Abstract
Purpose
To investigate skin-related postoperative outcomes following a tissue preservation technique in percutaneous hydroxyapatite-coated bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) abutment implantation.
Methods
A retrospective medical records review of adult patients, who underwent single-stage BAHA implantation between July 2013 and November 2017 at a tertiary centre was conducted. Surgical procedures were performed by a single surgeon using a linear incision soft tissue preservation technique. Patients were reviewed at 1 week, 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and annually postoperatively and soft tissue reactions were graded using Holger’s score
Results
There were 102 patients included with a slight female preponderance (female:male 56:46). There were 586 follow-up episodes during the study period. From the recorded follow-up episodes, Holger’s scores were documented as follows: Holger score 0 (89%); 1 (7%); 2 (2%); 3 (1.9%). Three patients (3%) required peri-abutment soft tissue excision (Holger 3) and insertion of longer abutments. One patient (1%) reported atraumatic implant loss. The BAHA was re-implanted in two patients (2%) due to traumatic dislodgement. There was a statistically significant association (p = 0.009) when the mean time to minor skin complications was compared with mean time to a significant skin reaction.
Conclusion
Tissue preservation technique is the procedure of choice for BAHA abutment implant surgery. It confers excellent soft tissue outcomes and an excellent implant survival rate.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tjellstrom A, Lindstrom J, Hallen O et al (1981) Osseointegrated titanium implants in the temporal bone. A clinical study on bone-anchored hearing aids. Am J Otol 2(4):304–310
Medical Advisory Secretariat Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series (2002) Bone anchored hearing aid. https://www.health.gov.on.ca/english/providers/program/mas/tech/reviews/pdf/rev_baha_090102.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2019
Cochlear Candidate Selection Guide (2018) https://www.cochlear.com. Accessed 18 Dec 2018
Shirazi MA, Marzo SJ, Leonetti JP (2006) Perioperative complications with the bone-anchored hearing aid. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 134:236–239
Woolford TJ, Morris DP, Saeed SR, Rothera MP (1999) The implant-site split-skin graft technique for the bone-anchored hearing aid. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 24:177–180
Fontaine N, Hemar P, Schultz P et al (2014) BAHA implant: implantation technique and complications. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 131:69–74
van de Berg R, Stokroos RJ, Hof JR et al (2010) Bone-anchored hearing aid: a comparison of surgical techniques. Otol Neurotol 31:129–135
de Wolf MJF, Hol MKS, Huygen PLM et al (2008) Clinical outcome of the simplified surgical technique for BAHA implantation. Otol Neurotol 29:1100–1108
Holgers KM, Tjellström A, Bjursten LM, Erlandsson BE (1988) Soft tissue reactions around percutaneous implants: a clinical study of soft tissue reactions around skin-penetrating titanium implants for bone anchored hearing aids. Am J Otol 9:56–59
Wilkie MD, Chakravarthy KM, Mamais C, Temple RH (2014) Osseointegrated hearing implant surgery using a novel hydroxyapatite-coated concave abutment design. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 151(6):1014–1019. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599814551150
Mohamad S, Khan I, Hey SY et al (2016) A systematic review on skin complications of bone-anchored hearing aids in relation to surgical techniques. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273:559–565
Verheij E, Bezdjian A, Grolman W, Thomeer GGXM (2016) A systematic review on complications of tissue preservation surgical techniques in percutaneous bone conduction hearing devices. Otol Neurotol 37:829–837. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000001091
Kiringoda R, Lustig LR (2013) A meta-analysis of the complications associated with osseointegrated hearing aids. Otol Neurotol 34:774–790
Anderson JM (2001) Biological responses to materials. Annu Rev Mater Res 31(1):81–110
Jarabin J, Bere Z, Hartmann P et al (2015) Laser-Doppler microvascular measurements in the peri-implant areas of different osseointegrated bone conductor implant systems. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272:3655–3662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3429-0
Dalmau-Galofre J, Tamarit-Conejeros JM, Murcia-Puchades V, Pons-Rocher F, Pastor-Canicio G (2009) Baha: a new longitudinal incision with fixture out of the incision. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 60(4):278–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otorri.2009.02.001
Strijbos RM, den Besten CA, Mylanus EA, Hol MK (2016) Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: inside or outside the line of incision? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273(11):3713–3722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4020-7
Goldman RA, Georgolios A, Shaia WT (2013) The punch method for bone anchored hearing aid placement. Otolaringol Head Neck Surg 148:878–880
Gordon SA, Coelho DH (2015) Minimally invasive surgery for osseointegrated auditory implants: a comparison of linear versus punch techniques. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 152(6):1089–1093
Dumon T, Medina M, Sperling NM (2015) Punch and Drill: implantation of bone anchored hearing device through a minimal skin punch incision versus implantation with dermatome and soft tissue reduction. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 125:199–206
Johansson M, Holmberg M (2015) Design and clinical evaluation of MIPS—a new perspective on tissue preservation. White Pap Oticon Medical, Askim, Sweden 2015. October, Rep No M524252.
Calon TG, van Hoof M, van der Berge H et al (2018) Minimally invasive ponto surgery versus the linear incision technique with soft tissue preservation for bone conduction hearing implants: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Otol Neurotol 39:882–893. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000001852
Hobson JC, Roper AJ, Andrew R, Rothera MP, Hill P, Green KM (2010) Complications of bone-anchored hearing aid implantation. J Laryngol Otol 124:132–136
Dun CA, Faber HT, de Wolf MJ, Mylanus EA, Cremers CW, Hol MK (2012) Assessment of more than 1,000 implanted percutaneous bone conduction devices: skin reactions and implant survival. Otol Neurotol 33:192–198
Johansson M, Holmberg M, Hulcrantz M (2018) Bone anchored hearing implant surgery with tissue preservation—a systematic literature review. https://www.oticonmedical.com/-/media/medical/main/files/for-professionals/bahs/surgical-materials/papers/eng/literature-review---tissue-preservation---english---m52107.pdf?la=en. Accessed 17 Jul 2018
den Besten CA, Bosman AJ, Nelissen RC, Mylanus EAM, Hol MK (2016) Controlled clinical trial on bone-anchored hearing implants and a surgical technique with soft tissue preservation. Otol Neurotol 37:504–512
Nelissen RC, den Besten CA, Mylanus EA, Hol MK (2016) Stability, survival, and tolerability of a 4.5-mm-wide bone-anchored hearing implant: 6-month data from a randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273:105–111
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interests.
Ethical approval
For this type of study formal consent is not required. We deemed this study to be service evaluation and therefore we did not seek research ethics committee approval.
Informed consent
This was a retrospective records review and as such informed consent was not sought from all the patients whose records we reviewed. Furthermore, the data used in our work is anonymised and there is no patient identifiable information. Written consent for the use of clinical photographs was sought and granted by the patients whose photographs are used in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kanzara, T., Walijee, H., Badar Sheikh, R. et al. Long-term soft tissue outcomes for hydroxyapatite-coated bone-anchored hearing implant surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 276, 3067–3072 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05609-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05609-z