Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Immediate or interval abscess tonsillectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Letter to the Editor to this article was published on 17 March 2022

Abstract

Objectives

Peritonsillar abscess is a common complication of acute tonsillitis. However, no consensus has been reached yet on the optimal treatment of this condition. Therefore, this study aimed to compare clinical outcomes of immediate and interval abscess tonsillectomy.

Methods

The databases of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched for completed studies published until the 1st of November 2021. Comparative studies assessing intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of immediate and interval abscess tonsillectomy were considered, with the primary outcome being postoperative hemorrhage. Operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain, and duration of hospital stay were classed as secondary outcomes. A random-effects pairwise meta-analysis of both randomized and non-randomized trials was conducted. Subgroup analysis linked to the randomization of trials was executed. Quality assessment was performed, utilizing the Cochrane risk of bias tool and ROBINS-I tool for randomized and non-randomized trials, respectively.

Results

Data from 265 cases stemming from six trials were pooled together. For postoperative bleeding rates, no statistically significant difference between immediate and interval tonsillectomy was detected (OR = 1.26; 95% CI 0.27, 5.86; p = 0.77). By contrast, longer hospital stay was observed for patients subjected to interval tonsillectomy (SMD = − 0.78; CI − 1.39 to− 0.17; p = 0.01). For operative time and intraoperative blood loss, no statistically significant difference was noticed between immediate and interval tonsillectomy (SMD = 1.10; 95% CI − 0.13, 2.33; p = 0.08; and SMD = 0.04; 95% CI − 0.49, 0.57; p = 0.88; respectively).

Conclusions

This study shows that quinsy tonsillectomy appears to be a safe method, providing full abscess drainage and instant relief of the symptoms. Moreover, quinsy tonsillectomy was not associated with a statistically higher postoperative hemorrhage incidence rate than immediate tonsillectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Khan MA, Ahmed A, Khan M (2020) Comparison of early versus interval tonsillectomy in cases of peritonsillar abscess. Life Sci 1(1):5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Simon LM, Matijasec JWD, Perry AP, Kakade A, Walvekar RR, Kluka EA (2013) Pediatric peritonsillar abscess: quinsy ie versus interval tonsillectomy. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 77(8):1355–1358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Klug TE, Rusan M, Fuursted K, Ovesen T (2016) Peritonsillar abscess: complication of acute tonsillitis or webers glands infection? Otolaryngol—Head Neck Surg (United States) 155(2):199–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lockhart R, Tami TA, Parker GS (1991) Role of quinsy tonsillectomy in the management of peritonsillar abscess. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 100(7):569–571

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fagan JJ, Wormald PJ (1994) Quinsy tonsillectomy or interval tonsillectomy—a prospective randomised trial. S Afr Med J 84(10):689–690. PMID: 7839259

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chang B, Thamboo A, Burton M, Diamond C, Nunez D (2016) Needle aspiration versus incision and drainage for the treatment of peritonsillar abscess. Cochrane Libr. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006287.pub4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339:b2700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Higgins JPT, Altman DG (2008) Chapter 8: assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (eds) Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (UK)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M et al (2016) ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 355:4–10

    Google Scholar 

  10. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration (2011) Review Manager (RevMan). 5.1. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark

  11. Deeks JJ, Higgins JP, Altman DG (2008) Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. Cochrane Handb Syst Rev Interv Cochrane B Ser. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470712184.ch9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG (2002) No title. Stat Med 21:1539e1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Higgins JPTTS (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Power Anal Behav Sci 21(11):1539

    Google Scholar 

  14. Reeves BC, Deeks JJ, Higgins JPTWG. (2008) Including non-randomized studies. Cochrane Handb Syst Rev Interv Chapter 13

  15. Reeves BC, Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT WG. (2011) Including non-randomized studies. Cochrane Handb Syst Rev Interv Version 510 (updated March 2011) Cochrane Collab Chapter 13

  16. Cohen J (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2 edn. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Arshad A, Mazhar I, Ghulam DK, Muhammad I, Muhammad I, Najam ulHK (2021) A comparative analysis of per and post-operative complications in patients undergoing early and delayed interval tonsillectomies. Pak Postgrad Med J 31(04):190–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chowdhury CR, Bricknell MC (1992) The management of quinsy--a prospective study. J Laryngol Otol 106(11):986–988. https://doi.org/10.1017/s002221510012153x. PMID: 1479277

