Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Efficacy of Rhino-Protect ointment after endoscopic sinus surgery: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study

  • Rhinology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Blocking airflow into the sinonasal cavity after surgery may help to keep the cavity moist and thus decrease postoperative crusting. Here we investigated the efficacy of Rhino-Protect ointment following endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS).

Subjects and methods

A total of 93 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis who underwent identical ESS were enrolled. After surgery, all patients were instructed to perform nasal saline irrigation and deliver a nasal spray to each nostril, then to apply Rhino-Protect ointment to one nostril only; the other nostril served as a control. Subjective symptoms, postoperative Lund–Kennedy (LK) endoscopic scores, and adverse reactions 14 and 28 days after treatment were evaluated.

Results

The Rhino-Protect ointment significantly reduced pain (p = 0.015 at 28 days), dryness (p = 0.009 at 14 days and p = 0.045 at 28 days), and crusting (p = 0.047 at 14 days), and was associated with significantly lower LK scores 14 and 28 days after treatment (p = 0.037 and p = 0.007, respectively). Statistically significant differences were noted in the LK edema subscore at 14 days (p = 0.043) and in LK crusting subscores at 14 and 28 days (p = 0.005 and p = 0.006, respectively). No patient reported any serious adverse event associated with Rhino-Protect use.

Conclusion

Applying Rhino-Protect after ESS significantly reduced the formation of edema and crusts, leading to improving the patients’ discomfort for pain, dryness, and crust.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thaler ER (2009) Postoperative care after endoscopic sinus surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128:1204–1206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rudmik L, Soler ZM, Orlandi RR, Stewart MG, Bhattacharyya N, Kennedy DW et al (2011) Early postoperative are following endoscopic sinus surgery: an evidence-based review with recommendations. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 1:417–430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bugten V, Nordgard S, Steinsvag S (2006) The effects of debridement after endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 116:2037–2043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shi L, Feng Y, Cui W, Yan K, Lv M, Hong Z et al (2015) Effect evaluation of repeated debridement after endoscopic sinus surgery. Int J Clin Exp Med 8:928–933

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Schwetz S, Olze H, Melchisedech S, Grigorov A, Latza R (2004) Efficacy of pollen blocker cream in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130:979–984

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Geisthoff UW, Blum A, Rupp-Classen M, Plinkert PK (2005) Lipid-based nose ointment for allergic rhinitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 133:754–761

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Li Y, Wang D, Liu Q, Liu J (2013) Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study of efficacy of pollen blocker cream for perennial allergic rhinitis. Am J Rhinol Allergy 27:299–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Li Y, Cheng L, Chen X, Yang B, Wang D (2015) Efficacy evaluation of a pollen blocker cream against dust-mite allergy: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial. Am J Rhinol Allergy 29:e129–e133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Miwa M, Nakajima N, Matsunaga M, Watanabe K (2006) Measurement of water loss in human nasal mucosa. Am J Rhinol 20:453–455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim SL, Kim SD, Na HS, Kim JW, Yi KI, Mun SJ, Cho KS (2019) The efficacy of cotton ball packing after endoscopic sinus surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Auris Nasus Larynx 46:742–747

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. LanzaKennedy DCDW (1997) Adult rhinosinusitis defined. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117:S1–S7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lund VJ, Mackay IS (1993) Staging in rhinosinusitis. Rhinology 31:183–184

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lund VJ, Kennedy DW (1997) Staging for rhinosinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117:S35–S40

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wei CC, Adappa ND, Cohen NA (2013) Use of topical nasal therapies in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope 123:2347–2359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rabago D, Zgierska A, Mundt M, Barrett B, Bobula J, Maberry R (2002) Efficacy of daily hypertonic saline nasal irrigation among patients with sinusitis: a randomized controlled trial. J Fam Pract 51:1049–1055

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Junker JP, Kamel RA, Caterson EJ, Eriksson E (2013) Clinical impact upon wound healing and inflammation in moist, wet, and dry environments. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 2:348–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Antisdel JL, Matijasec JL, Ting JY, Sindwani R (2011) Microporous polysaccharide hemospheres do not increase synechiae after sinus surgery: randomized controlled study. Am J Rhinol Allergy 25:268–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cho KS, Park CH, Hong SL, Kim MJ, Kim JY, Kim YW et al (2015) Comparative analysis of Cutanplast and Spongostan nasal packing after endoscopic sinus surgery: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272:1699–1705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Brown AC, Slocum PC, Putthoff SL, Wallace WE, Foresman BH (1994) Exogenous lipoid pneumonia due to nasal application of petroleum jelly. Chest 105:968–969

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was financially supported by Hanwha Pharma Co., Ltd. (Seoul, South Korea) and Dr. Theiss Naturwaren GmbH (Homburg, Germany).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chang-Hoon Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 916 kb)

Supplementary file2 (XLSX 140 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cho, KS., Kim, S.W., Kim, J.K. et al. Efficacy of Rhino-Protect ointment after endoscopic sinus surgery: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 278, 109–115 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06265-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06265-4

Keywords

Navigation