Abstract
Purpose
While the use of cartilage graft for revision tympanoplasty is quite common, the data on the revision of cartilage tympanoplasty are limited. Our study aims to present the results of our patients who underwent endoscopic butterfly inlay myringoplasty for the revision of cartilage tympanoplasty.
Methods
Demographic data, ear sides, perforation locations, graft success rates and hearing results of the patients who underwent endoscopic butterfly inlay myringoplasty for revision of cartilage tympanoplasty between Sep 2017 and Jan 2020 were evaluated.
Results
A total of 17 patients with 7 (41%) females and 10 (59%) males were included in our study. Eight of the ears (47%) were right and nine (53%) were left. Perforation locations included ten (59%) anterior, six (35%) inferior, and one (6%) posterior. The graft success rate of our study was 100%. No changes were observed in post-operative air conduction, bone conduction and air–bone gap values compared to the pre-operative period (p > 0.05).
Conclusions
Endoscopic butterfly inlay myringoplasty for the revision of cartilage tympanoplasty is considered to be a safe surgical technique with satisfactory anatomical and hearing results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Demirci S, Tuzuner A, Karadas H, Acıkgoz C, Caylan R, Samim EE (2014) Comparison of temporal muscle fascia and cartilage grafts in pediatric tympanoplasties. Am J Otolaryngol 35(6):796–9
Marchioni D, Gazzini L, De Rossi S, Di Maro F, Sacchetto L, Carner M, Bianconi L (2020) The management of tympanic membrane perforation with endoscopic type I tympanoplasty. Otol Neurotol 41(2):214–221
Sismanis A, Dodson K, Kyrodimos E (2008) Cartilage, “shield” grafts in revision tympanoplasty. Otol Neurotol 29(3):330–333
Yilmaz MS, Guven M, Kayabasoglu G, Varli AF (2015) Comparison of the anatomic and hearing outcomes of cartilage type 1 tympanoplasty in pediatric and adult patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272(3):557–562
Ahan MuratSerhanMehmet SDD (2014) Factors affecting success and results of cartilage-perichondrium island graft in revision tympanoplasty. Int Adv Otol 10(1):64–67
YurttasYakutKutluhan VFA (2014) Preparation and placement of cartilage island graft in tympanoplasty. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 80(6):522–526
Awad OG, Hamid KA (2015) Endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty in pediatric patients using tragal cartilage. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 141(6):532–538
Booth JB (1974) Myringoplasty: the lessons of failure. J Laryngol Otol 88:1223–1235
Moore GF (2002) Revision tympanoplasty utilizing fossa triangularis cartilage. Laryngoscope 112:1543–1554
Altuna X, Navarro JJ, Algaba J (2012) Island cartilage tympanoplasty in revision cases: anatomic and functional results. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269(10):2169–2172
Menéndez Colino LM, Bernal Sprekelsen M (2002) Reconstruccióntímpanoosicular. Resultadosfuncionales de timpanoplastia con cartílago en empalizada y prótesis de titanio. Estudiopiloto Acta OtorrinolaringolEsp 53:718–724
Boone RT, Gardner EK, DornhoVer JL (2004) Success of cartilage grafting in revision tympanoplasty without mastoidectomy. Otol Neurotol 25:678–681
Westerberg J, Harder H, Magnuson B, Westerberg L, Hydén D (2011) Ten-year myringoplasty series: does the cause of perforation affect the success rate? J Laryngol Otol 125(2):126–132
Lou Z (2020) Use of endoscopic cartilage graft myringoplasty without tympanomeatal flap elevation to repair posterior marginal perforations. Ear Nose Throat J 8:145561320931220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145561320931220
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None (all the authors confirm that).
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Demir, E., Terzi, S., Celiker, M. et al. Revision of cartilage tympanoplasty with endoscopic butterfly inlay myringoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 279, 187–190 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06669-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06669-w