Skip to main content
Log in

Wireless inertial measurement unit (IMU)-based posturography

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Classical posturography techniques have been recently enhanced by the use of different motion tracking devices, but for technical reasons they are not used to track directly the body spatial position of a subject.

Objective

To describe and clinically evaluate a wireless inertial measurement unit-based mobile system to track body position changes.

Methods

The developed system used a calculus transformation method using the acceleration data corrected by Kalman and Butterworth filters to output position data. A prospective non-randomized clinical study involving 15 healthy subjects was performed to evaluate the agreement between the confidence ellipse areas synchronously measured by the new developed system and a classical posturography system while performing a modified clinical test of sensory interaction in balance.

Results

The overall intra-class correlation index was 0.93 (CI 0.89, 0.96). Grouped by conditions, under conditions 1–4, Pearson’s correlation was 0.604, 0.78, 0.882, and 0.81, respectively.

Conclusion

The developed wireless inertial measurement unit-based posturography system was valid for tracking the sway variances in normal subjects under habitual clinical testing conditions. Further studies are needed to validate this system on patients and also under other posture conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berg K, Norman K (2009) Functional assessment of balance and gait. Clin Geriatr Med 12:705–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Park Lee (2014) Validity and reliability of balance assessment software using the Nintendo Wii balance board: usability and validation. J NeuroEng Rehabil 11:99

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Balaguer-García R, Pitarch-Corresa S, Baydal-Bertomeu J (2012) Static posturography with dynamic tests. Usefulness of biomechanical parameters in assessing vestibular patients. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 63:332–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rey-Martinez J, Pérez-Fernández N (2016) Open source posturography. Acta Otolaryngol 136(12):1225–1229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vališ M, Dršata J, Kalfeřt D (2012) Computerised static posturography in neurology. Cent Eur J Med 7:317–322

    Google Scholar 

  6. Black F (2001) What can posturography tell us about vestibular function? Ann N Y Acad Sci 942:446–464

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Norré M (1995) Head extension effect in static posturography. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 104:570–573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brandt T, Dieterich M, Strupp M (2005) Vertigo and dizziness: common complaints. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  9. Clark R, Bryant A, Pua Y, McCrory P, Bennell K, Hunt M (2010) Validity and reliability of the Nintendo Wii Balance Board for assessment of standing balance. Gait Posture 31:307–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Allum J, Adkin A (2003) Improvements in trunk sway observed for stance and gait tasks during recovery from an acute unilateral peripheral vestibular deficit. Audiol Neurootol. 8:286–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Faraldo-García A, Santos-Pérez S, Labella-Caballero T, Crujeiras R, Soto-Varela A (2013) Age-adjusted normality patterns for posturography by Sway Star system. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270:3169–3175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rey-Martínez J, Boleas-Aguirre M, Pérez N (2005) Postural analysis of the test “timed-up-and-go” in patients with vertigo. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 56:107–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Newton I (1687) Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica: public domain. https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/28233

  14. Ostebee A, Zorn P (1997) Calculus from graphical, numerical, and symbolic points of view. Harcourt College Pub, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hol MK, Schon TB (2016) Using inertial sensors for position and orientation estimation. Found Trends Signal Process 11(1–2):1–153

    Google Scholar 

  16. Allum J, Zamani F, Adkin A, Ernst A (2002) Differences between trunk sway characteristics on a foam support surface and on the Equitest ankle-sway-referenced support surface. Gait Posture. 16(3):264–270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tadayon P, Felderhoff T, Knopp A, Staude G (2016) Fusion of inertial and magnetic sensors for 3D position and orientation estimation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 3362–3365

  18. Shumway-Cook A, Horak F (1986) Assessing the influence of sensory interaction of balance. Suggestion from the field. Phys Ther 66:1548–1550

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Domènech-Vadillo E (2019) Normative data for static balance testing in healthy individuals using open source computerized posturography. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 276:41–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shrout P, Fleiss J (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420–428

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Koo T, Li M (2016) A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 15:155–163

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Bland J, Altman D (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 8:307–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fujimoto C, Kamogashira T, Kinoshita M, Egami N, Sugasawa K, Demura S et al (2014) Power spectral analysis of postural sway during foam posturography in patients with peripheral vestibular dysfunction. Otol Neurotol. 35(10):317–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rossi-Izquierdo M, Soto-Varela A, Ernst A, Rubio-Rodríguez J, Santos-Pérez S, Sesar Á et al (2016) What could posturography tell us about balance problems in Parkinson’s disease? Otol Neurotol 37(9):326–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Faraldo-García A, Soto-Varela A, Santos-Pérez S (2015) Is it possible to shorten examination time in posture control studies? Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 66(3):154–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Assessment, A. A. N. (1993) Assessment: posturography. Report of the therapeutics and technology assessment subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 43(6):1261–1264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wrisley D, Stephens M, Mosley S (2007) Learning effects of repetitive administrations of the sensory organization test in healthy young adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 88:1049–1054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge Rey-Martinez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Because not medical device CE mark measurement non-invasive devices were used on humans for this study, local government ethic committee (CEIC-Donostia) was required and obtained for this study.

Statement of human rights

This clinical study was designed and performed in accordance with the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Valldeperes, A., Altuna, X., Martinez-Basterra, Z. et al. Wireless inertial measurement unit (IMU)-based posturography. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 276, 3057–3065 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05607-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05607-1

Keywords

Navigation