Skip to main content
Log in

Anatomical landmarks for cochlear implantatıon in ossifıed cochleas

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In this study, we aimed to introduce the facial nerve as a new anatomical landmark which can be used in ossified cochleas during cochlear implantation. We also set out to define a safe line to preserve the internal auditory canal (IAC) while drilling the basal turn of the cochlea.

Methods

Thirty patients who had temporal computed tomography (CT) were studied. The distances from the facial nerve and the round window to the IAC, carotid artery, and jugular bulb were measured in the reformatted CT images. We have created a line in the direction of the stapedial tendon from the round window to the IAC and called it ROWIAC (Round window–IAC) line. We have investigated whether this line intersects the IAC and measured the distances from this line to the IAC.

Results

Fifty-four temporal CT scans were included to the study. The mean distances from the facial nerve to the IAC, carotid artery, and jugular bulb were 8.8 ± 0.9, 15.0 ± 2.0, and 12.2 ± 2.9 mm, respectively. The mean distances from the round window to these structures were 3.8 ± 0.7, 9.4 ± 2.2, and 8.3 ± 2.9 mm, respectively. ROWIAC line did not intersect the IAC in any of the patients. The mean distance between this line and the IAC was 0.8 ± 0.4 mm.

Conclusion

We propose that facial nerve and ROWIAC line can be used as potential landmarks during cochlear implantation in ossified cochleas to protect the adjacent neurovascular structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Paparella MM, Sugiura S (1967) The pathology of suppurative labyrinthitis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 76:554–586

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Suga F, Lindsay JR (1977) Labyrinthitis ossificans. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 86:17–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Smullen JL, Balkany TJ (2005) Implantation of the ossified cochlea. Oper Tech Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 16:117–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaya S, Paparella MM, Cureoglu S (2016) Pathologic Findings of the Cochlea in Labyrinthitis Ossificans Associated with the Round Window Membrane. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 155(4):635–640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. deSouza C, Paparella MM, Schachern P, Yoon TH (1991) Pathology of labyrinthine ossification. J Laryngol Otol 105:621–624

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Roland JT Jr, Coelho DH, Pantelides H, Waltzman SB (2008) Partial and double-array implantationof the ossified cochlea. Otol Neurotol 29(8):1068–1075

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Balkany TJ, Gantz B, Nadol JB (1988) Multichannel cochlear implants inpartially ossified cochleas. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 97:3–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gantz BJ, McCabe BF, Tyler RS (1988) Use of multi-channel cochlearimplants in obstructed and obliterated cochleas. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 98:72–81

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hodges AV, Balkany TJ, Gomez-Marin O et al (1999) Speech recognitionafter implantation of the ossified cochlea. Am J Otol 20:453–456

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yan T, Zong F, Ma X et al (2019) Cochlear implantation in patients with ossified cochleas. Am J Otol 40(2):183–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Singla A, Sahni D, Gupta AK, Loukas M, Aggarwal A (2014) Surgical anatomy of round window and itsimplications for cochlear implantation. Clin Anat 27:331–336

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Singla A, Gupta T, Sahni D, Gupta AK, Aggarwal A (2017) Topography of neurovascular structures in relation toround window and how it relates to cochlear implantation. Surg Radiol Anat 39(12):1309–1316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Coelho DH, Roland JT Jr (2012) Implanting obstructed and malformed cochleae. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 45(1):91–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Leal Mde C, Caldas Neto Sda S (2015) The anatomical orientation of the middle turn of the cochlea: importance during surgical implantation of the ossified cochlea. Otol Neurotol 36(3):406–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wysocki J, Skarzynski H (1998) Distance between the cochlea andadjacent structures related to cochlear implant surgery. Surg Radiol Anat 20:267–271

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ying YL, Lin JW, Oghalai JS, Williamson RA (2013) Cochlear implant electrodemisplacement: incidence, evaluation, and management. Laryngoscope 123:757–766

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Nevoux J, Loundon N, Leboulanger N, Roger G, Ducou Le PointeGarabedian HEN (2010) Cochlear implant in the carotid canal. Case report and literaturereview. Int J of Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 74:701–703

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jain S, Gaurkar S, Deshmukh PT et al (2019) Applied anatomy of round window and adjacent structures of tympanum related to cochlear implantation. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 85(4):435–446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mehanna AM, Gamaleldin OA, Fathalla MF (2019) The misplaced cochlear implant electrode array. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 117:96–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jiang Y, Chen Y, Yao J, Tian Y, Su L, Li Y (2015) Anatomic assessment of petrous ınternal carotid artery, facial nerve, and cochlea through the anterior transpetrosal approach. J Craniofac Surg 26(7):2180–2183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Ms. Cigdem Altunok, Department of Bioistatistics, Yeditepe University School of Medicine, for her support with the statistical analyses.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rasim Yilmazer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional ethics committee and with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yilmazer, R., Karatay, E., Akbulut, S. et al. Anatomical landmarks for cochlear implantatıon in ossifıed cochleas. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 277, 3301–3306 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06044-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06044-1

Keywords

Navigation