Cortical processing of speech in individuals with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder
- 154 Downloads
Auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) is a condition where cochlear amplification function (involving outer hair cells) is normal but neural conduction in the auditory pathway is disordered. This study was done to investigate the cortical representation of speech in individuals with ANSD and to compare it with the individuals with normal hearing.
Forty-five participants including 21 individuals with ANSD and 24 individuals with normal hearing were considered for the study. Individuals with ANSD had hearing thresholds ranging from normal hearing to moderate hearing loss. Auditory cortical evoked potentials—through odd ball paradigm—were recorded using 64 electrodes placed on the scalp for /ba/-/da/ stimulus. Onset cortical responses were also recorded in repetitive paradigm using /da/ stimuli. Sensitivity and reaction time required to identify the oddball stimuli were also obtained.
Behavioural results indicated that individuals in ANSD group had significantly lower sensitivity and longer reaction times compared to individuals with normal hearing sensitivity. Reliable P300 could be elicited in both the groups. However, a significant difference in scalp topographies was observed between the two groups in both repetitive and oddball paradigms. Source localization using local auto regressive analyses revealed that activations were more diffuses in individuals with ANSD when compared to individuals with normal hearing sensitivity.
Results indicated that the brain networks and regions activated in individuals with ANSD during detection and discrimination of speech sounds are different from normal hearing individuals. In general, normal hearing individuals showed more focused activations while in individuals with ANSD activations were diffused.
KeywordsP300 Cortical potential Auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder
We sincerely thank Director, All India Institute of Speech and Hearing and Head, Department of Audiology. We like to thank all the participants of this study.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- 4.Zeng F, Oba S, Garde S et al (2001) Psychoacoustic and speech perception in auditory neuropathy. In: Sininger Y, Starr A (eds) Auditory neuropathy: a new perspective on hearing disorder. Singular publishing group, Canada, pp 141–164Google Scholar
- 5.Sininger Y, Oba S (2001) Patients with auditory neuropathy: who are they and what can they hear? In: Sininger Y, Starr A (eds) Auditory neuropathy: a new perspective on hearing disorder. Singular Publishing Group, Montreal, pp 15–36Google Scholar
- 6.Narne VK, Vanaja CS (2008) Speech identification and cortical potentials in individuals with auditory neuropathy. Behav Brain Funct 4(15):2–9Google Scholar
- 11.Narne VK, Prabhu P, Chandan H, Deepthi M (2014) Audiological profiling of 198 individuals with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder. Hear Balanc Commun 12:112–120. http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/21695717.2014.938481. Accessed 13 Jan 2015 (Internet)
- 18.Venkatesan S (2009) Ethical guidelines for bio-behavioral research involving human subjects. All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, MysoreGoogle Scholar
- 31.Polish J (2003) Theoretical overview of P3a and P3b. In: Polish J (eds) Detection of change. Springer, Boston, MA, pp 89–98Google Scholar
- 33.Swick D, Kutas M, Neville H (1994) Localizing the neural generators of event-related brain potentials. Localization Neuroimaging Neuropsychol 73–121Google Scholar
- 34.Johnson R (1993) On the neural generators of the P300 component of the event-related potential. Psychophysiology 30:90–97Google Scholar