Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effect of type 1 diabetes mellitus on voice in pediatric patients

  • Laryngology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this prospective case–control study was to determine the effect on the voice of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) in paediatric patients.

Materials and methods

The study included patients aged 6–18 years followed up for at least 1 year because of T1DM, and a control group of age and gender-matched healthy volunteers. Following an Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) examination, all subjects underwent flexible endoscopic laryngeal examination. Fasting venous blood samples were taken in the morning for the examination of fasting blood glucose (FBG), HgbA1C, and kidney, liver, and thyroid function tests. Data were recorded from the patient files of age, gender, comorbidities, and the development of diabetes-related complications. Voice recordings were taken and the Voice Handicap Index (VHI)-10 form was completed. The patients and control group were compared in respect of the parameters of fundamental frequency, jitter, shimmer, and acoustic voice quality index (AVQI).

Results

Evaluation was made of 64 children and adolescents as 32 in the patient group (Group 1) and 32 healthy control subjects (Group 2). Group 1 comprised 17 females and 15 males with a mean age of 12.75 ± 3.23 years. Group 2 comprised 17 females and 15 males with a mean age of 12.75 ± 3.33 years. In Group 1, mean disease duration was 5.21 ± 3.17 years (range, 1–13 years), the FBG value was mean 216.6 ± 122.3 mg/dl, mean HgbA1c was 10.7 ± 2.8, as ≤ 7 in 4 patients, 7–9 in 4, and > 9 in 24. Maximum phonation time (MPT) was determined as 10.66 ± 3.6 secs in Group 1 and 12.11 ± 4.43 in Group 2. VHI was determined as 2.33 ± 3 in Group 1 and 2.31 ± 2.77 in Group 2. No statistically significant difference was determined between the groups was determined in respect of acoustic analysis, perturbation parameters, AVQI and body mass index.

Conclusions

This study is the first to have investigated the effects of T1DM on the voice in paediatric patients. The study results showed that the AVQI value was higher in the patient group but not to a statistically significant level. Therefore, there is a need for further studies with larger samples. The current study can be of guidance for further studies in this field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Availability of data and materials

The data sets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Cheung CY, Ma MK, Chak WL, Tang SCW (2017) Cancer risk in patients with diabetic nephropathy: a retrospective cohort study in Hong Kong. Medicine 96(38):e8077. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008077

  2. Saghiri MA, Vakhnovetsky A, Vakhnovetsky J (2022) Scoping review of the relationship between diabetes and voice quality. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 185:109782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2022.109782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ziegler R, Neu A (2018) Diabetes in childhood and adolescence: a guideline-based approach to diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. Dtsch Arztebl Int 115(9):146. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2018.0146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Group UPDS (1998) Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 352(9131):837–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(98)07019-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gölaç H, Atalik G, Türkcan AK, Yilmaz M (2021) Disease related changes in vocal parameters of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. https://doi.org/10.1080/14015439.2021.1917653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hamdan A-L, Jabbour J, Nassar J, Dahouk I, Azar ST (2012) Vocal characteristics in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269(5):1489–1495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-1933-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pinyopodjanard S, Suppakitjanusant P, Lomprew P, Kasemkosin N, Chailurkit L, Ongphiphadhanakul B (2019) Instrumental acoustic voice characteristics in adults with type 2 diabetes. J Voice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.07.003

  8. Kabadi UM (1988) Unilateral vocal cord palsy in a diabetic patient. Postgrad Med 84(4):53–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.1988.11700420

