European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

, Volume 275, Issue 11, pp 2695–2703 | Cite as

Surgery for post-traumatic facial paralysis: are we overdoing it?

  • Sanjeev Yadav
  • Naresh Kumar PandaEmail author
  • Roshan Verma
  • Jaimanti Bakshi
  • Manish Modi



Early facial nerve decompression is recommended for cases of post-traumatic facial palsy on the basis of ENoG with degeneration > 95%. There is still a dispute in the literature concerning the role and timing of surgery versus conservative treatment in such cases. This study has been planned to evaluate the outcome of conservative management in traumatic facial paralysis with regard to type of trauma, onset, and electrodiagnostic tests.


A prospective cohort study included 39 patients with post-traumatic facial palsy. All patients underwent ENoG, nerve stimulation test, HRCT temporal bone and Schirmer’s test. The patients received intravenous methylprednisolone 1 gm/day for 5 days or oral prednisolone 1 mg/kg in tapering doses for 3 weeks. Follow-up was done at 4, 12 and 24 weeks after the treatment. Surgical exploration was limited to patients showing no improvement after 12 weeks. Facial nerve function was evaluated by the HBFNS and FEMA grading systems.


Among the 39 patients in the study [5 women and 34 men; mean (SD) age, 33.5 (11.37) years], facial nerve recovery with conservative treatment alone was noted in 31 patients. The first signs of clinical recovery were noted in 27 patients by 4 weeks, in 31 patients by 12 weeks. Seven patients required surgical exploration. At 24 weeks, 31 patients recovered to House–Brackmann grade I/III and 1 patient to grade IV. 19 of 26 patients with longitudinal fractures had grade I/III recovery, whereas all 6 patients with transverse fracture recovered on conservative treatment.


Patients with incomplete facial palsy are candidates for conservative management. It is justified to try conservative management in patients with complete facial paralysis for up to 3 months even in cases where ENoG and NET suggest poor prognosis. The presence of sensorineural hearing loss or transverse fracture at presentation does not suggest a poor prognosis for improvement.


Facial palsy Trauma Grading Electroneuronography 



This research received no specific Grant from any funding agency, commercial or not for profit sectors.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee, and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.


  1. 1.
    Kerr AG, Smyth GD (1987) Ear trauma. Scott-Brown’s Otolaryngology, 5th edn. Butterworths, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jackler RK((1990) Facial, auditory, and vestibular nerve injuries associated with basilar skull fractures. Neurol Surg 3:2305–2316Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brodie HA, Thompson TC (1997) Management of complications from 820 temporal bone fractures. Otol Neurotol 18:188–197Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fisch U (1980) Management of intratemporal facial nerve injuries. JLO 1980 94:129–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ulug T, Ulubil SA (2005) Management of facial paralysis in temporal bone fractures: a prospective study analyzing 11 operated fractures. Am J Otol 26:230–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    House JW, Brackmann DE (1985) Facial nerve grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 93:146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Evans RA, Harries ML, Baguley DM, Moffat DA (1989) Reliability of the House and Brackmann grading system for facial palsy. JLO 103:1045–1046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kim HN, Lee WS, Yoon PM, Lee HK, Kim DY(1998) Clinical application of the FEMA grading system. New horizons in facial nerve research and facial expression. Kugler, The Hague, pp 533–538Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Panda NK, Kaushal D, Verma R (2012) Modified surgical approach in facial palsy: it’s worth a try. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 147:P214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fisch U (1980) Maximal nerve excitability testing vs electroneuronography. Arch Otolaryngol 106:352–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xu P, Jin A, Dai B, Li R, Li Y (2017) Surgical timing for facial paralysis after temporal bone trauma. Am J Otol 38:269–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Darrouzet V, Duclos JY, Liguoro D, Truilhe Y, De Bonfils C, Bebear JP (2001) Management of facial paralysis resulting from temporal bone fractures: our experience in 115 cases. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 125:77–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Turel KE, Sharma NK, Verghese J, Desai S (2005) Post traumatic facial paralysis. Treatment options and strategies. Indian J Neurotrauma 2:33–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chang CJ, Cass SP (1999) Management of facial nerve injury due to temporal bone trauma. Am J Otol 20:96–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fattah AY, Gurusinghe AD, Gavilan J, Hadlock TA, Marcus JR, Marres H et al (2015) Facial nerve grading instruments: systematic review of the literature and suggestion for uniformity. Plast Reconstr Surg 135:569–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thakar A, Gupta MP, Srivastava A, Agrawal D, Kumar A (2018) Nonsurgical treatment for posttraumatic complete facial nerve paralysis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 144:315–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Panda NK, Mehra YN, Mann SB, Mehta SK (1991) Post traumatic facial paralysis—a review. JPMA 41:105–107Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hough JV, David Stuart W (1968) Middle ear injuries in skull trauma. Laryngoscope 78:899–937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brodsky L, Eviatar A, Daniller A (1983) Post-traumatic facial nerve paralysis: three cases of delayed temporal bone exploration with recovery. The Laryngoscope 93:1560–1565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Beck DL, Benecke JE (1993) Electroneurography: electrical evaluation of the facial nerve. J Am Acad Audiol 4:109–115PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Grosheva M, Wittekindt C, Guntinas-Lichius O (2008) Prognostic value of electroneurography and electromyography in facial palsy. Laryngoscope 118:394–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fisch U (1974) Facial paralysis in fractures of the petrous bone. Laryngoscope 84:2141–2154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lambert PR, Brackmann DE (1984) Facial paralysis in longitudinal temporal bone fractures: a review of 26 cases. The Laryngoscope 94:1022–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Coker NJ, Kendall KA, Jenkins HA, Alford BR (1987) Traumatic infratemporal facial nerve injury: management rationale for preservation of function. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 97:262–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zayas JO, Feliciano YZ, Hadley CR, Gomez AA, Vidal JA (2011) Temporal bone trauma and the role of multidetector CT in the emergency department. Radiographics 31:1741–1755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ulug T, Ulubil SA (2005) Management of facial paralysis in temporal bone fractures: a prospective study analyzing 11 operated fractures. Am J Otolaryngol 26:230–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Quaranta CG, Piazza F, Quaranta N, Salonna I (2001) Facial nerve paralysis in temporal bone fractures: outcomes after late decompression surgery. Actaoto-laryngologica 121:652–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Popović D, Stanković M, Popović Z, Milisavljević D (2003) Traumatic facial palsy. Facta Univ Med Bio 1:3Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of OtolaryngologyPGIMERChandigarhIndia
  2. 2.Department of NeurologyPGIMERChandigarhIndia

Personalised recommendations