Skip to main content
Log in

Results of pretreatment swallowing evaluation in patients with stage III/IV laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma are among the common head and neck cancers causing considerable swallowing dysfunction. The functional status of the organ (larynx) is an important point of contention while considering the patients for organ preservation protocol.

Methodology

The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the swallowing status in stage III/IV laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma and its influence on treatment decision. We evaluated all treatment naïve patients who were referred to the swallowing clinic in 2017 (Jan–Dec) for assessment of swallowing prior to treatment initiation.

Results

One hundred patients satisfied the eligibility criteria and were included in the study. The site and stage of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer cases were almost equal in number. Their median age was 58 years. Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) was done in all patients. 30% of the patients only had swallowing difficulties. Only advanced T-stage (p = 0.04) had an influence on the pretreatment swallowing status. Thirty-seven patients required nasogastric tube (NGT) for feeding. By 2 month post-treatment completion, most patients on NGT could resume oral feeding.

Conclusions

Pretreatment swallowing assessment alone did not significantly seem to influence our decisions for organ preservation treatment. However, patients with aspiration could be identified and managed appropriately. Most patients on NGT could resume oral feeds post-treatment completion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Granell J, Garrido L, Millas T, Gutierrez-Fonseca R (2012) Management of oropharyngeal Dysphagia in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer. Int J Otolaryngol 2012:157630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Article O (2019) Swallowing function in patients with head and neck cancer prior to treatment. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126:371–377

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clarke P, Radford K, Coffey M, Stewart M (2016) Speech and swallow rehabilitation in head and neck cancer: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines 130:176–180

    Google Scholar 

  4. Denaro N, Merlano MC, Russi EG (2013) Dysphagia in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: pretreatment Evaluation, Predictive Factors, and Assessment during Radio-Chemotherapy. Recommendations. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 6(3):117–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Patterson JM (2019) Late effects of organ preservation treatment on swallowing and voice; presentation, assessment, and screening. Front Oncol 9:401

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Russi EG, Corvò R, Merlotti A, Alterio D, Franco P, Pergolizzi S et al (2012) Swallowing dysfunction in head and neck cancer patients treated by radiotherapy: review and recommendations of the supportive task group of the Italian Association of Radiation Oncology. Cancer Treat Rev 38(8):1033–1049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hutcheson KA, Lewin JS (2012) Functional outcomes after chemoradiotherapy of laryngeal and pharyngeal cancers. Curr Oncol Rep 14(2):158–165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Coffey M, Tolley N (2015) Swallowing after laryngectomy. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 23(3):202–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Martin-harris B, Michel Y, Castell DO, Carolina S (2005) Physiologic model of oropharyngeal swallowing revisited. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 133(2):234–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Farneti D, Fattori B, Bastiani L (2017) The endoscopic evaluation of the oral phase of swallowing (Oral-FEES, O-FEES): a pilot study of clinical use of a new procedure. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 37(3):201–206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Farneti D, Genovese E (2019) The endoscopic evaluation of the oesophageal phase of swallowing (E-FEES): perspective in a audiological-phoniatric setting. Hearing Balance Commun 17(3):197–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Aviv JE (2000) Prospective, randomized outcome study of endoscopy versus modified barium swallow in patients with dysphagia. Laryngoscope 110(4):563–574

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fattori B, Giusti P, Mancini V et al (2016) Comparison between videofluoroscopy, fiberoptic endoscopy and scintigraphy for diagnosis of oro-pharyngeal dysphagia. Confronto tra videofluoroscopia, endoscopia a fibre ottiche e scintigrafia per la diagnosi di disfagia oro-faringea. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 36(5):395–402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yoon JA, Kim SH, Jang MH, Kim SD, Shin YB (2019) Correlations between aspiration and pharyngeal residue scale scores for fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation and videofluoroscopy. Yonsei Med J 60(12):1181–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Giraldo-Cadavid LF, Leal-Leaño LR et al (2017) Accuracy of endoscopic and videofluoroscopic evaluations of swallowing for oropharyngeal dysphagia. Laryngoscope 127(9):2002–2010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Karnel MP, MacCracken E, Moran WJ, Vokes EE, Haraf DJ, Panje WR (1994) Swallowing function following multispeciality organ preservation treatment of advanced head and neck cancer. Oncol Rep 1:597–601

