Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of vocal fatigue and vocal tract discomfort between teachers of normal pupils and teachers of mentally disabled pupils

  • Laryngology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to study the comparison of vocal fatigue and vocal tract discomfort between teachers of normal pupils and teachers of mentally disabled pupils.

Study Design

Cross-sectional study

Methods

Participants were 179 teachers (50 male, 129 female) and 30 non-teachers (14 male, 16 female) who participated in the current study. The teachers work in elementary schools. Furthermore, 87 of the teachers work for mentally disabled pupils at special elementary schools. Non-teachers were Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences employees who consider as the control group. They completed the Persian VFI and VTDp questionnaires three times, at the beginning, middle, and end of their office hours for 1 workday.

Results

The current study’s findings indicate that the Persian VFI and VTD scores of non-teachers were significantly lower than teachers' scores. Furthermore, teachers of mentally disabled pupils demonstrated higher values from teachers of normal pupils based on the Persian VFI and VTDp scores

Conclusion

The study results showed that teachers experienced more vocal fatigue and vocal tract discomfort than non-teachers. Furthermore, teachers of mentally disabled pupils indicated more vocal fatigue, the larynx’s physical discomfort, and vocal tract discomfort, but this difference was practically small.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Solomon NP (2007) Vocal fatigue and its relation to vocal hyperfunction. Int J Speech Lang Pathol 10:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/14417040701730990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Welham NV, Maclagan MA (2003) Vocal fatigue: current knowledge and future directions. J Voice 17:21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0892-1997(03)00033-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boucher VJ, Ayad T (2010) Physiological attributes of vocal fatigue and their acoustic effects: a synthesis of findings for a criterion-based prevention of acquired voice disorders. J Voice 24:324–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.10.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gotaas C, Starr C (1993) Vocal fatigue among teachers. Folia Phoniatr 45:120–129. https://doi.org/10.1159/000266237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Simberg S, Sala E, Vehmas K, Laine A (2005) Changes in the prevalence of vocal symptoms among teachers during a twelve-year period. J Voice 19:95–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2004.02.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith E, Lemke J, Taylor M, Kirchner H, Hoffman H (1998) Frequency of voice problems among teachers and other occupations. J Voice 12:480–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(98)80057-X

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Russel A, Oates J, Greenwood K (1998) Prevalence of voice problems in teachers. J Voice 12:467–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(98)80056-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Urrutikoetxea A, Ispizua A, Matellanes F (1995) Pathologie vocale chez les professeurs: une e´tude vide´o-laryngo-stroboscopique de 1046 professeurs. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol 116:255–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0892-1997(03)00033-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Colton RH, Casper JK, Leonard R (2006) understanding voice problems: a physiological perspective for diagnosis and treatment, 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stemple JC, Roy N, Klaben BK (2014) Clinical voice pathology. fifth edition. plural Publication

  11. Dabirmoghaddam P, Hassan Khoramshahi H, Dehqan A, Scherer RC, Ansari NN (2020) Construct and discriminant validity of the Persian version of the consensus auditory perceptual evaluation of voice (CAPE-V). J Voice Article Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.09.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nanjundeswaran C, Jacobson BH, Gartner-Schmidt J, Abbott KV (2015) Vocal fatigue index (VFI): development and validation. J Voice 29(4):433–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.09.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Naderifar E, Moradi N, Farzadi F, Tahmasebi N, Soltani M, Latifi SM, Nanjundeswaran C (2019) Crosscultural adaptation and validation of the vocal fatigue index into Persian. J Voice 33(6):947–1035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.07.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lopes WL, Cabral FG, Figueiredo de Almeida AA (2015) Vocal tract discomfort symptoms in patients with different voice disorders. J Voice 29(3):317–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mathieson L, Hirani SP, Epstein R, Baken RJ, Wood G, Rubin JS (2009) Laryngeal manual therapy: a preliminary study to examine its treatment effects in the management of muscle tension dysphonia. J Voice 23(3):353–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2007.10.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rodrigues G, Zambon F, Mathieson L, Behlau M (2013) Vocal tract discomfort in teachers: its relationship to self-reported voice disorders. J Voice 27(4):473–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.01.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Torabi H, Khoddami SM, Ansari NN, Dabirmoghaddam P (2016) The vocal tract discomfort scale: validity and reliability of the Persian version in the assessment of patients with muscle tension dysphonia. J Voice 30(6):711–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.08.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Smith E, Gray SD, Dove H, Kirchner L, Heras H (1997) Frequency and effects of teachers’ voice problems. J Voice 11:81–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(97)80027-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Roy N, Merrill RM, Thibeault S, Gray SD, Smith EM (2004) Voice disorders in teachers and the general population. effects on work performance, attendance, and future career choices. J Speech Lang Hear Res 47:542–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Villanueva-Reyes A (2011) Voice disorders in the metropolitan area of San Juan, Puerto Rico: profiles of occupational groups. J Voice 25:83–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.03.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Buekers R, Bierens E, Kingma H, Marres EH (1995) Vocal load as measured by the voice accumulator. Folia Phoniatr 47:252–261. https://doi.org/10.1159/000266359

