Skip to main content
Log in

Prosthetic supply of facial defects: long-term experience and retrospective analysis on 99 patients

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Defects in the head region may be caused by tumour treatments, injuries, as well as congenital malformations. The restoration of these defects that can be performed through reconstructive plastic surgery and/or prosthetic surgery occupies a high priority in the physical and psychological rehabilitation of the patient. The present study reports on long-term experience in supply of facial prosthesis.

Materials and methods

The medical records of 99 patients, who had been supplied with custom-made facial prostheses between 2001 and 2011, were evaluated retrospectively.

Results

There were 59 male (60%) and 40 (40%) female patients. The reason for prosthetic supplement was a tumour disease in 50 patients, congenital malformation in 39 patients, and trauma in 10 patients. Fifty-three patients were treated with ear prosthesis, twenty-seven patients were treated with eye prosthesis, and nineteen patients with nasal prosthesis. 82.8% of prosthetic supplies were designed as magnetic support prostheses. The most common complication was skin redness around the implants. 10% of patients suffered the loss of the osseointegrated implants.

Conclusion

The osseointegrated titanium implants with magnet support provide a reliable attachment for prosthesis and constitute a promising alternative to surgical reconstruction of complex facial defects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  1. Leonardi A, Buonaccorsi S, Pellacchia V, Moricca LM, Indrizzi E, Fini G (2008) Maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation using extraoral implants. J Craniofac Surg 19:398–405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schoen PJ, Raghoebar GM, van Oort RP, Reintsema H, van der Laan BF, Burlage FR, Roodenburg JL, Vissink A (2001) Treatment outcome of bone-anchored craniofacial prostheses after tumor surgery. Cancer 92:3045–3050

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Federspil PA (2009) Implant-retained craniofacial prostheses for facial defects. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 8:Doc03 (Epub 2011 Mar 10)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Alvi R, McPhail J, Hancock K (2002) Closed-field titanium magnets for the retention of complex craniofacial prostheses. Br J Plast Surg 55:668–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Federspil PA (2010) Auricular prostheses. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 68:65–80

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bozzato V, Schneider MH, Al Kadah B, Schick B (2015) Epithetische Versorgung in der HNO-Heilkunde. HNO 63:727–38

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ring ME (1991) The history of maxillofacial prosthetics. Plast Reconstr Surg 87:174–84

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wagenblast J, Baghi M, Helbig M, Arnoldner C, Bisdas S, Gstöttner W, Hambek M, May A (2008) Craniofacial reconstructions with bone-anchored epithesis in head and neck cancer patients—a valid way back to self-perception and social reintegration. Anticancer Res 28:2349–2352

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kang NV, Morritt D, Pendegrass C, Blunn G (2013) Use of ITAP implants for prosthetic reconstruction of extra-oral craniofacial defects. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 66:497–505

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brånemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindström J, Hallen O, Öhman A (1977) Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of edentulous jaw: experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 11:1–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindström J (1981) Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a longlasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 52:155–170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zarb GA, Albrektsson T (1991) Osseointegation—a requiem for the periodontal ligament? Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 11:88–91

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tjellström A, Lindström J, Hallen O, Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI (1981) Osseointegrated titanium implants in the temporal bone. A clinical study on bone-anchored hearing aids. Am J Otol 2:304–310

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tjellström A, Lindström J, Nylen O, Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI, Birgersson B, Nero H, Sylven C (1981) The bone-anchored auricular episthesis. Laryngoscope 91:811–815

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Toljanic JA, Eckert SE, Roumanas E, Beumer J, Huryn JM, Zlotolow IM, Reisberg DJ, Habakuk SW, Wright RF, Rubenstein JE, Schneid TR, Mullasseril P, Garcia LT, Bedard JF, Choi YG (2005) Osseointegrated craniofacial implants in the rehabilitation of orbital defects: an update of a retrospective experience in the United States. J Prosthet Dent 94:177–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vander Poorten V, Meulemans J, Delaere P (2016) Midface prosthetic rehabilitation. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 24:98–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Curi MM, Oliveira MF, Molina G, Cardoso CL, Oliveira Lde G, Branemark PI, Ribeiro Kde C (2012) Extraoral implants in the rehabilitation of craniofacial defects: implant and prosthesis survival rates and peri-implant soft tissue evaluation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70:1551–1557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Holgers KM, Tjellström A, Bjursten LM, Erlandsson BE (1987) Soft tissue reactions around percutaneous implants: a clinical study on skinpenetrating titanium implants used for bone-anchored auricular prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2:35–39

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Younis I, Gault D, Sabbagh W, Kang NV (2010) Patient satisfaction and aesthetic outcomes after ear reconstruction with a Branemark-type, bone-anchored, ear prosthesis: a 16 year review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63:1650–1655

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Deitmer T, Krassort M, Hartmann S (2003) Zwei seltene Komplikationen bei Patienten mit knochenverankerten Hörgeräte. Laryngorhinootologie 82:162–165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the valuable contribution made by native English speaker Victoria Feier in correcting this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Basel Al Kadah.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This study was not funded.

Conflict of interest

Author Papaspyrou Giorgos declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author Yildiz Cansel declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author Bozzato Victoria declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author Bohr Christopher declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author Schneider Mathias declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author Hecker Dietmer declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author Schick Bernhard declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author Al Kadah Basel declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Papaspyrou, G., Yildiz, C., Bozzato, V. et al. Prosthetic supply of facial defects: long-term experience and retrospective analysis on 99 patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 275, 607–613 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4835-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4835-x

Keywords

Navigation