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pearson BW (1981) Subtotal laryngectomy. Laryngoscope 91(11):1904–1912

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Leipzig B (1980) Neoglottic reconstruction following total laryngectomy: a reappraisal. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 89(6 Pt 1):534–537

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Langmore SE, Schatz K, Olsen N (1988) Fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing safety: a new procedure. Dysphagia 2(4):216–219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rosenbek JC, Robbins JA, Roecker EB, Coyle JL, Wood JL (1996) A penetration-aspiration scale. Dysphagia 11(2):93–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Deutschmann MW, McDonough A, Dort JC, Dort E, Nakoneshny S, Matthews TW (2012) Fiber-optic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES): predictor of swallowing-related complications in the head and neck cancer population. Head Neck 35(7):974–979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. D’Cruz AK, Chaukar DA, Gupta T (2012) Guidelines for head and neck cancers. Tata Memorial Center, Mumbai

    Google Scholar 

  23. D’cruz A, Lin T, Anand AK et al (2013) Consensus recommendations for management of head and neck cancer in Asian countries: a review of international guidelines. Oral Oncol 49(9):872–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lefebvre JL, Ang KK (2009) Larynx preservation consensus panel. Larynx preservation clinical trial design: key issues and recommendations–a consensus panel summary. Head Neck 31(4):429–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Joshi P, Joshi A, Norohna V, Chaturvedi P, Patil V, Agarwal JP et al (2017) Role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced carcinoma of the hypopharynx and larynx. South Asian J Cancer 6:15–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Warnecke T, Oelenberg S, Teismann I, Hamacher C, Lohmann H, Ringelstein EB, Dziewas R (2010) Endoscopic characteristics and levodopa responsiveness of swallowing function in progressive supranuclear palsy. Movement Disord 25(9):1239–1245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dziewas R, Auf dem Brinke M, Birkmann U et al (2019) Safety and clinical impact of FEES results of the FEES-registry. Neurol Res Pract 1:16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Stenson KM, MacCracken E, List M, Haraf DJ, Brockstein B, Weichselbaum R, Vokes EE (2000) Swallowing function in patients with head and neck cancer prior to treatment. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126(3):371–377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Muz J, Mathog RH, Hamlet SL, Davis LP, Kling GA (1991) Objective assessment of swallowing function in head and neck cancer patients. Head Neck 13:33–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Grover RK, Negi P, George UB, Varghese Sachdeva AJ, Kingsley PA (2018) Predictors of postradiation swallowing dysfunction in head-and-neck cancer. CHRISMED J Health Res 5(3):2008–2213

    Google Scholar 

  31. Frowen J, Hons B, Cotton S, Corry J, Perry A (2010) Impact of demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment factors on swallowing after (chemo) radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Head Neck 32(4):513–528

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Logemann JA, Rademaker AW, Pauloski BR, Lazarus CL, Mittal BB, Brockstein B et al (2006) Site of disease and treatmentprotocol as correlates of swallowing function in patients with head and neck cancer treated with chemoradiation. Head Neck 28:64–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Starmer HH, Gourin CG, Lua LL, Burkhead L (2011) Pretreatment swallowing assessment in head and neck cancer patients. Laryngoscope 121(6):1208–1211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Eisbruch A, Lyden T, Bradford CR et al (2002) Objective assessment of swallowing dysfunction and aspiration after radiation concurrent with chemotherapy for head and neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 53:23–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study concepts: ST, DC, and AB. Study design: ST and AM. Data acquisition: AM, NM, and AC. Quality control of data and algorithms: ST. Statistical analysis: ST. Manuscript preparation: AB, ST, AM, NM, AC, and DC. Manuscript editing: ST and DC. Manuscript reviewing: AB, ST, AM, NM, AC, and DC.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shivakumar Thiagarajan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Institute ethical committee clearance taken for this study (Project Number-3308). All received the standard of care for their condition and was as per the ethical standards.

Informed consent

No identifying information about participants is available in the article. However, all patients have given consent for the treatment they have received.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Balaji, A., Thiagarajan, S., Mallik, A. et al. Results of pretreatment swallowing evaluation in patients with stage III/IV laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 278, 3011–3018 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06460-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06460-3

Keywords

Navigation