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Morrow SL, Connor NP (2011) Comparison of voice-use profiles between elementary classroom and music teachers. J Voice 25:367–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.11.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Morrow SL, Connor NP (2011) Voice amplification as a means of reducing vocal load for elementary music teachers. J Voice 25:441–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2010.04.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Titze IR (1999) Toward occupational safety criteria for vocalization. Log Phon Vocol 24:49–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/140154399435110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Titze, I. R (2000) Principles of Voice Production. Second printing (National Center for Voice and Speech, Iowa City, IA) pp. 229–233, 361–366. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4950812

  26. Titze IR, Hunter EJ (2015) “Comparison of vocal vibration-dose measures for potential-damage risk criteria.” J Speech Lang Hear Res 58(5):1425–1439. https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_JSLHR-S-13-0128

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Titze IR, Svec JG, Popolo PS (2003) “Vocal dose measures: quantifying accumulated vibration exposure in vocal fold tissues.” J Speech Lang Hear Res 46(6):919–932. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2003/072)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Hunter EJ, Titze IR (2009) Quantifying vocal fatigue recovery: dynamic vocal recovery trajectories after a vocal loading exercise. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 118(6):449–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940911800608

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Hunter EJ, Titze IR (2010) Variations in intensity, fundamental frequency, and voicing for teachers in occupational versus nonoccupational settings. J Sp Lang Hear Res 53:862–875. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2009/09-0040)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bottalico P, Astolfi A (2012) Investigations into vocal doses and parameters pertaining to primary school teachers in classrooms. J Acoust Soc Am 131(4):2817–2827. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3689549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bottalico P, Graetzer S, Hunter EJ (2015) Effects of voice style, noise level and acoustic feedback on objective and subjective voice evaluations. J Acoust Soc Am 138(6):498–503. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4936643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zannin PH, Zwirtes DP (2009) Evaluation of the acoustic performance of classrooms in public schools. Appl Acoust 70:626–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2008.06.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Augustyńska D, Kaczmarska A, Mikulski W, Radosz J (2010) Assessment of teachers’ exposure to noise in primary schools. Arch Acoust 35:521–542

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zannin PH, Marcon CR (2007) Objective and subjective evaluation of the acoustic comfort in classrooms. Appl Ergon 38:675–680. https://doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.149569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gonçalves VD, Silva LB, Coutinho AS (2009) English title is: noise compromising the speech intelligibility for teachers. Production 19:466–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Astolfi A, Pellerey F (2008) Subjective and objective assessment of acoustical and overall environmental quality in secondary school classrooms. J Acoust Soc Am 123:163–173. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2816563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Simões-Zenari M, Bitar ML, Nemr NK (2012) The effect of noise on the voice of preschool institution educators. Rev Saude Publica 46:657–664. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102012005000038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hétu R, Truchon-Gagnon C, Bilodeau SA (1990) Problems of noise in school settings: a review of literature and the results of an exploratory study. J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol 14:31–39

    Google Scholar 

  39. Van Lierde KM, Claeys S, Dhaeseleer E, Deley S, Derde K, Herregods I, Strybol I, Wuyts F (2010) The Vocal quality in female student teachers during the 3 years of study. J Voice 24(5):599–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.01.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Azevedo LL, Vianello L, Oliveira HGP, Oliveira IA, Oliveira BFV, Silva CM (2009) Vocal complaints and degree of dysphonia in elementary schoolteachers. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol 14:192–196. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-80342009000200009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Behlau M, Zambon F, Guerrieri AC, Roy N (2012) Epidemiology of voice disorders in teachers and nonteachersin Brazil: Prevalence and adverse effects. J Voice 26:665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.09.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sim~oes M, Latorre MRDO (2006) Preval^encia de alterac¸~ao vocal em educadoras. [Prevalence of vocal alterations in teachers]. Rev Sa_ude P_ublica 40: 1013–1018.

  43. Roy N, Merrill RM, Thibeault S, Gray SD, Smith EM (2004) Voice disorders in teachers and the general population: effects on work performance, attendance, and future career choices. J Speech Lang Hear Res 47:542–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hassan Khoramshahi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendices

Appendix 1 Tiredness of voice and teachers of different schools

figure a

Appendix 2 Physical Discomfort and teachers of different schools

figure b

Appendix 3 Improvement with Rest and teachers of different schools

figure c

Appendix 4 Frequency subscale of VTD and teachers of different schools

figure d

Appendix 5 Severity subscale of VTD and teachers of different schools

figure e

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khoramshahi, H., Dehqan, A., Scherer, R.C. et al. Comparison of vocal fatigue and vocal tract discomfort between teachers of normal pupils and teachers of mentally disabled pupils. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 278, 2429–2436 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06863-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06863-w

Keywords

Navigation