Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Audiological benefit and subjective satisfaction with the ADHEAR hearing system in children with unilateral conductive hearing loss

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The ADHEAR system (MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria) is a new adhesive bone conduction hearing aid. This study evaluates the audiological benefit and subjective satisfaction as well as the manageability in everyday life in children with unilateral conductive hearing loss.

Methods

Ten children with unilateral hearing loss of different origin were included in the study. The audiological assessment included sound field audiometry and speech intelligibility in quiet and in noise, which was tested unaided and after 4 weeks of wearing the hearing system. Subjective benefit and satisfaction with the system was assessed using the SSQ for parents. With a second system-specific questionnaire, suitability for everyday use and quality of life were queried.

Results

With ADHEAR, speech perception in quiet improved by 44%. The word recognition score in noise improved from 11.7% in the unaided situation to 46.7% with the ADHEAR system. The SSQ for parents demonstrates a subjective benefit and satisfaction with the system.

Conclusion

ADHEAR is an effective treatment option for children with unilateral conductive hearing loss. Especially children who are not eligible for semi-implantable hearing systems or do not accept hearing devices on a softband can benefit from this device.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hakansson B et al (1985) The bone-anchored hearing aid. Principal design and a psychoacoustical evaluation. Acta Otolaryngol 100(3):229–239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zarowski AJ et al (2011) Headbands, testbands and softbands in preoperative testing and application of bone-anchored devices in adults and children. AdvOtorhinolaryngol 71:124–131

    Google Scholar 

  3. Reinfeldt S et al (2015) New developments in bone-conduction hearing implants: a review. Med Devices (Auckl) 8:79–93

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dahm V et al (2019) A Randomized cross-over trial comparing a pressure-free, adhesive to a conventional bone conduction hearing device. OtolNeurotol 40(5):571–577

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hahlbrock K-H (1953) ÜberSprachaudiometrie und neueWörterteste. ArchivfürOhrenNasenKehlkopfheilkunde 162:394–431

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Weissgerber T et al (2012) German Oldenburg Sentence Test for Children: a useful speech audiometry tool for hearing-impaired children at kindergarten and school age. Folia PhoniatrLogop 64(5):227–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Noble W et al (2013) A short form of the speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale suitable for clinical use: the SSQ12. Int J Audiol 52(6):409–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Verhagen CV et al (2008) The Baha Softband. A new treatment for young children with bilateral congenital aural atresia. Int J PediatrOtorhinolaryngol 72(10):1455–1459

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Neumann K et al (2019) A new adhesive bone conduction hearing system effectively treats conductive hearing loss in children. Int J PediatrOtorhinolaryngol 122:117–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Osborne MS et al (2019) First pediatric experience with a novel, adhesive adapter retained, bone conduction hearing aid system. OtolNeurotol 40(9):1199–1207

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zernotti M (2019) The adhesive bone conduction hearing system in children with Atresia and Microtia, in ESPCI 2019. Bucharest, Romania

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gavilan J (2019) Comparison of the non-invasive adhesive bone conduction system with passive transcutaneous bone conduction implants in children, in EPSCI2019. Bucharest, Romania

    Google Scholar 

  13. Weiss R et al (2020) A new adhesive bone conduction hearing system as a treatment option for transient hearing loss after middle ear surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 277(3):751–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gawliczek T et al (2018) Unilateral and bilateral audiological benefit with an adhesively attached, noninvasive bone conduction hearing system. OtolNeurotol 39(8):1025–1030

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dahm V et al (2018) First results with a new, pressure-free, adhesive bone conduction hearing aid. OtolNeurotol 39(6):748–754

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Hirth.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author Daniel Hirth and Roxanne Weiss received a financial support for attending the symposium “Deutscher HNO-Kongress” 2019 in Berlin. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and/or animals rights

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards by the ethics committee of the medical faculty Frankfurt (EC code 92/17) and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hirth, D., Weiss, R., Stöver, T. et al. Audiological benefit and subjective satisfaction with the ADHEAR hearing system in children with unilateral conductive hearing loss. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 278, 2781–2788 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06364-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06364-2

Keywords

Navigation