Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A deep learning-based model predicts survival for patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a large population-based study

  • Laryngology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To assess the performance of DeepSurv, a deep learning-based model in the survival prediction of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

Methods

In this large population-based study, we developed and validated a deep learning survival neural network using pathologically diagnosed patients with LSCC from the SEER database between January 2010 and December 2018. Totally 13 variables were included in this network, including patients baseline characteristics, stage, grade, site, tumor extension and treatment details. Based on the total risk score derived from this algorithm, a three-knot restricted cubic spline was plotted to exhibit the difference of survival benefits from two treatment modalities.

Results

Totally 6316 patients with LSCC were included in the study, of which 4237 cases diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 were selected as the development cohort, and the rest (2079 cases diagnosed from 2016 to 2018) were the validation cohort. A state-of-the-art deep learning-based model based on 23 features (i.e., 13 variables) was generated, which showed more superior performance in the prediction of overall survival (OS) than the tumor, node, and metastasis (TNM) staging system (C-index for DeepSurv vs TNM staging = 0.71; 95% CI 0.69–0.74 vs 0.61; 95% CI 0.60–0.63). Interestingly, a significantly nonlinear association between total risk score and treatment effectiveness was observed. When the total risk score ranges 0.1–1.5, surgical treatment brought more survival benefits than nonsurgical one for LSCC patients, especially in 70.5% of patients staged III–IV.

Conclusions

The deep learning-based model shows more potential benefits in survival estimation for patients with LSCC, which may potentially serve as an auxiliary approach to provide reliable treatment recommendations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nocini R, Sanchis-Gomar F, Lippi G (2019) Physical activity and laryngeal cancer. Ann Transl Med 7(23):791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zeng H, Huang Y, Chen L, Li H, Ma X (2020) Exploration and validation of the effects of robust co-expressed immune-related genes on immune infiltration patterns and prognosis in laryngeal cancer. Int Immunopharmacol 85:106622

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Elicin O, Giger R (2020) Comparison of current surgical and non-surgical treatment strategies for early and locally advanced stage glottic laryngeal cancer and their outcome. Cancers (Basel) 12(3):732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Petersen JF, Stuiver MM, Timmermans AJ, Chen A, Zhang H, O’Neill JP, Deady S, Van der Poorten V, Meulemans J, Wennerberg J et al (2018) Development and external validation of a risk-prediction model to predict 5-year overall survival in advanced larynx cancer. Laryngoscope 128(5):1140–1145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Misono S, Marmor S, Yueh B, Virnig BA (2014) Treatment and survival in 10,429 patients with localized laryngeal cancer: a population-based analysis. Cancer 120(12):1810–1817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Edge SB, Compton CC (2010) The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol 17(6):1471–1474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen L, Lin G, Qian J, Chen Z, Wu X, Lin J, Chen Y, Chen Q, Zhuang Z, Hong Y et al (2021) A dynamic prognostic nomogram to predict the benefit from surgical treatment modality for patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 43(7):2148–2158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bozec A, Culie D, Poissonnet G, Dassonville O (2020) Current role of total laryngectomy in the era of organ preservation. Cancers (Basel) 12(3):584

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lechien JR, Fakhry N, Saussez S, Chiesa-Estomba CM, Chekkoury-Idrissi Y, Cammaroto G, Melkane AE, Barillari MR, Crevier-Buchman L, Ayad T et al (2020) Surgical, clinical and functional outcomes of transoral robotic surgery for supraglottic laryngeal cancers: a systematic review. Oral Oncol 109:104848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Datema FR, Ferrier MB, Vergouwe Y, Moya A, Molenaar J, Piccirillo JF, Baatenburg de Jong RJ (2013) Update and external validation of a head and neck cancer prognostic model. Head Neck 35(9):1232–1237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cui J, Wang L, Tan G, Chen W, He G, Huang H, Chen Z, Yang H, Chen J, Liu G (2020) Development and validation of nomograms to accurately predict risk of recurrence for patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: cohort study. Int J Surg 76:163–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen L, Wang H, Zeng H, Zhang Y, Ma X (2020) Evaluation of CT-based radiomics signature and nomogram as prognostic markers in patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Imaging 20(1):28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Katzman JL, Shaham U, Cloninger A, Bates J, Jiang T, Kluger Y (2018) DeepSurv: personalized treatment recommender system using a Cox proportional hazards deep neural network. BMC Med Res Methodol 18(1):24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. She Y, Jin Z, Wu J, Deng J, Zhang L, Su H, Jiang G, Liu H, Xie D, Cao N et al (2020) Development and validation of a deep learning model for non-small cell lung cancer survival. JAMA Netw Open 3(6):e205842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Adeoye J, Hui L, Koohi-Moghadam M, Tan JY, Choi SW, Thomson P (2022) Comparison of time-to-event machine learning models in predicting oral cavity cancer prognosis. Int J Med Inform 157:104635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Byun SS, Heo TS, Choi JM, Jeong YS, Kim YS, Lee WK, Kim C (2021) Deep learning based prediction of prognosis in nonmetastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Sci Rep 11(1):1242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Howard FM, Kochanny S, Koshy M, Spiotto M, Pearson AT (2020) Machine learning-guided adjuvant treatment of head and neck cancer. JAMA Netw Open 3(11):e2025881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. El Sharouni MA, Ahmed T, Varey AHR, Elias SG, Witkamp AJ, Sigurdsson V, Suijkerbuijk KPM, van Diest PJ, Scolyer RA, van Gils CH et al (2021) Development and validation of nomograms to predict local, regional, and distant recurrence in patients with thin (T1) melanomas. J Clin Oncol 39(11):1243–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang HS, Li B, Liu SH, Ao M (2021) Nomogram model for predicting postoperative survival of patients with stage IB-IIA cervical cancer. Am J Cancer Res 11(11):5559–5570

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zheng X, Guo K, Wasan HS, Ruan S (2021) A population-based study: how to identify high-risk T1 gastric cancer patients? Am J Cancer Res 11(4):1463–1479

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gu J, Zuo Z, Sun L, Li L, Zhao N (2020) Prognostic factors for laryngeal sarcoma and nomogram development for prediction: a retrospective study based on SEER database. Ann Transl Med 8(8):545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Balachandran VP, Gonen M, Smith JJ, DeMatteo RP (2015) Nomograms in oncology: more than meets the eye. Lancet Oncol 16(4):e173–e180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhu X, Heng Y, Zhou L, Zhang M, Li W, Tao L (2020) Survival prediction and treatment strategies for patients with advanced laryngeal carcinoma: a population-based study. Int J Clin Oncol 25(8):1483–1491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Forastiere AA, Goepfert H, Maor M, Pajak TF, Weber R, Morrison W, Glisson B (2003) Concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy for organ preservation in advanced laryngeal cancer. N Engl J Med 349(22):2091–2098

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was funded by the Non-profit Central Research Institute Fund of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences under Grant 2017PT32013.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinyu Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liao, F., Wang, W. & Wang, J. A deep learning-based model predicts survival for patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a large population-based study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 280, 789–795 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07627-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07627-w

Keywords

Navigation