Oropharyngeal and tongue exercises (myofunctional therapy) for snoring: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- 917 Downloads
Oropharyngeal and tongue exercises (myofunctional therapy) have been shown to improve obstructive sleep apnea. However, to our knowledge, a systematic review has not been performed for snoring. The study objective is to perform a systematic review, with a meta-analysis, dedicated to snoring outcomes after myofunctional therapy.
PubMed/MEDLINE and three other databases were searched through November 25, 2017. Two authors independently searched the literature. Eligibility (1) patients: children or adults with snoring, (2) intervention: oropharyngeal and/or tongue exercises, (3) comparison: pre and post-treatment data for snoring, (4) outcomes: snoring frequency and snoring intensity, (5) study design: publications of all study designs.
A total of 483 articles were screened, 56 were downloaded in their full text form, and nine studies reported outcomes related to snoring. There were a total of 211 patients (all adults) in these studies. The snoring intensity was reduced by 51% in 80 patients from pre-therapy to post-therapy visual analog scale values of 8.2 ± 2.1 (95% CI 7.7, 8.7) to 4.0 ± 3.7 (95% CI 3.2, 4.8). Berlin questionnaire snoring intensity reduced by 36% in 34 patients from 2.5 ± 1.0 (95% CI 2.2, 2.8) to 1.6 ± 0.8 (95% CI 1.3, 1.9). Finally, time spent snoring during sleep was reduced by 31% in 60 patients from 26.3 ± 18.7% (95% CI 21.6, 31.0) to 18.1 ± 20.5% (95% CI 12.9, 23.3) of total sleep time.
This systematic review demonstrated that myofunctional therapy has reduced snoring in adults based on both subjective questionnaires and objective sleep studies.
KeywordsSnoring Myofunctional therapy Systematic review Meta-analysis
No funding was received for this research.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria, educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge, or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
For this type of study, formal consent is not required. There is no additional need for informed consent as no identifying information is included in this article.
- 5.Certal V, Nishino N, Camacho M, Capasso R (2013) Reviewing the systematic reviews in OSA surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 149 (6):817–829. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599813509959
- 7.Kumar AR, Guilleminault C, Certal V, Li D, Capasso R, Camacho M (2014) Nasopharyngeal airway stenting devices for obstructive sleep apnoea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Laryngol Otol:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022215114003119
- 10.Baz H, Elshafey M, Elmorsy S, Abu-Samra M (2012) The role of oral myofunctional therapy in managing patients with mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea. PAN Arab J Rhinol 2(1):17–22Google Scholar
- 11.Berreto e Silva Pitta D, Farias Pessoa A, Sampaio AL, Nonato Rodrigues R, Guiot Tavares M, Tavares P (2007) Oral myofunctional therapy applied on two cases of severe obstructive sleep apnea. Intl Arch Otorhinolaryngol 11(3):350–354Google Scholar
- 15.Kayamori F (2015) The effects of myofunctional and orofascial therapy in patients with primary snoring and obstructive sleep apnea and anatomy and airway function. Doctoral thesis, Faculdade de Medicina, pp 1–116Google Scholar