgical treatment for early stage glottic carcinoma with involvement of the anterior commissure. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 158:295–302
Gultekin M, Ozyar E, Cengiz M et al (2012) High daily fraction dose external radiotherapy for T1 glottic carcinoma: treatment results and prognostic factors. Head Neck 34:1009–1014
Rödel RMW, Steiner W, Müller RM et al (2009) Endoscopic laser surgery of early glottic cancer: involvement of the anterior commissure. Head Neck 31:583–592
Nomiya T, Nemoto K, Wada H et al (2008) Long-term results of radiotherapy for T1a and T1bN0M0 glottic carcinoma. Laryngoscope 118(1417–1421):15
Cellai E, Frata P, Magrini SM et al (2005) Radical radiotherapy for early glottic cancer: results in a series of 1087 patients from two Italian radiation oncology centers. I. The case of T1N0 disease. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 63:1378–1386
Sakata K, Aoki Y, Karasawa K et al (1994) Radiation therapy in early glottic carcinoma: uni- and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors affecting local control. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 30:1059–1064
Peretti G, Piazza C, Bolzoni A (2006) Endoscopic treatment for early glottic cancer: indications and oncologic outcome. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 39:173–189
Marcotullio D, de Vincentiis M, Iannella G, Bigelli C, Magliulo G (2014) Surgical treatment of t1b glottic tumor, 10-years follow-up. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 18:1212–1217
Hirasawa N, Itoh Y, Ishihara S et al (2010) Radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy for patients with t1–t2 glottic carcinoma: retrospective analysis. Head Neck Oncol 2:20
Nomura T, Ishikawa J, Ohki M et al (2020) Multifactorial analysis of local control and survival in patients with early glottic cancer. Laryngoscope 130:1701–1706
Alkan U, Nachalon Y, Shkedy Y et al (2017) T1 squamous cell carcinoma of the glottis with anterior commissure involvement: radiotherapy versus transoral laser microsurgery. Head Neck 39:1101–1105
Rodel RM, Steiner W, Muller RM et al (2009) Endoscopic laser surgery of early glottic cancer: Involvement of the anterior commissure. Head Neck 31:583–592
Steiner W, Ambrosch P, Rodel RM et al (2004) Impact of anterior commissure involvement on local control of early glottic carcinoma treated by laser microresection. Laryngoscope 114:1485–1491
Remmelts AJ, Hoebers FJ, Klop WM et al (2013) Evaluation of lasersurgery and radiotherapy as treatment modalities in early stage laryngeal carcinoma: tumour outcome and quality of voice. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270:2079–2087
Abdurehim Y, Hua Z, Yasin Y et al (2012) Transoral laser surgery versus radiotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis for treatment options of t1a glottic cancer. Head Neck 34:23–33
O’Hara J, Markey A, Homer JJ (2013) Transoral laser surgery versus radiotherapy for tumour stage 1a or 1b glottic squamous cell carcinoma: systematic review of local control outcomes. J Laryngol Otol 127:732–738
Gioacchini FM, Tulli M, Kaleci S et al (2017) Therapeutic modalities and oncologic outcomes in the treatment of T1b glottic squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274:4091–4102
Mendenhall WM, Amdur RJ, Morris CG et al (2001) T1–T2N0 squamous cell carcinoma of the glottic larynx treated with radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol 19:4029–4036
Mucha-Malecka A, Malecki K, Amrogowicz N et al (2021) Prognostic factors in elderly patients with t1 glottic cancer treated with radiotherapy. Sci Rep 11:17717
Stokes WA, Abbott D, Phan A et al (2017) Patterns of care for patients with early-stage glottic cancer undergoing definitive radiation therapy: a national cancer database analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 98:1014–1021
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.
Ethical approval
Not required.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Fang, L., Tuohuti, A., Shi, L. et al. Comparison of prognostic and treatment between T1a and T1b glottic cancer: a propensity score-matched SEER database analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 280, 3313–3322 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-07953-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-07953-7