Skip to main content
Log in

Revision of cartilage tympanoplasty with endoscopic butterfly inlay myringoplasty

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

While the use of cartilage graft for revision tympanoplasty is quite common, the data on the revision of cartilage tympanoplasty are limited. Our study aims to present the results of our patients who underwent endoscopic butterfly inlay myringoplasty for the revision of cartilage tympanoplasty.

Methods

Demographic data, ear sides, perforation locations, graft success rates and hearing results of the patients who underwent endoscopic butterfly inlay myringoplasty for revision of cartilage tympanoplasty between Sep 2017 and Jan 2020 were evaluated.

Results

A total of 17 patients with 7 (41%) females and 10 (59%) males were included in our study. Eight of the ears (47%) were right and nine (53%) were left. Perforation locations included ten (59%) anterior, six (35%) inferior, and one (6%) posterior. The graft success rate of our study was 100%. No changes were observed in post-operative air conduction, bone conduction and air–bone gap values compared to the pre-operative period (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Endoscopic butterfly inlay myringoplasty for the revision of cartilage tympanoplasty is considered to be a safe surgical technique with satisfactory anatomical and hearing results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Demirci S, Tuzuner A, Karadas H, Acıkgoz C, Caylan R, Samim EE (2014) Comparison of temporal muscle fascia and cartilage grafts in pediatric tympanoplasties. Am J Otolaryngol 35(6):796–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Marchioni D, Gazzini L, De Rossi S, Di Maro F, Sacchetto L, Carner M, Bianconi L (2020) The management of tympanic membrane perforation with endoscopic type I tympanoplasty. Otol Neurotol 41(2):214–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sismanis A, Dodson K, Kyrodimos E (2008) Cartilage, “shield” grafts in revision tympanoplasty. Otol Neurotol 29(3):330–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yilmaz MS, Guven M, Kayabasoglu G, Varli AF (2015) Comparison of the anatomic and hearing outcomes of cartilage type 1 tympanoplasty in pediatric and adult patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272(3):557–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ahan MuratSerhanMehmet SDD (2014) Factors affecting success and results of cartilage-perichondrium island graft in revision tympanoplasty. Int Adv Otol 10(1):64–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. YurttasYakutKutluhan VFA (2014) Preparation and placement of cartilage island graft in tympanoplasty. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 80(6):522–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Awad OG, Hamid KA (2015) Endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty in pediatric patients using tragal cartilage. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 141(6):532–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Booth JB (1974) Myringoplasty: the lessons of failure. J Laryngol Otol 88:1223–1235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Moore GF (2002) Revision tympanoplasty utilizing fossa triangularis cartilage. Laryngoscope 112:1543–1554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Altuna X, Navarro JJ, Algaba J (2012) Island cartilage tympanoplasty in revision cases: anatomic and functional results. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269(10):2169–2172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Menéndez Colino LM, Bernal Sprekelsen M (2002) Reconstruccióntímpanoosicular. Resultadosfuncionales de timpanoplastia con cartílago en empalizada y prótesis de titanio. Estudiopiloto Acta OtorrinolaringolEsp 53:718–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Boone RT, Gardner EK, DornhoVer JL (2004) Success of cartilage grafting in revision tympanoplasty without mastoidectomy. Otol Neurotol 25:678–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Westerberg J, Harder H, Magnuson B, Westerberg L, Hydén D (2011) Ten-year myringoplasty series: does the cause of perforation affect the success rate? J Laryngol Otol 125(2):126–132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lou Z (2020) Use of endoscopic cartilage graft myringoplasty without tympanomeatal flap elevation to repair posterior marginal perforations. Ear Nose Throat J 8:145561320931220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145561320931220

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emine Demir.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None (all the authors confirm that).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Demir, E., Terzi, S., Celiker, M. et al. Revision of cartilage tympanoplasty with endoscopic butterfly inlay myringoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 279, 187–190 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06669-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06669-w

Keywords

Navigation