Skip to main content
Log in

Letter to the Editor re: Intra and interobserver agreement of the Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity Scale (DIGEST) in fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES): the importance of observer-tailored training

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Letter to the Editor to this article was published on 21 April 2023

The Original Article was published on 27 January 2023

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Data availability

There is no data analyzed to make available.

References

  1. Simon SR, Wieland MWM, Hendriks C et al (2023) Intra and interobserver agreement of the Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity Scale (DIGEST) in fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES): the importance of observer-tailored training. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol (Online ahead of print)

  2. Barbon CE, Warneke C, Soltanalizadeh B, Schelling B, Rogus-Pulia N, Cunningham L, Coyle JL, Levesque-Boissonneault C, Alvarez C, Hutcheson KA (2022) Reliability and confidence of dynamic imaging grade of swallowing toxicity (DIGEST) rating among research and clinical speech pathologists: a multi-site study. In: Presented at the 30th annual meeting of the dysphagia research society

  3. Hutcheson KA, Barrow MP, Barringer DA et al (2017) Dynamic imaging grade of swallowing toxicity (DIGEST): scale development and validation. Cancer 123:62–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Starmer HM, Arrese L, Langmore S et al (2021) Adaptation and validation of the dynamic imaging grade of swallowing toxicity for flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing: DIGEST-FEES. J Speech Lang Hear Res 64:1802–1810

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hutcheson KA, Barbon CEA, Alvarez CP, Warneke CL (2022) Refining measurement of swallowing safety in the dynamic imaging grade of swallowing toxicity (DIGEST) criteria: validation of DIGEST version 2. Cancer 128:1458–1466

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pisegna JM, Kaneoka A, Leonard R, Langmore SE (2018) Rethinking residue: determining the perceptual continuum of residue on FEES to enable better measurement. Dysphagia 33:100–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pisegna JM, Borders JC, Kaneoka A, Coster WJ, Leonard R, Langmore SE (2018) Reliability of untrained and experienced raters on FEES: rating overall residue is a simple task. Dysphagia 33:645–654

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pisegna JM, Kaneoka A, Coster WJ, Leonard R, Langmore SE (2020) Residue ratings on FEES: trends for clinical application of residue measurement. Dysphagia 35:834–842

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hutcheson KA (2020) DIGEST™ training manual. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katherine A. Hutcheson.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hutcheson, K.A., Starmer, H. Letter to the Editor re: Intra and interobserver agreement of the Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity Scale (DIGEST) in fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES): the importance of observer-tailored training. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 280, 3045–3046 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-07902-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-07902-4

Navigation