Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of factors influencing the olfactory bulb volume in patients with post-viral olfactory dysfunction

  • Rhinology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the factors influencing the volume of the olfactory bulb (OB) in patients with post-viral olfactory dysfunction (PVOD).

Methods

We collected 92 olfactory bulb volumes from patients with PVOD who underwent a sinus computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan of the head and collected clinical information including gender, age, disease course, minimal cross-sectional area, nasal airway resistance, and olfactory function. OB volume was measured in MRI and the scans were evaluated according to the Lund-Mackay (LM) scoring system.

Results

Male patients with PVOD had a larger OB volume (β = 0.284, P < 0.05). OB volume was smaller in patients with a longer course of olfactory dysfunction (β = − 0.254, P < 0.05). According to the LM scoring system, patients with a higher anterior ethmoidal sinus score had smaller OB volume (β = − 0.476, P < 0.05).

Conclusions

The study revealed that gender, disease course, and the score of anterior ethmoidal sinusitis can affect the OB volume in patients with PVOD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The anonymised data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Hura N et al (2020) Treatment of post-viral olfactory dysfunction: an evidence-based review with recommendations. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 10(9):1065–1086

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu DT, et al. (2020) Individual importance of olfaction decreases with duration of smell loss. Rhinol J.

  3. Mazal PP, Haehner A, Hummel T (2016) Relation of the volume of the olfactory bulb to psychophysical measures of olfactory function. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273(1):1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rebholz H et al (2020) Loss of olfactory function-early indicator for COVID-19, other viral infections and neurodegenerative disorders. Front Neurol 11:569333

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Carignan A et al (2020) Anosmia and dysgeusia associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection: an age-matched case-control study. CMAJ 192(26):E702–E707

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Guo Y et al (2022) Prognostic value of olfactory bulb volume in patients with post-viral olfactory dysfunction. Lin Chung Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi 36(1):8–13

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yao L et al (2018) Olfactory cortex and olfactory bulb volume alterations in patients with post-infectious olfactory loss. Brain Imaging Behav 12(5):1355–1362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Koenigkam-Santos M et al (2011) Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the olfactory system in Kallmann syndrome: correlation with a clinical smell test. Neuroendocrinology 94(3):209–217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Seubert J et al (2013) Orbitofrontal cortex and olfactory bulb volume predict distinct aspects of olfactory performance in healthy subjects. Cereb Cortex 23(10):2448–2456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shehata EM et al (2018) Olfactory bulb neuroplasticity: a prospective cohort study in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Clin Otolaryngol 43(6):1528–1534

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lund VJ, Mackay IS (1993) Staging in rhinosinusitus. Rhinology 31(4):183–184

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hummel T et al (2015) Volume of olfactory bulb and depth of olfactory sulcus in 378 consecutive patients with olfactory loss. J Neurol 262(4):1046–1051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rombaux P et al (2006) Olfactory function and olfactory bulb volume in patients with postinfectious olfactory loss. Laryngoscope 116(3):436–439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu J et al (2016) Gender difference in Chinese adults with post-viral olfactory disorder: a hospital-based study. Acta Otolaryngol 136(9):976–981

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Duncan HJ, Seiden AM (1995) Long-term follow-up of olfactory loss secondary to head trauma and upper respiratory tract infection. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 121(10):1183–1187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gwaltney JJ et al (1994) Computed tomographic study of the common cold. N Engl J Med 330(1):25–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hansen AG et al (2014) Incidental findings in MRI of the paranasal sinuses in adults: a population-based study (HUNT MRI). BMC ear, nose and throat disorders 14(1):13–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yousefi F et al (2022) Magnetic resonance imaging study of incidental findings in the paranasal sinuses and ostiomeatal complex. Imaging Sci Dent 52(1):11–18

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Ozdemir M, Kavak RP (2019) Season, age and sex-related differences in incidental magnetic resonance imaging findings of paranasal sinuses in adults. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol 57(2):61–67

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Nazri M et al (2013) Incidental detection of sinus mucosal abnormalities on CT and MRI imaging of the head. Quant Imaging Med Surg 3(2):82–88

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Soler ZM et al (2010) Ethmoid histopathology does not predict olfactory outcomes after endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol Allergy 24(4):281–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yamagishi M et al (1989) Effect of surgical treatment of olfactory disturbance caused by localized ethmoiditis. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 14(5):405–409

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the participants of the study.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the National Key R&D Program of China (2019YFE0116000, 2020YFC2005200).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhifu Sun or Zhan Yu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, C., Gao, Y., Feng, Y. et al. Assessment of factors influencing the olfactory bulb volume in patients with post-viral olfactory dysfunction. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 280, 3737–3743 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-07932-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-07932-y

Keywords

Navigation