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ravi R, Gunjawate DR (2019) Effect of diabetes mellitus on voice: a systematic review. Pract Diab 36(5):177–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/pdi.2240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hamdan A-L, Kurban Z, Azar ST (2013) Prevalence of phonatory symptoms in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Acta Diabetol 50(5):731–736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-012-0392-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar KH, Garg A, Chandra NA, Singh S, Datta R (2016) Voice and endocrinology. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 20(5):590. https://doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.190523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tüzüner A, Çiyiltepe M, Balo E, Çağli A (2017) Reliability and validity of the Turkish children’s voice handicap index-10 (TR-CVHI-10). Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 96:131–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.03.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Association AD (2020) 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: standards of medical care in diabetes 2020. Diabetes Care 43(Supplement 1):S14–S31. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-S002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yeşilli-Puzella G, Tadıhan-Özkan E, Maryn Y (2020) Validation and test–retest reliability of acoustic voice quality ındex version 02.06 in the Turkish Language. J Voice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.08.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dogan M, Midi I, Yazici MA, Kocak I, Günal D, Sehitoglu MA (2007) Objective and subjective evaluation of voice quality in multiple sclerosis. J Voice 21(6):735–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2006.05.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sagiroglu S, Kurtul N (2020) The effect of supraclavicular radiotherapy on acoustic voice quality ındex (AVQI), spectral amplitude and perturbation values. J Voice 34(4):649e7-e13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vinik AI, Nevoret M-L, Casellini C, Parson H (2013) Diabetic neuropathy. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 42(4):747–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecl.2013.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wherrett DK, Ho J, Huot C, Legault L, Nakhla M, Rosolowsky E (2018) Type 1 diabetes in children and adolescents. Can J Diabetes 42:S234–S246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjd.2017.10.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cho YH, Craig ME, Hing S, Gallego PH, Poon M, Chan A et al (2011) Microvascular complications assessment in adolescents with 2-to 5-yr duration of type 1 diabetes from 1990 to 2006. Pediatr Diab 12(8):682–689. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-5448.2011.00762.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Dyck PJ, Kratz K, Karnes J, Litchy WJ, Klein R, Pach J et al (1993) The prevalence by staged severity of various types of diabetic neuropathy, retinopathy, and nephropathy in a population-based cohort: the Rochester Diabetic Neuropathy Study. Neurology 43(4):817. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.43.4.817

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Reynolds V, Buckland A, Bailey J, Lipscombe J, Nathan E, Vijayasekaran S et al (2012) Objective assessment of pediatric voice disorders with the acoustic voice quality index. J Voice 26(5):672e1-e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pinyopodjanard S, Suppakitjanusant P, Lomprew P, Kasemkosin N, Chailurkit L, Ongphiphadhanakul B (2021) Instrumental acoustic voice characteristics in adults with type 2 diabetes. J Voice 35(1):116–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Maryn Y, De Bodt M, Roy N (2010) The acoustic voice quality Index: toward improved treatment outcomes assessment in voice disorders. J Commun Disord 43(3):161–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2009.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Uloza V, Latoszek BBV, Ulozaite-Staniene N, Petrauskas T, Maryn Y (2018) A comparison of dysphonia severity ındex and acoustic voice quality ındex measures in differentiating normal and dysphonic voices. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 275(4):949–958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-4903-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Faham M, Laukkanen A-M, Ikävalko T, Rantala L, Geneid A, Holmqvist-Jämsén S et al (2021) Acoustic voice quality index as a potential tool for voice screening. J Voice 35(2):226–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.08.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Latoszek BB, Ulozaitė-Stanienė N, Maryn Y, Petrauskas T, Uloza V (2019) The influence of gender and age on the acoustic voice quality index and dysphonia severity index: a normative study. J Voice 33(3):340–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.11.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bainbridge KE, Roy N, Losonczy KG, Hoffman HJ, Cohen SM (2017) Voice disorders and associated risk markers among young adults in the United States. Laryngoscope 127(9):2093–2099. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hamdan A-L, Jabbour J, Barazi R, Korban Z, Azar ST (2013) Prevalence of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Voice 27(4):495–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.07.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang X, Pitchumoni C, Chandrarana K, Shah N (2008) Increased prevalence of symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux diseases in type 2 diabetics with neuropathy. World J Gastroenterol 14(5):709. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.14.709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lechien JR, Finck C, de Araujo PC, Huet K, Delvaux V, Piccaluga M et al (2017) Voice outcomes of laryngopharyngeal reflux treatment: a systematic review of 1483 patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274(1):1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-3984-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irfan Kara.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

Patients signed informed consent regarding the publication of their data.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kara, I., Temiz, F., Doganer, A. et al. The effect of type 1 diabetes mellitus on voice in pediatric patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 280, 269–275 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07543-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07543-z

Keywords

Navigation