Skip to main content
Log in

Suppression head impulse testing is recommended for vestibular testing of patients with untreated unilateral vestibular schwannoma

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Suppression head impulse testing (SHIMP) is a new vestibular method capable of quantifying vestibular function. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of this test in patients with existing or newly diagnosed vestibular schwannoma (VS) patients by comparing the results with the traditionally used video head impulse test (vHIT or HIMP).

Methods

Fifty-five patients with unilateral VS underwent a wide battery of audiological and vestibular tests. HIMP results were evaluated using newly introduced objective guidelines based on the trace evaluation of pathological saccades. The sensitivity and specificity of HIMP and SHIMP were evaluated and compared. A new SHIMP parameter is presented; the anticompensatory saccade amplitude ratio (ASAR).

Results

We found a marked increase in specificity in HIMP testing using the objective guidelines. SHIMP testing revealed a gain threshold of 0.7 to be optimal in terms of achieving high specificity and sensitivity in relation to HIMP testing. Significant correlations were found between a low ASAR and a high degree of vestibular pathology.

Conclusion

The SHIMP test is a viable addition to the standard HIMP test in patients with VS, especially with the addition of the ASAR, which could prove useful in monitoring the residual vestibular function.

Trial registration number and date of registration

N/A.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data are stored and registered in the electronic data capture systems provided by the manufacturers and stored in the Regional Electronic Data Record Systems provided by the University Hospital.

Code availability

All codes used are commercially available.

References

  1. Goldbrunner R, Weller M, Regis J, Lund-Johansen M, Stavrinou P, Reuss D, et al. EANO Guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of vestibular schwannoma. Available from: https://academic-oup-com.zorac.aub.aau.dk/neuro-oncology/advance-article/doi/https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noz153/5555902

  2. Taylor R, Kong J, Flanagan S, Pogson J, Croxson G, Pohl D, et al. Prevalence of vestibular dysfunction in patients with vestibular schwannoma using video head-impulses and vestibular-evoked potentials. 2015 262(5):1228–37. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25794859

  3. Lees KA, Tombers NM, Link MJ, Driscoll CL, Neff BA, Van Gompel JJ et al (2018) Natural history of sporadic vestibular schwannoma: a volumetric study of tumor growth 159(3):535–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599818770413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sass HCR, West N, Møller MN, Cayé-Thomasen P. (2018) [Workup and treatment of vestibular schwannomas]. 10 180(37).

  5. Riska KM, Murnane OD (2018) Chapter 8—the video head impulse test. Elsevier Inc. 13 p. (Dizziness and Vertigo Across the Lifespan)

  6. Van de Berg R, Rosengren S, Kingma H (2018) Laboratory testing of the vestibular system. 31(1):425–30. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20717033

  7. Halmagyi GM, Chen L, MacDougall HG, Weber KP, McGarvie LA, Curthoys IS (2017) The video head impulse test. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00258/full

  8. MacDougall H, McGarvie L, Halmagyi G, Rogers S, Manzari L, Burgess A, et al. (2016) A new saccadic indicator of peripheral vestibular function based on the video head impulse test. 87(4):410–8. Available from: https://search.proquest.com/docview/1807534031

  9. Rey-Martinez J, Yanes J, Esteban J, Sanz R, Martin-Sanz E. (2017) The role of predictability in saccadic eye responses in the suppression head impulse test of horizontal semicircular canal function. 8:536. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29093698

  10. Rey‐Martinez J, Thomas‐Arrizabalaga I, Espinosa‐Sanchez JM, Batuecas‐Caletrio A, Trinidad‐Ruiz G, Matiño‐Soler E, et al. (2018) Vestibulo‐ocular reflex gain values in the suppression head impulse test of healthy subjects. 128(10): 2383–9. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.27107

  11. Jacobson GP, Newman CW. The development of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory [Internet]. US: American Medical Association; 1990. p. 424–424–7. (Archives of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery; vol. 116). Available from: https://sfx.aub.aau.dk/sfxaub?sid=Entrez:PubMed&id=pmid:2317323

  12. Hallgren G, Bockhoff LB. The Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) Translation into Danish and test of the Danish version on ten patients with dizziness. University College Sealand 2008.

  13. Y Amy, W Irene, V Salomi, C Stephanie, MS K-J Tammie, (2013) Measurement characteristics and clinical utility of the dizziness handicap inventory among individuals with vestibular disorders. 94(11): 2313–4. Available from: https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0003999313005388

  14. Hougaard DD, Abrahamsen ER (2019) Functional testing of all six semicircular canals with video head impulse test systems. (146). Available from: https://www.jove.com/59012

  15. Abrahamsen E, Christensen A-E, Hougaard D (2018) Intra and interexaminer variability of two separate video head impulse test systems assessing all six semicircular canals. 39(2):e113–22. Available from: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=fulltext&D=ovft&AN=00129492-201802000-00022

  16. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. 42(2):377–81. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046408001226

  17. Aalling M, Skals RK, Abrahamsen ER, Hougaard DD (2020). Comparison of test results from two separate video head impulse test systems in a cohort of patients diagnosed with a unilateral vestibular schwannoma. Available from: https://search.proquest.com/docview/2415834205

  18. Hentschel M, Scholte M, Steens S, Kunst H, Rovers M (2017) The diagnostic accuracy of non-imaging screening protocols for vestibular schwannoma in patients with asymmetrical hearing loss and/or unilateral audiovestibular dysfunction: a diagnostic review and meta-analysis. 42(4):815–23. Available from: https://search.datacite.org/works/https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.12788

  19. Wagner J, Glaser M, Wowra B, Muacevic A, Goldbrunner R, Cnyrim C, et al. (2011) Vestibular function and quality of life in vestibular schwannoma: does size matter?. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2011.00055/full

  20. Kjærsgaard J, Szeremet M, Hougaard D (2019) Vestibular Deficits Correlating to Dizziness Handicap Inventory Score, hearing loss, and tumor size in a Danish cohort of vestibular schwannoma patients. 40(6):813–9. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31135674

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data; or the creation of new software used in the work. Drafted the work or revised it critically for important intellectual content. Approved the version to be published and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Morten Klitskov Jensen.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

N/A. Complete video Head Impulse Testing with both HIMP and SHIMP test protocols and fulfillment of the Dizziness Handicap Questionnaire is part of the standard clinical evaluation of patients diagnosed with a vestibular schwannoma and the equipment used in this study is already approved for clinical testing. Furthermore, no patients had to undergo randomization to additional treatments or examinations. Therefore, a formal application to the North Denmark Region Committee on Research Ethics was not deemed necessary.

Consent to participate

All subjects were thoroughly informed about both types of vHIT testing prior to testing.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jensen, M.K., Hougaard, D.D. Suppression head impulse testing is recommended for vestibular testing of patients with untreated unilateral vestibular schwannoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 279, 91–99 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06621-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06621-y

Keywords

Navigation