Advertisement

Influence of olfactory dysfunction on the perception of food

  • Y. Zang
  • P. Han
  • S. Burghardt
  • A. Knaapila
  • V. Schriever
  • T. HummelEmail author
Rhinology

Abstract

Purpose

Eating-related problems are among the most frequent issues in olfactory impairment, causing a noticeable loss of quality of life for some of the affected persons. To what extent olfactory dysfunction impacts on the sensory perception of food is less explored. The aim of the present study was to examine the impact of olfactory dysfunction on the perception of food aromas, as well as the perception of the “basic tastes” salty, sour, sweet, and bitter.

Methods

Eighty-nine participants were recruited for the prospective study. Group 1 consisted of thoroughly examined patients with olfactory dysfunction (n = 48, mean age = 60.0 years), group 2 consisted of people with normal olfactory function (n = 41, mean age = 50.4 years). First, olfactory and gustatory functions were assessed for all participants with the help of the “Sniffin’Sticks” battery and the “taste strips” test. Second, food odors were rated for their pleasantness, intensity, familiarity and desirability. Last, real food items were tasted orally and the intensity for basic taste qualities (sweet, bitter, salty, and sour) and pleasantness was rated. In addition, salivation was measured following exposure to the food odors.

Results

In comparison to controls, patients rated orthonasal food odors as less pleasant, intense, familiar, and less appetizing. “Taste strip” scores were significantly lower in patients (M = 9.56, SD = 2.76) as compared to controls (M = 10.88, SD = 1.89). In addition, ratings of food liking for chocolate and peanut were lower in patients compared to controls (chocolate: patients—M = 6.85, SD = 2.09, controls—M = 7.90, SD = 1.53; peanut: patients—M = 4.88, SD = 2.20, controls—M = 6.80, SD = 2.33). No significant differences were found regarding the comparison of the salivary flow rate in controls (M = 0.52 g/min, SD = 0.19) and patients (M = 0.50 SD = 0.17).

Conclusions

Changes in the perception of odors may change the perception of food with specific effects on food liking. Olfactory dysfunction affects gustatory function, indicating the central-nervous interaction between taste and smell. Still, olfactory dysfunction did not appear to affect patients’ salivary flow.

Keywords

Olfactory dysfunction Smell Eating Taste Flavor 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Han-Seok Seo, PhD for assisting in data acquisition. This research was supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft to TH (DFG HU411/18–1).

Funding

Source of financial support or funding: This research was supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft to TH (DFG HU411/18–1).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

This research received financial support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft to TH (DFG HU411/18–1). All other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human participants

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the Ethics committee of the Medical Faculty of the Technical University of Dresden(EK441102016). This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Hummel T, Nordin S (2005) Olfactory disorders and their consequences for quality of life. Acta Otolaryngol 125(2):116–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aschenbrenner K, Hummel C, Teszmer K et al (2008) The influence of olfactory loss on dietary behaviors. Laryngoscope. 118(1):135–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brillat-Savarin JA. La Physiologie du Goût ("Die Physiologie des Geschmacks oder Transcendentalgastronomische Betrachtungen, German 1865; translater Habs R, corrected Muehlgassner J) Edited by Leipzig, Philipp Reclam jun., 1826, p. chapter 8Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Spence C (2015) Multisensory flavor perception. Cell 161(1):24–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aschenbrenner K, Hummel C, Teszmer K, Krone F, Ishimaru T, Seo HS, Hummel T (2008) The influence of olfactory loss on dietary behaviors. Laryngoscope 118(1):135–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Croy Ilona, Nordin Steven (2014) Hummel T, Olfactory disorders and quality of life—an updated review. Chem Senses 39:185–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kremer Stefanie, Holthuysen Nancy, Boesveldt Sanne (2014) The influence of olfactory impairment in vital, independently living older persons on their eating behaviour and food liking. Food Qual Prefer 38:30–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Proserpio C, de Graaf C, Laureati M, Pagliarini E, Boesveldt S (2017) Impact of ambient odors on food intake, saliva production and appetite ratings. Physiol Behav 174:35–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bender G, Hummel T, Negoias S, Small DM (2009) Separate signals for orthonasal vs retronasal perception of food but not nonfood odors. Behav Neurosci 123(3):481–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hummel T, Sekinger B, Wolf SR, Pauli E, Kobal G, (1997) ‘Sniffin’ Sticks': olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odour identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold. Chem Senses. 22(1):39–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ehrenstein WH, Ehrenstein A (1999) Psychophysical methods. In: Windhorst U, Johansson H (eds) Modern techniques in neuroscience research. Springer, Berlin, pp 1211–1241Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bult JH, de Wijk RA, Hummel T (2007) Investigations on multimodal sensory integration: texture, taste, and ortho- and retronasal olfactory stimuli in concert. Neurosci Lett 411(1):6–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Landis BN, Welge-Luessen A, Bramerson A et al (2009) "Taste Strips" - a rapid, lateralized, gustatory bedside identification test based on impregnated filter papers. J Neurol 256(2):242–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ramaekers M, Boesveldt S, Lakemond C, Van Boekel M, Luning P (2014) Odors: appetizing or satiating? Development of appetite during odor exposure over time. Int J Obesity. 38(5):650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stevenson RJ (2010) An initial evaluation of the functions of human olfaction. Chem Senses 35(1):3–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hummel T, Whitcroft KL, Andrews P, et al. (2016) Position paper on olfactory dysfunction. Rhinology 56(1):0.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gudziol H, Rahneberg K, Burkert S (2007) Anosmics are more poorly able to taste than normal persons. Laryngo- rhino- otologie. 86(9):640–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Landis BN, Scheibe M, Weber C et al (2010) Chemosensory interaction: acquired olfactory impairment is associated with decreased taste function. J Neurol 257(8):1303–1308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shepherd GM (2006) Smell images and the flavour system in the human brain. Nature 444(7117):316–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mazzola L, Royet JP, Catenoix H, Montavont A, Isnard J, Mauguiere F (2017) Gustatory and olfactory responses to stimulation of the human insula. Ann Neurol 82(3):360–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kershaw JC, Running CA (2018) Conditioning of human salivary flow using a visual cue for sour candy. Arch Oral Biol 92:90–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pangborn RM, Witherly SA, Jones F (1979) Parotid and whole-mouth secretion in response to viewing, handling, and sniffing food. Perception 8(3):339–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nederkoorn C, de Wit T, Smulders FTY et al (2001) Experimental comparison of different techniques to measure saliva. Appetite 37:251–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Croy I, Nordin S, Hummel T (2014) Olfactory disorders and quality of life—an updated review. Chem Senses 39(3):185–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Manesse C, Ferdenzi C, Sabri M et al (2017) Dysosmia-associated changes in eating behavior. Chemosens Percept 10(4):104–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stafford LD, Welbeck K (2011) High hunger state increases olfactory sensitivity to neutral but not food odors. Chem Senses. 36:189–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Y. Zang
    • 1
    • 4
  • P. Han
    • 2
  • S. Burghardt
    • 1
  • A. Knaapila
    • 3
  • V. Schriever
    • 1
  • T. Hummel
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Interdisciplinary Center Smell and Taste, Department of OtorhinolaryngologyMedical Faculty Carl Gustav CarusDresdenGermany
  2. 2.Faculty of PsychologySouthwest UniversityChongqingChina
  3. 3.Department of Pedriatric MedicineFaculty of Agriculture and Forestry Common MattersHelsinkiFinland
  4. 4.Department of OtorhinolaryngologyThe Affiliated Hospital XUZHOU Medical UniversityXuzhouChina

Personalised recommendations