Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of endoscopic vs microscopic ossiculoplasty: a study of 157 consecutive cases

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The relatively new technique of trans-canal endoscopic ear surgery (TEES) when compared to microsurgery for ossiculoplasty has advantages of better visualization and no external incision but also has the disadvantage of being a one-handed procedure. Our study aimed to compare audiometric outcomes following ossiculoplasty performed via TESS with results of microsurgery.

Materials and methods

Data from a prospective audit of 157 consecutive patients who underwent ossiculoplasty by a single otologist from 2009 to 2018 was analyzed. TEES was introduced in the department in 2014; therefore, all patients before this period underwent microsurgery. Patients were classified by surgical approach, TEES, or microsurgery. Audiological outcomes were recorded at 3 and 12 months postoperatively and compared to pre-operative levels. Other variables included were the condition of stapes and reconstruction material used.

Results

Of the 157 cases, 50 were TEES and 107 were microsurgery (81 microscope only and 27 combined with endoscope). There was statistically significant improvement (p < 0.001) in AC (43.4 dB pre-operatively, 36.2 dB postoperatively), BC (20.3 dB pre-operatively, 17.6 dB postoperatively), and ABG (21.8 dB pre-operatively, 16.7 dB postoperatively) in the total cohort.

Both groups achieved an ABG better than 20 dB; 72% in TEES, 73% in the microscopic group, and there was no significant difference. There was no change in hearing at 12 months when compared to 3 months. No statistically significant difference was noted based on stapes condition, type of material used for ossiculoplasty, or tympanic membrane graft.

Conclusion

TEES is safe and as effective as microsurgery in ossiculoplasty with possibly much less pain and morbidity.

Level of evidence

3.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bennett ML, Zhang D, Labadie RF, Noble JH (2016) Comparison of middle ear visualization with endoscopy and microscopy. Otol Neurotol 37(4):362–366. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kobayashi T, Gyo K, Komori M, Hyodo M (2015) Efficacy and safety of transcanal endoscopic ear surgery for congenital cholesteatomas: a preliminary report. Otol Neurotol 36(10):1644–1650. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anzola JF, Nogueira JF (2016) Endoscopic techniques in tympanoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 49(5):1253–1264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2016.05.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ryan PJ, Patel NP (2020) Endoscopic management of pediatric cholesteatoma (Erratum in: J Otol. 2020;15(4):179). J Otol 15(1):17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joto.2018.11.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhardwaj A, Anant A, Bharadwaj N, Gupta A, Gupta S (2018) Stapedotomy using a 4 mm endoscope: any advantage over a microscope? J Laryngol Otol 132(9):807–811. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215118001548

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Marchioni D, Alicandri-Ciufelli M, Rubini A, Masotto B, Pavesi G, Presutti L (2017) Exclusive endoscopic transcanal transpromontorial approach: a new perspective for internal auditory canal vestibular schwannoma treatment. J Neurosurg 126(1):98–105. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.11.JNS15952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, Inc. (1995) Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of results of treatment of conductive hearing loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 113(3):186–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0194-5998(95)70103-6

  8. Potsangbam DS, Akoijam BA (2019) Endoscopic transcanal autologous cartilage ossiculoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 71(1):54–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-018-1518-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Caloway CL, Basonbul RA, Ronner EA, Tolisano AM, Zhu AW, Suresh H, Lee DJ, Isaacson B, Cohen MS (2020) Pediatric endoscopic ossiculoplasty following surgery for chronic ear disease. Laryngoscope 130(12):2896–2899. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.28526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Das A, Mitra S, Ghosh D, Sengupta A (2020) Endoscopic ossiculoplasty: Is there any edge over the microscopic technique? Laryngoscope 130(3):797–802. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.28074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yawn RJ, Hunter JB, O’Connell BP, Wanna GB, Killeen DE, Wick CC, Isaacson B, Rivas A (2017) Audiometric outcomes following endoscopic ossicular chain reconstruction. Otol Neurotol 38(9):1296–1300. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000001527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chung J, Kang JY, Kim MS, Kim B, Choi JW (2020) Microscopic vs endoscopic ear surgery for congenital ossicular anomaly. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 162(4):548–553. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599819900489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tsetsos N, Vlachtsis K, Stavrakas M, Fyrmpas G (2021) Endoscopic versus microscopic ossiculoplasty in chronic otitis media: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 278(4):917–923. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06182-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. McCallum R, Mohd Slim MA, Iyer A (2022) Audit of post-operative pain scores after endoscopic and microscopic ear surgery. Clin Otolaryngol 47(2):369–374. https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.13904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fradeani D, Milner TD, Iyer A (2021) Learning curve in endoscopic tympanoplasties: a prospective study based on outcomes of 141 cases. Clin Otolaryngol 46(4):888–892. https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.13746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Curran JF, Coleman H, Tikka T, Iyer A (2022) Comparison of outcomes of endoscopic ear surgery with microsurgery for cholesteatoma: a prospective study of 91 cases with three-year follow-up. Clin Otolaryngol 47(1):197–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.13856

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors have contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by AI, TT, JC, and HC. The first draft of the manuscript was written by HC and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arunachalam Iyer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was waived by the local Ethics Committee of University hospital Monklands in view of the retrospective nature of the study and all the procedures being performed were part of the routine care.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Coleman, H., Tikka, T., Curran, J. et al. Comparison of endoscopic vs microscopic ossiculoplasty: a study of 157 consecutive cases. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 280, 89–96 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07451-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07451-2

Keywords

Navigation