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Javed M, Fazal-I-Wahid KN, Khan Q, Massemul H, Khan SI (2014) Interval tonsillectomies; comparison of per and post operative complications in patients undergoing early and delayed after peritosnisllar abscess. Prof Med J 21(5):1043–1047

    Google Scholar 

  20. Herzon F (1995) Peritonsillar abscess: incidence, current management practices and a proposal for treatment guidelines. Laryngoscope 105:1–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Klug TE, Greve T, Hentze M (2020) Complications of peritonsillar abscess. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob [Internet] 19(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-020-00375-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Windfuhr J, Chen Y (2001) Immediate abscess tonsillectomy: a safe procedure? Auris Nasus Larynx 28(323):7

    Google Scholar 

  23. Giger R, Landis BN, Dulguerov P (2005) Hemorrhage risk after quinsy tonsillectomy. Otolaryngol—Head Neck Surg 133(5):729–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Esposito S, Marchisio P, Capaccio P, Bellasio M, Semino M, Dusi E et al (2009) Risk factors for bacteremia during and after adenoidectomy and/or adenotonsillectomy. J Infect [Internet] 58(2):113–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2008.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Klug TE, Henriksen JJ, Rusan M, Fuursted K, Ovesen T (2012) Bacteremia during quinsy and elective tonsillectomy: an evaluation of antibiotic prophylaxis recommendations for patients undergoing tonsillectomy. J Cardiovasc Pharm Ther 17(3):298–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Soldado L, Esteban F, Delgado-Rodríguez M, Solanellas J, Florez C, Martín E (1998) Bacteraemia during tonsillectomy: a study of the factors involved and clinical implications. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 23(1):63–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Suzuki M, Ueyama T, Mogi G (1998) Immediate tonsillectomy for peritonsillar abscess. Auris Nasus Larynx 26:299–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Albertz N, Nazar G (2012) Peritonsillar abscess: treatment with immediate tonsillectomy—10 years of experience. Acta Otolaryngol 132(10):1102–1107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Baptista LAN (2018) Risk factors for peritonsillar abscess recurrence. Diss. Universidade de Coimbra

    Google Scholar 

  30. Windfuhr JP, Ulbrich T (2001) Post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage: results of a 3-month follow-up. Ear Nose Throat J 80(11):790:795–798. 800 passim. PMID: 11816891

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tugrul S, Degirmenci N, Eren SB, Dogan R, Veyseller B, Ozturan O (2015) Analgesic effect of magnesium in post-tonsillectomy patients: a prospective randomised clinical trial. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 272(9):2483–2487

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Leach J, Manning S, Schaefer S (1993) Comparison of two methods of tonsillectomy. Laryngoscope 103:619–622

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Mitchell RB, Archer SM, Ishman SL, Rosenfeld RM, Coles S, Finestone SA et al (2019) Clinical Practice Guideline: Tonsillectomy in Children (Update)—Executive Summary. Otolaryngol—Head Neck Surg (United States) 160(2):187–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Chung JH, Lee YC, Shin SY, Eun YG (2014) Risk factors for recurrence of peritonsillar abscess. J Laryngol Otol 57(2):1084–1088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang YP, Wang MC, Lin HC, Chou P (2014) The impact of prior tonsillitis and treatment modality on the recurrence of peritonsillar abscess: a nationwide cohort study. PLoS ONE 9(10):20–22

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Wikstén J, Hytönen M, Pitkäranta A, Blomgren K (2012) Who ends up having tonsillectomy after peritonsillar infection? Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 269(4):1281–1284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Schraff S, McGinn JD, Derkay CS (2001) Peritonsillar abscess in children: a 10-year review of diagnosis and management. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 57(3):213–218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AT was the primary author. AF assisted the primary author with data extraction, study selection, and literature research, whereas FD was involved in quality assessment. KG, ΙΤ, and PK reviewed the final version of the manuscript. ST and KT provided methodological advice and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript. Finally, CS and ST supervised the study and provided guidance on specific scientific issues. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexios Tsikopoulos.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 12 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsikopoulos, A., Fountarlis, A., Tsikopoulos, K. et al. Immediate or interval abscess tonsillectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 279, 2245–2257 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07294-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07294-x

Keywords

Navigation