Skip to main content
Log in

Risk factors for intraoperative saddle nose deformity in septoplasty patients

  • Rhinology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Septoplasty is one of the most common otolaryngologic procedures. Previous studies have reported that the overall rate of significant change in cosmetic appearance of the nose after septoplasty ranged from 0.4 to 3.4%, and saddle nose was the most commonly cited deformity. In this study, we evaluated the risk factors for intraoperative saddle nose in a group of septoplasty patients.

Methods

This case–control study (1:2 case:control) was conducted based on retrospective chart review. Intraoperative saddle nose was observed in 108 (5.1%) of 2106 patients who underwent septoplasty in our center between January 2008 and December 2017. The control group consisted of 216 randomly selected, hospital-matched septoplasty patients who had no intraoperative saddle nose deformity in the same period. The demographic data, preoperative endoscopic findings, and surgical procedures of the two groups were analyzed to identify possible risk factors of intraoperative saddle nose deformity.

Results

The mean ages of the two groups were 34.8 years (saddle group) and 33.2 years (control group). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, clinical risk factors associated with intraoperative saddle nose were female gender (OR 3.39; 95% CI 1.76–6.54; p < 0.01), severe caudal septal deviation (OR 2.22; 95% CI 1.30–3.79; p = 0.003), and intraoperative finding of septal cartilage fracture (OR 3.96; 95% CI 1.92–8.19; p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Severe caudal septal deviation, intraoperative fracture of septal cartilage, and female gender were risk factors for intraoperative saddle nose deformity in our study population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dorning H, Bitzer EM, Hofmann W, Schwartz FW (1995) Longitudinal analysis of utilization of inpatient treatment based on insurance data of mandatory health insurance. Gesundheitswesen 57:631–637

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Manoukian PD, Wyatt JR, Leopold DA, Bass EB (1997) Recent trends in utilization of procedures in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery. Laryngoscope 107:472–477

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Laguna D, Lopez-Cortijo C, Millan I, Gonzalez FM, Garcia-Berrocal JR (2008) Blood loss in endoscopic sinus surgery: assessment of variables. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 37:324–330

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yanagisawa E, Ho SY (1998) Unintended middle turbinectomy during septoplasty. Ear Nose Throat J 77:368–369

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Onerci TM, Ayhan K, Ogretmenoglu O (2004) Two consecutive cases of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea after septoplasty operation. Am J Otolaryngol 25:354–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yeo NK, Jang YJ (2009) Rhinoplasty to correct nasal deformities in postseptoplasty patients. Am J Rhinol Allergy 23:540–545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ketcham AS, Han JK (2010) Complications and management of septoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 43:897–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Karacaoglan N, Uysal OA (1998) Use of iliac bone graft for saddle nose deformity. Auris Nasus Larynx 25:49–57

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gillman GS, Egloff AM, Rivera-Serrano CM (2014) Revision septoplasty: a prospective disease-specific outcome study. Laryngoscope 124:1290–1295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kang JM, Nam ME, Dhong HJ, Kim HY, Chung SK, Kim JH (2012) Modified mattress suturing technique for correcting the septal high dorsal deviation around the keystone area. Am J Rhinol Allergy 26:227–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kawalski H, Spiewak P (1998) How septum deformations in newborns occur. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 44:23–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mladina R, Čujić E, Šubarić M, Vuković K (2008) Nasal septal deformities in ear, nose, and throat patients: an international study. Am J Otolaryngol 29:75–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gubisch W (2005) Extracorporeal septoplasty for the markedly deviated septum. Arch Facial Plast Surg 7:218–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Muhammad IA, Nabil-ur R (2003) Complications of the surgery for deviated nasal septum. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 13:565–568

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rettinger G, Kirsche H (2006) Complications in septoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 22:289–297

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bateman ND, Woolford TJ (2003) Informed consent for septal surgery: the evidence-base. J Laryngol Otol 117:186–189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MEST) (2017R1A2B4006453).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyo Yeol Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee at the Samsung Medical Center (IRB number: SMC 2018-05-136).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, J.J., Hong, S.D., Dhong, HJ. et al. Risk factors for intraoperative saddle nose deformity in septoplasty patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 276, 1981–1986 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05411-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05411-x

Keywords

Navigation