Skip to main content
Log in

The comprehensive audiological evaluation in young violinists: the medial olivocochlear system, high frequency thresholds, and the auditory figure ground test

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to examine whether the medial olivocochlear hearing system functions, the high frequency hearing thresholds and speech discrimination in noise performance can guide us in assessing the risk of hearing loss among violinists. It is aimed to investigate possible hearing damage that is not reflected in pure tone hearing thresholds in violinists.

Methods

The participants (n = 50) who have normal hearing and the ages of 18–30 were included in this study in two groups: violinists and controls who are unrelated to music. High frequency audiometer, auditory figure ground test (AFG) for speech discrimination in noise performance, Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission (DPOAE) and contralateral suppression on DPOAE for medial olivocochlear system function tests were applied to all participants as well as routine audiological tests.

Results

The high frequency hearing thresholds were obtained higher in violinists compared to the controls. In violinists, the AFG test scores and the suppression amount at 1 kHz were lower than the controls. In addition, DPOAE responses at 4–6 kHz were obtained lower in violinists (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

The reason for high frequency hearing loss, decreased DPOAE response amplitudes, and poor medial olivocochlear function in violinists can be explained by the long-term exposure to high-level noise caused by the violin, one of the closest musical instruments. Routine and comprehensive audiological follow-up is crucial for musicians.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brown CJ, Jeon E-K, Driscoll V, Mussoi B, Deshpande SB, Gfeller K, Abbas P (2017) Effects of long-term musical training on cortical evoked auditory potentials. Ear Hear 38:e74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bulut E, Öztürk G, Taş M, Türkmen M, Gülmez Z, Öztürk L (2019) Medial olivocochlear suppression in musicians versus non-musicians. Physiol Int 106:151–157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Couth S, Prendergast G, Guest H, Munro KJ, Moore DR, Plack CJ, Ginsborg J, Dawes P (2020) Investigating the effects of noise exposure on self-report, behavioral and electrophysiological indices of hearing damage in musicians with normal audiometric thresholds. Hear Res 395:021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. de Oliveira Gonçalves CG, Lacerda ABM, Zeigelboim BS, Marques JM, Luders D (2013) Auditory thresholds among military musicians: Conventional and high frequency. CEP 82410:460

    Google Scholar 

  5. Di Stadio A, Dipietro L, Ricci G, Della Volpe A, Minni A, Greco A, De Vincentiis M, Ralli M (2018) Hearing loss, tinnitus, hyperacusis, and diplacusis in professional musicians: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15:2120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dünnwald H (1991) Deduction of objective quality parameters on old and new violins. Catgut Acoust Soc J 1:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  7. Escobar J, Mussoi BS, Silberer AB (2020) The effect of musical training and working memory in adverse listening situations. Ear Hear 41:278–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fleming D, Belleville S, Peretz I, West G, Zendel BR (2019) The effects of short-term musical training on the neural processing of speech-in-noise in older adults. Brain Cogn 136:592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Guinan JJ Jr (2006) Olivocochlear efferents: anatomy, physiology, function, and the measurement of efferent effects in humans. Ear Hear 27:589–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hall JW (2000) Handbook of otoacoustic emissions. Cengage Learning, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  11. Høydal EH, LeinStørmer CC, Laukli E, Stenklev NC (2017) Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in rock musicians. Int J Audiol 56:685–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jansen E, Helleman H, Dreschler W, de Laat J (2009) Noise induced hearing loss and other hearing complaints among musicians of symphony orchestras. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 82:153–164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jansson E, Bork I, Meyer J (1986) Investigations into the acoustical properties of the violin. Acta Acust Acust 62:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kähäri K, Zachau G, Eklöf M, Sandsjö L, Möller C (2003) Assessment of hearing and hearing disorders in rock/jazz musicians: evaluación de la audición y de los problemas auditivos en músicos de rock y jazz. Int J Audiol 42:279–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kähäri KR, Axelsson A, Hellström P-A, Zachau G (2001) Hearing development in classical orchestral musicians. A follow-up study. Scand Audiol 30:141–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kirk EC, Smith DW (2003) Protection from acoustic trauma is not a primary function of the medial olivocochlear efferent system. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 4:445–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kumar P, Grover V, Sanju HK, Sinha S (2016) Assessment of rock musician’s efferent system functioning using contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions. World J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 2:214–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lüders D, de Oliveira Gonçalves CG, de Moreira Lacerda AB, Ribas Â, de Conto J (2014) Music students: conventional hearing thresholds and at high frequencies. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 80:296–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Madsen SM, Marschall M, Dau T, Oxenham AJ (2019) Speech perception is similar for musicians and non-musicians across a wide range of conditions. Sci Rep 9:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Maison S, Micheyl C, Andéol G, Gallégo S, Collet L (2000) Activation of medial olivocochlear efferent system in humans: influence of stimulus bandwidth. Hear Res 140:111–125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Maison SF, Luebke AE, Liberman MC, Zuo J (2002) Efferent protection from acoustic injury is mediated via α9 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors on outer hair cells. J Neurosci 22:10838–10846

