Skip to main content
Log in

Temporal bone carcinoma: testing the prognostic value of a novel clinical and histological scoring system

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Our group recently proposed the novel Padova prognostic scoring system for temporal bone carcinoma (TBSCC) that considers: the revised Pittsburgh staging system; radiological dura mater involvement; non-anterior spread (medial, inferior or posterior into the temporal bone and skull base) of T4 tumors; and histological grade. The aim of the present study was to validate this prognostic TBSCC scoring system in a case series selected from the literature.

Methods

A search was run to identify studies on TBSCC reporting the variables included in our score for each patient. Then our system was applied to the data extracted.

Results

Only two published investigations reported all the clinical and pathological data required for our scoring system. In one series from the Gruppo Otologico in Piacenza (Italy), a significantly higher recurrence rate (p = 0.008), shorter disease-free survival (DFS) (p = 0.001), higher disease-specific mortality (DSM) (p = 0.006), and shorter disease-specific survival (DSS) (p = 0.004) were associated with scores ≥ 5. Receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis showed an AUC of 0.804 for TBSCC recurrence, and 0.832 for DSM. In a series from Kyushu University Hospital (Japan), a significantly higher DSM (p = 0.018) and shorter DSS (p = 0.021) were associated with scores ≥ 5. ROC analysis showed an AUC of 0.812 for tumor relapse and 0.790 for DSM.

Conclusion

Our TBSCC Padova scoring system confirmed its validity when applied to the only two international TBSCC series providing the required data. These preliminary results need to be confirmed in a multi-center prospective setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Employed data were retrieved from published articles available (see text for detail).

References

  1. Gillespie MB, Francis HW, Chee N et al (2001) Squamous cell carcinoma of the temporal bone: a radiographic-pathologic correlation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 127:803–807

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zanoletti E, Lovato A, Stritoni P et al (2015) A critical look at persistent problems in the diagnosis, staging and treatment of temporal bone carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rev 41:821–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Moody SA, Hirsch BE, Myers EN (2000) Squamous cell carcinoma of the external auditory canal: an evaluation of a staging system. Am J Otol 21:582–588

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lionello M, Stritoni P, Facciolo MC et al (2014) Temporal bone carcinoma. Current diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic concepts. J Surg Oncol 110:383–392

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Acharya PP, Sarma D, McKinnon B (2020) Trends of temporal bone cancer: SEER database. Am J Otolaryngol 41:102297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gupta R, Sandison A, Wenig BM et al (2019) Data set for the reporting of ear and temporal bone tumors: explanations and recommendations of the guidelines from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting. Arch Pathol Lab Med 143:593–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zanoletti E, Franz L, Cazzador D et al (2020) Temporal bone carcinoma: a novel prognostic score based on clinical and histological features. Head Neck 42:3693–3701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Grunkemeier GL, Jin R (2001) Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of clinical risk models. Ann Thorac Surg 72:323–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Marioni G, Zanoletti E, Giacomelli L et al (2016) Clinical and pathological parameters prognostic for increased risk of recurrence after postoperative radiotherapy for temporal bone carcinoma. Head Neck 38:894–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Bacciu A, Clemente IA, Piccirillo E et al (2013) Guidelines for treating temporal bone carcinoma based on long-term outcomes. Otol Neurotol 34:898–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nakagawa T, Kumamoto Y, Natori Y et al (2006) Squamous cell carcinoma of the external auditory canal and middle ear: an operation combined with preoperative chemoradiotherapy and free surgical margin. Otol Neurotol 27:242–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pugh RN, Murray-Lyon IM, Dawson JL et al (1973) Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices. Br J Surg 60:646–649

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wilson PW, D’Agostino RB, Levy D et al (1998) Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation 97:1837–1847

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Thamer M, Kaufman JS, Zhang Y et al (2015) Predicting early death among elderly dialysis patients: development and validation of a risk score to assist shared decision making for dialysis initiation. Am J Kidney Dis 66:1024–1032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang K, Liu W, Yan XL et al (2017) Long-term postoperative survival prediction in patients with colorectal liver metastasis. Oncotarget 8:79927–79934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Steyerberg EW, Vickers AJ, Cook NR et al (2010) Assessing the performance of prediction models: a framework for some traditional and novel measures. Epidemiology 21:128–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Luo X-L, He W, Huang H et al (2015) Design of a prognostic score model for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Head Neck 37:624–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chung MS, Choi YJ, Kim SO et al (2019) A scoring system for prediction of cervical lymph node metastasis in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Neurorad 40:1049–1054

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Franz L, Zanoletti E, Mazzoni A, Marioni G (2020) Histological type homogeneity: a cornerstone in analyzing temporal bone malignancies data. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 277(11):3233–3234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Marioni G, Martini A, Favaretto N et al (2016) Temporal bone carcinoma: a first glance beyond the conventional clinical and pathological prognostic factors. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273(10):2903–2910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Piras G, Grinblat G, Albertini R et al (2020) Management of squamous cell carcinoma of the temporal bone: long-term results and factors influencing outcomes. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06378-w

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shiga K, Nibu K, Fujimoto Y et al (2020) Multi-institutional survey of squamous cell carcinoma of the external auditory canal in Japan. Laryngoscope. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.28936

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Justice AC, Covinsky KE, Berlin JA (1999) Assessing the generalizability of prognostic information. Ann Intern Med 130:515–524

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Foote C, Woodward M, Jardine MJ (2017) Scoring risk scores: considerations before incorporating clinical risk prediction tools into your practice. Am J Kidney Dis 69:555–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zanoletti E, Marioni G, Stritoni P et al (2014) Temporal bone squamous cell carcinoma: analyzing prognosis with univariate and multivariate models. Laryngoscope 124:1192–1198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Clark LJ, Narula AA, Morgan DA et al (1991) Squamous carcinoma of the temporal bone: a revised staging. J Laryngol Otol 105:346–348

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Nabuurs CH, Kievit W, Labbé N et al (2020) Evaluation of the modified Pittsburgh classification for predicting the disease-free survival outcome of squamous cell carcinoma of the external auditory canal. Head Neck 42:3609–3622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Prasad SC, D’Orazio F, Medina M et al (2014) State of the art in temporal bone malignancies. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 22:154–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Moffat DA, Wagstaff SA, Hardy DG (2005) The outcome of radical surgery and postoperative radiotherapy for squamous carcinoma of the temporal bone. Laryngoscope 115:341–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Frances Coburn for correcting the English version of this paper.

Funding

This study was partly supported by Grant no. DOR1951845/19 (G. Marioni) from the University of Padova, Italy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: LF, EZ, AM, and GM. Methodology: LF, GM. Formal analysis: LF. Investigation: LF, EZ, SF, DC, NF, LC, AM, PN and GM. Resources: GM. Data curation: LF, EZ, SF, NF, DC, LC, GM. Writing—original draft preparation: LF, EZ, SF, DC, NF, LC, AM, PN and GM. Writing—review and editing: LF, EZ, SF, DC, NF, LC, AM, PN, and GM. Visualization: LF, EZ, SF, DC, NF, LC, AM, PN and GM. Supervision: AM, GM and PN. Project administration: EZ, LF, AM, PN and GM. Funding acquisition: GM.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gino Marioni.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest or competing interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 822 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Franz, L., Zanoletti, E., Franchella, S. et al. Temporal bone carcinoma: testing the prognostic value of a novel clinical and histological scoring system. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 278, 4179–4186 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06489-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06489-4

Keywords

Navigation