A recent clinical trial has shown the feasibility of robotic cochlear implantation. The electrode was inserted through the robotically drilled tunnel and an additional access through the external auditory canal was created to provide for means of visualization and manipulation. To obviate the need for this additional access, the utilization of multiple robotically drilled tunnels targeting the round window has been proposed. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of electrode insertion through a robotic multiport approach.
In four ex vivo human head specimens (left side), four trajectories through the facial recess (2x) and the retrofacial and suprameatal region were planned and robotically drilled. Optimal three-port configurations were determined for each specimen by analyzing combinations of three of the four trajectories, where the three trajectories were used for the electrode, endoscopic visualization and manipulative assistance. Finally, electrode insertions were conducted through the optimal configurations.
The electrodes could successfully be inserted, and the procedure sufficiently visualized through the facial recess drill tunnels in all specimens. Effective manipulative assistance for sealing the round window could be provided through the retrofacial tunnel.
Electrode insertion through a robotic three-port approach is feasible. Drill tunnels through the facial recess for the electrode and endoscope allow for optimized insertion angles and sufficient visualization. Through a retrofacial tunnel effective manipulation for sealing is possible.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Yang G-Z, Cambias J, Cleary K et al (2017) Medical robotics—regulatory, ethical, and legal considerations for increasing levels of autonomy. Sci Robot 2:8638
Weber S, Gavaghan K, Wimmer W et al (2017) Instrument flight to the inner ear. Sci Robot 2:eaal4916. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aal4916
Caversaccio M, Gavaghan K, Wimmer W et al (2017) Robotic cochlear implantation: surgical procedure and first clinical experience. Acta Otolaryngol 137:447–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2017.1278573
Labadie RF, Balachandran R, Noble JH et al (2014) Minimally invasive image-guided cochlear implantation surgery: first report of clinical implementation. Laryngoscope 124:1915–1922. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24520
Stenin I, Hansen S, Becker M et al (2014) Minimally invasive multiport surgery of the lateral skull base. Biomed Res Int 2014:379295. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/379295
Stenin I, Hansen S, Nau-Hermes M et al (2017) Minimally invasive, multi-port approach to the lateral skull base: a first in vitro evaluation. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 12:889–895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-017-1533-5
Klenzner T, Ngan CC, Knapp FB et al (2009) New strategies for high precision surgery of the temporal bone using a robotic approach for cochlear implantation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266:955–960. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-008-0825-3
Bell B, Gerber N, Williamson T et al (2013) In vitro accuracy evaluation of image-guided robot system for direct cochlear access. Otol Neurotol 34:1284–1290. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e31829561b6
Williamson T, Gavaghan K, Gerber N et al (2017) Population statistics approach for safety assessment in robotic cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000001357
Wimmer W, Venail F, Williamson T et al (2014) Semiautomatic cochleostomy target and insertion trajectory planning for minimally invasive cochlear implantation. Biomed Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/596498
Verbist BM, Skinner MW, Cohen LT et al (2010) Consensus panel on a cochlear coordinate system applicable in histologic, physiologic, and radiologic studies of the human cochlea. Otol Neurotol 31:722–730. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181d279e0
Wimmer W, Gavaghan K, Williamson T, Gerber N, Caversaccio M, Weber S (2016) Electrode array insertion for minimally invasive robotic cochlear implantation with a guide tube. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 11:80–81
Williamson T, Gavaghan K, Gerber N et al (2017) Population statistics approach for safety assessment in robotic cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 38:759–764. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000001357
Morrel WG, Jayawardena ADL, Amberg MS et al (2018) Revision surgery following minimally invasive image-guided cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.27636
The authors thank the Institute of Anatomy at the University of Bern for the preparation of the specimens.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research involving human participants and/or animals
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants (ex vivo) were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Schneider, D., Stenin, I., Ansó, J. et al. Robotic cochlear implantation: feasibility of a multiport approach in an ex vivo model. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 276, 1283–1289 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05318-7
- Cochlear implantation
- Robotic surgery
- Multiport surgery
- Electrode insertion