Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Characterization of pain after tympanoplasty and tympanomastoidectomy and analysis of risk factors. A prospective cohort study

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To characterize postoperative pain after tympanoplasty and tympanomastoidectomy and correlate between pain severity and various technical aspects of the surgery.

Methods

We carried out a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing ear surgery in a tertiary referral center between 7/2018 and 7/2019. Patients filled in a pain questionnaire and scored pain intensity on a visual analog scale preoperatively and on postoperative days (POD) 1–4, 21, and 49. The responses were correlated with clinical and operative data, including surgical technique-related details.

Results

Sixty-two patients participated in the study (27 males and 35 females, average age 41.1 ± 20.02 years [range 18–68]). The median preoperative VAS was 5, followed by 6 on POD1, 5 on POD3, and 1 at 3 and 9 weeks. The preoperative questionnaire score normalized to 10 was 4.5 (32/70), 5.1 on POD1, 4.7 on POD3, 0.85 at 3 weeks and 0.85 at 9 weeks. The predictive factors for increased postoperative pain were younger age, the presence of a comorbidity, revision surgery, preoperative dizziness or tinnitus and postoperative tinnitus. The predictive factors for decreased pain were smoking and the addition of a mastoidectomy. None of the factors related to the surgical technique (e.g., surgical approaches, type of reconstruction, specific surgeon) significantly affected the questionnaire responses or the pain VAS intensity scores.

Conclusions

We demonstrated that younger age, the presence of a comorbidity, revision surgery, preoperative dizziness or tinnitus and postoperative tinnitus were predictors of increased pain after tympanoplasty and tympanomastoidectomy, while the inclusion of a mastoidectomy was a predictor of decreased pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sommer M, Geurts JWJM, Stessel B et al (2009) Prevalence and predictors of postoperative pain after ear, nose, and throat surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 135:124–130. https://doi.org/10.1001/archoto.2009.3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Güven M, Kara A, Yilmaz MS et al (2018) Comparison of incidence and severity of chronic postsurgical pain following ear surgery. J CraniofacSurg 29:e552–e555. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000004532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nemati S, Okhovvat SA, Naghavi SE et al (2014) Relative frequency of chronic postoperative pain in patients operated for chronic otitis media. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 271:2139–2143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2696-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Manna S, Kaul VF, Gray ML, Wanna GB (2019) Endoscopic versus microscopic middle ear surgery: a meta-analysis of outcomes following tympanoplasty and stapes surgery. OtolNeurotol 40:983–993. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000002353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wittekindt D, Wittekindt C, Meissner W, Guntinas-Lichius O (2012) Postoperative pain assessment after middle ear surgery. HNO 60:974–984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-012-2556-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jung KH, Cho Y-S, Hong SH et al (2010) Quality-of-life assessment after primary and revision ear surgery using the chronic ear survey. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 136:358–365. https://doi.org/10.1001/archoto.2010.24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nadol JB, Staecker H, Gliklich RE (2000) Outcomes assessment for chronic otitis media: the Chronic Ear Survey. Laryngoscope 110:32–35. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200003002-00009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Martin T, Moualed D, Paul A et al (2015) The Cambridge Otology Quality of Life Questionnaire : an otology- specific patient-recorded outcome measure. A paper describing the instrument design and a report of preliminary reliability and validity. ClinOtolaryngol 40:130–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.12338

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Plodpai Y (2018) Endoscopic vs microscopic overlay tympanoplasty for correcting large tympanic membrane perforations: a randomized clinical trial. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 159:879–886. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599818786948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rai AK, Singh GB, Sahu R et al (2014) Evaluation of simultaneous bilateral same day tympanoplasty type I in chronic suppurative otitis media. Auris Nasus Larynx 41:148–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2013.10.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oren Cavel.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

Study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards, approved by the institutional ethics committee and informed consent was achieved from all subjects.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 33 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carmel Neiderman, N.N., Frisch, M., Handzel, O. et al. Characterization of pain after tympanoplasty and tympanomastoidectomy and analysis of risk factors. A prospective cohort study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 279, 1765–1775 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06845-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06845-y

Keywords

Navigation