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Meha-Bettison K, Sharma M, Ibrahim RK, Mandikal Vasuki PR (2018) Enhanced speech perception in noise and cortical auditory evoked potentials in professional musicians. Int J Audiol 57:40–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Morais D, Benito JI, Almaraz A (2007) Acoustic trauma in classical music players. Acta Otorrinolaringol (Engl Ed) 58:401–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Morse-Fortier C, Parrish MM, Baran JA, Freyman RL (2017) The effects of musical training on speech detection in the presence of informational and energetic masking. Trends Hear 21:2331216517739427

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Otsuka S, Tsuzaki M, Sonoda J, Tanaka S, Furukawa S (2016) A role of medial olivocochlear reflex as a protection mechanism from noise-induced hearing loss revealed in short-practicing violinists. PLoS ONE 11:e0146751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pouryaghoub G, Mehrdad R, Pourhosein S (2017) Noise-induced hearing loss among professional musicians. J Occup Health 59:33–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rosanowski F, Eysholdt U (1996) In situ sound pressure measurement in a professional violinist with bilateral tinnitus. Laryngorhinootologie 75:514–516

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Royster JD, Royster LH, Killion MC (1991) Sound exposures and hearing thresholds of symphony orchestra musicians. J Acoust Soc Am 89:2793–2803

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sayler SK, Roberts BJ, Manning MA, Sun K, Neitzel RL (2019) Patterns and trends in osha occupational noise exposure measurements from 1979 to 2013. Occup Environ Med 76:118–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Schmidt JH, Paarup HM, Bælum J (2019) Tinnitus severity is related to the sound exposure of symphony orchestra musicians independently of hearing impairment. Ear Hear 40:88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Schmidt JH, Pedersen ER, Paarup HM, Christensen-Dalsgaard J, Andersen T, Poulsen T, Bælum J (2014) Hearing loss in relation to sound exposure of professional symphony orchestra musicians. Ear Hear 35:448–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Schmuziger N, Patscheke J, Probst R (2007) An assessment of threshold shifts in nonprofessional pop/rock musicians using conventional and extended high-frequency audiometry. Ear Hear 28:643–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Skoe E, Camera S, Tufts J (2019) Noise exposure may diminish the musician advantage for perceiving speech in noise. Ear Hear 40:782–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Slater J, Kraus N (2016) The role of rhythm in perceiving speech in noise: A comparison of percussionists, vocalists and non-musicians. Cogn Process 17:79–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Washnik NJ, Bhatt IS, Phillips SL, Tucker D, Richter S (2020) Evaluation of cochlear activity in normal-hearing musicians. Hear Res 395:108027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wenmaekers R, Nicolai B, Hornikx M, Kohlrausch A (2017) Why orchestral musicians are bound to wear earplugs: about the ineffectiveness of physical measures to reduce sound exposure. J Acoust Soc Am 142:3154–3164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Yoo J, Bidelman GM (2019) Linguistic, perceptual, and cognitive factors underlying musicians’ benefits in noise-degraded speech perception. Hear Res 377:189–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang F, Roland C, Rasul D, Cahn S, Liang C, Valencia G (2019) Comparing musicians and non-musicians in signal-in-noise perception. Int J Audiol 58:717–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There is no funding source.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nuriye Yıldırım Gökay.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Gazi University approved this study with the decision number 507.

Informed consent

The informed consent approvals of all participants were obtained from themselves.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gündüz, B., Yıldırım Gökay, N., Orhan, E. et al. The comprehensive audiological evaluation in young violinists: the medial olivocochlear system, high frequency thresholds, and the auditory figure ground test. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 279, 3837–3845 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-07122-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-07122-8

Keywords

Navigation