Etiologies of olfactory dysfunction in a pediatric population: based on a retrospective analysis of data from an outpatient clinic

Abstract

Purpose

Although the prevalence of olfactory dysfunction in children is thought to be lower compared to adults, little is known about the actual frequency of etiologies of smell dysfunction in children. Aim of the study was (i) to describe the epidemiology of olfactory dysfunction in a pediatric population and (ii) to compare the distribution of etiologies to adults.

Material and methods

Data of patients consulting a smell and taste clinic between 2000 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Frequency of major causes of olfactory dysfunction was examined with a focus on the pediatric population.

Results

A total of 7153 patients (164 children) were included in the analysis. Most children presented with congenital olfactory dysfunction (67%), or head-trauma (12%). In contrast, the cumulative frequency of olfactory loss associated with sinonasal disorders or acute infections of the upper airways was 6%. The frequency of etiologies of olfactory dysfunction changed with age: While the frequency of patients with congenital anosmia decreased, the frequency of causes related to infections of the upper respiratory tract and idiopathic causes increased.

Conclusion

About 2/3 of olfactory dysfunction in children are congenital while 1/3 is acquired. The frequency of etiologies causing olfactory dysfunction change significantly from children to an adult population.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. 1.

    Oozeer NB, Forbes K, Clement AW, Kubba H (2011) Management of paediatric olfactory dysfunction: how we do it. Clin Otolaryngol 36(5):494–499

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Karstensen HG, Tommerup N (2012) Isolated and syndromic forms of congenital anosmia. Clin Genet 81(3):210–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0004.2011.01776.x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Schriever VA, Gellrich J, von der Hagen M, Hummel T (2018) Acquired olfactory dysfunction in children and adolescents: a systematic review of the literature. Chem Senses 43(8):571–581. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjy046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Oleszkiewicz A, Schriever VA, Croy I, Hahner A, Hummel T (2019) Updated Sniffin’ Sticks normative data based on an extended sample of 9139 subjects. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 276(3):719–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-5248-1

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Cameron EL (2018) Olfactory perception in children. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 4(1):57–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wjorl.2018.02.002

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hauser LJ, Jensen EL, Mirsky DM, Chan KH (2018) Pediatric anosmia: a case series. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 110:135–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.05.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Lotsch J, Hummel T (2019) Clinical usefulness of self-rated olfactory performance-a data science-based assessment of 6000 patients. Chem Senses 44(6):357–364. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjz029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Bakker K, Catroppa C, Anderson V (2014) Olfactory dysfunction in pediatric traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. J Neurotrauma 31(4):308–314. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2013.3045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Keller A, Malaspina D (2013) Hidden consequences of olfactory dysfunction: a patient report series. BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord 13(1):8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6815-13-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Fark T, Hummel T (2013) Olfactory disorders: distribution according to age and gender in 3400 patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270(2):777–779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2108-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Goodspeed RB, Gent JF, Catalanotto FA (1987) Chemosensory dysfunction. Clinical evaluation results from a taste and smell clinic. Postgrad Med 81(1):251–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.1987.11699680(page 260)

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Loo AT, Youngentob SL, Kent PF, Schwob JE (1996) The aging olfactory epithelium: neurogenesis, response to damage, and odorant-induced activity. Int J Dev Neurosci 14(7–8):881–900

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study did not receive funding.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valentin Alexander Schriever.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine of the TU Dresden covering anonymized retrospective and pooled analyses. The study followed the Declaration of Helsinki.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schriever, V.A., Hummel, T. Etiologies of olfactory dysfunction in a pediatric population: based on a retrospective analysis of data from an outpatient clinic. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 277, 3213–3216 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06087-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Olfactory dysfunction
  • Children
  • Epidemiology of olfactory dysfunction
  • Smell loss