Advertisement

Endoscopic anatomical study of the trans-lateral molar approach to the infratemporal fossa

  • Wei-wei Cai
  • Yan Zou
  • Zhuang Kang
  • Jian-gang Liang
  • Hai-yong HeEmail author
  • Qin-tai YangEmail author
Head & Neck
  • 43 Downloads

Abstract

Background

The infratemporal fossa (ITF) is located deep in the skull base. Recently, the endoscopic transoral approach has enabled maxillofacial surgeons to access the ITF using a less invasive approach compared to the traditional transfacial and endonasal endoscopic approaches.

Objective

The present study aims to provide maxillofacial surgeons with new data concerning direct endoscopic measurement and precise anatomical topography features of the endoscopic trans-lateral molar approach to ITF by comparing the endoscopic and regional anatomy of ITF. A clinical case receiving the proposed surgical approach is used to determine the feasibility of this technique.

Method

The anatomical data were obtained by measuring the bone anatomical landmarks and analyzing the CT imaging data using GE’s Advance Windows 4.1 software on 25 subjects (50 sides). Morphological pictures of the regional anatomy and endoscopic anatomy were obtained from 6 (12 sides) adult cadaver heads, and the anatomical features were described. The present study reports the management of one case using the proposed surgical approach.

Results

The proposed surgical approach clearly revealed neurovascular, muscular, and surgical landmarks in the ITF. The surgical case supports the minimally invasive treatment approach, which could rapidly access the ITF and completely excise benign tumors.

Conclusion

The anatomical studies and surgical case presentation helps us understand the spatial relationship of surgical landmarks of the surgical approach to the ITF for the treatment of benign lesions in the deep cranial base area.

Keywords

Endoscope Regional anatomy Surgical approach Lateral molar Pterygopalatine fossa Infratemporal fossa 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Data collection was conducted in The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University. The dissection of cadaver heads was performed in the Anatomic Lab of The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University. Other works including CT image processing, anatomic measurement, and article writing were conducted in Panyu Central Hospital.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Isolan GR, Rowe R, Al-Mefty O (2007) Microanatomy and surgical approaches to the infratemporal fossa: an anaglyphic three-dimensional stereoscopic printing study. Skull Base 17:285–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hitotsumatsu T, Rhoton AL Jr (2000) Unilateral upper and lower subtotal maxillectomy approaches to the cranial base: microsurgical anatomy. Neurosurgery 46:1416–1452 (discussion 1452–1413) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kuet ML, Kasbekar AV, Masterson L, Jani P (2015) Management of tumors arising from the parapharyngeal space: a systematic review of 1,293 cases reported over 25 years. Laryngoscope 125:1372–1381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Riffat F, Dwivedi RC, Palme C, Fish B, Jani P (2014) A systematic review of 1143 parapharyngeal space tumors reported over 20 years. Oral Oncol 50:421–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dallan I, Fiacchini G, Turri-Zanoni M, Seccia V, Battaglia P, Casani AP et al (2016) Endoscopic-assisted transoral-transpharyngeal approach to parapharyngeal space and infratemporal fossa: focus on feasibility and lessons learned. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273:3965–3972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Theodosopoulos PV, Guthikonda B, Brescia A, Keller JT, Zimmer LA (2010) Endoscopic approach to the infratemporal fossa: anatomic study. Neurosurgery 66:196–202 (discussion 202–193) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Alfieri A, Jho HD, Schettino R, Tschabitscher M (2003) Endoscopic endonasal approach to the pterygopalatine fossa: anatomic study. Neurosurgery 52:374–378 (discussion 378–380) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Taylor RJ, Patel MR, Wheless SA, McKinney KA, Stadler ME, Sasaki-Adams D et al (2014) Endoscopic endonasal approaches to infratemporal fossa tumors: a classification system and case series. Laryngoscope 124:2443–2450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fortes FS, Sennes LU, Carrau RL, Brito R, Ribas GC, Yasuda A et al (2008) Endoscopic anatomy of the pterygopalatine fossa and the transpterygoid approach: development of a surgical instruction model. Laryngoscope 118:44–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Van Rompaey J, Suruliraj A, Carrau R, Panizza B, Solares CA (2013) Access to the parapharyngeal space: an anatomical study comparing the endoscopic and open approaches. Laryngoscope 123:2378–2382Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Battaglia P, Turri-Zanoni M, Dallan I, Gallo S, Sica E, Padoan G et al (2014) Endoscopic endonasal transpterygoid transmaxillary approach to the infratemporal and upper parapharyngeal tumors. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 150:696–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lee JT, Suh JD, Carrau RL, Chu MW, Chiu AG (2017) Endoscopic Denker’s approach for resection of lesions involving the anteroinferior maxillary sinus and infratemporal fossa. Laryngoscope 127:556–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chan JY, Li RJ, Lim M, Hinojosa AQ, Boahene KD (2011) Endoscopic transvestibular paramandibular exploration of the infratemporal fossa and parapharyngeal space: a minimally invasive approach to the middle cranial base. Laryngoscope 121:2075–2080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Patwa HS, Yanez-Siller JC, Gomez Galarce M, Otto BA, Prevedello DM, Carrau RL (2018) Analysis of the far-medial transoral endoscopic approach to the infratemporal fossa. Laryngoscope 128:2273–2281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Solari D, Magro F, Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, Samii A, Esposito F et al (2007) Anatomical study of the pterygopalatine fossa using an endoscopic endonasal approach: spatial relations and distances between surgical landmarks. J Neurosurg 106:157–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cai WW, Zhang GH, Yang QT, Wang ZY, Liu X, Ye J et al (2010) Endoscopic endonasal anatomy of pterygopalatine fossa and infratemporal fossa: comparison of endoscopic and radiological landmarks. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi 45:843–848Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gamieldien MY, Van Schoor A (2016) Retromolar foramen: an anatomical study with clinical considerations. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 54:784–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Palti DG, Almeida CM, Rodrigues Ade C, Andreo JC, Lima JE (2011) Anesthetic technique for inferior alveolar nerve block: a new approach. J Appl Oral Sci 19:11–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fortes FS, Pinheiro-Neto CD, Carrau RL, Brito RV, Prevedello DM, Sennes LU (2012) Endonasal endoscopic exposure of the internal carotid artery: an anatomical study. Laryngoscope 122:445–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Muto J, Carrau RL, Oyama K, Otto BA, Prevedello DM (2017) Training model for control of an internal carotid artery injury during transsphenoidal surgery. Laryngoscope 127:38–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck SurgeryPanyu Central HospitalGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated HospitalSun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouChina
  3. 3.Department of Neurosurgery, The Third Affiliated HospitalSun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouChina
  4. 4.Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Third Affiliated HospitalSun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations