Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Modified single-stage segmental cricotracheal resection

  • Laryngology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of our work is to demonstrate in a large cohort of patients with cricotracheal stenosis that resection of long airway segments could be performed with no increased risk of postoperative complications. A consecutive series of patients getting cervical segmental cricotracheal resection (CTR) were reviewed. The typical segmental tracheal resection technique has been modified to accommodate long segment removal. Modifications include using trachea to enable the reconstruction of the larynx itself as well as the placement of a “laryngosternopexy” stitch between the thyroid lamina and the sternoclavicular ligament designed to take all of the tension off the anastomosis and to prevent inadvertent head extension. Anastomosis was performed by using continuous barbed sutures that allowed gradual approximation of the proximal and distal segments even in the presence of a large segmental airway resection defect that could involve as much as half of the tracheal length. Thirty-eight patients were treated. Primary etiologies of cricotracheal stenosis were prolonged intubation and tracheostomy. All had Grade III–IV stenosis. Only one patient had postoperative revision surgery for anastomosis-based disease. All patients with tracheostomy (n = 29) were successfully decannulated. Complications occurred in five patients. These included acute airway obstruction requiring emergency tracheostomy through the anastomosis, a tracheal dehiscence, laryngeal edema with airway obstruction, superficial wound infections, neck abscesses, and transient vocal cord immobility. Modified cricotracheal resection has comparable results to traditional techniques and may offer advantages such as resection of long tracheal segments without any increase in the risk of post-anastomosis airway leak.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grillo HC (1982) Primary reconstruction of airway after resection of subglottic laryngeal and upper tracheal stenosis. Ann Thorac Surg 33(1):3–18

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gould SJ, Young M (1992) Subglottic ulceration and healing following endotracheal intubation in the neonate: a morphometric study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 101(10):815–820

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mansour KA, Lee RB, Miller JI Jr (1994) Tracheal resections: lessons learned. Ann Thorac Surg 57(5):1120–1124 (discussion 1124–1125)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Grillo HC (2003) The history of tracheal surgery. Chest Surg Clin N Am 13(2):175–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mutrie CJ, Eldaif SM, Rutledge CW, Force SD, Grist WJ, Mansour KA, Miller DL (2011) Cervical tracheal resection: new lessons learned. Ann Thorac Surg 91(4):1101–1106. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.11.066 (discussion 1106)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Macchiarini P, Verhoye JP, Chapelier A, Fadel E, Dartevelle P (2001) Partial cricoidectomy with primary thyrotracheal anastomosis for postintubation subglottic stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 121(1):68–76. doi:10.1067/mtc.2001.111420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Amoros JM, Ramos R, Villalonga R, Morera R, Ferrer G, Diaz P (2006) Tracheal and cricotracheal resection for laryngotracheal stenosis: experience in 54 consecutive cases. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 29(1):35–39. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.10.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Myer CM 3rd, O’Connor DM, Cotton RT (1994) Proposed grading system for subglottic stenosis based on endotracheal tube sizes. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 103(4 Pt 1):319–323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lano CF Jr, Duncavage JA, Reinisch L, Ossoff RH, Courey MS, Netterville JL (1998) Laryngotracheal reconstruction in the adult: a ten year experience. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 107(2):92–97. doi:10.1177/000348949810700202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Atallah I, Manjunath MK, Omari AA, Righini CA, Castellanos PF (2017) Reconstructive transoral laser microsurgery for posterior glottic web with stenosis. Laryngoscope 127(3):685–690. doi:10.1002/lary.26212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. El-Fattah AM, Kamal E, Amer HE, Fouda M, Elwahab AE, Tawfik A (2011) Cervical tracheal resection with cricotracheal anastomosis: experience in adults with grade III–IV tracheal stenosis. J Laryngol Otol 125(6):614–619. doi:10.1017/S0022215110002537

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Piazza C, Del Bon F, Paderno A, Grazioli P, Mangili S, Lombardi D, Nicolai P, Peretti G (2014) Complications after tracheal and cricotracheal resection and anastomosis for inflammatory and neoplastic stenoses. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 123(11):798–804. doi:10.1177/0003489414538764

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yamamoto K, Jaquet Y, Ikonomidis C, Monnier P (2015) Partial cricotracheal resection for paediatric subglottic stenosis: update of the Lausanne experience with 129 cases. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 47(5):876–882. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezu273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. White DR, Cotton RT, Bean JA, Rutter MJ (2005) Pediatric cricotracheal resection: surgical outcomes and risk factor analysis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131(10):896–899. doi:10.1001/archotol.131.10.896

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Auchincloss HG, Wright CD (2016) Complications after tracheal resection and reconstruction: prevention and treatment. J Thorac Dis 8(Suppl 2):S160–S167. doi:10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2016.01.86

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Wright CD, Grillo HC, Wain JC, Wong DR, Donahue DM, Gaissert HA, Mathisen DJ (2004) Anastomotic complications after tracheal resection: prognostic factors and management. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 128(5):731–739. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.07.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bush CM, Prosser JD, Morrison MP, Sandhu G, Wenger KH, Pashley DH, Birchall MA, Postma GN, Weinberger PM (2012) New technology applications: knotless barbed suture for tracheal resection anastomosis. Laryngoscope 122(5):1062–1066. doi:10.1002/lary.23229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Grillo HC (1969) The management of tracheal stenosis following assisted respiration. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 57(1):52–71

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Grillo HC (1972) Tracheal reconstruction. Indications and techniques. Arch Otolaryngol 96(1):31–39

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Grillo HC (1973) Reconstruction of the trachea. Experience in 100 consecutive cases. Thorax 28(6):667–679

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Grillo HC, Bendixen HH, Gephart T (1963) Resection of the carina and lower trachea. Ann Surg 158:889–893

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul F. Castellanos.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all patients included in this study.

Funding

No source of funding.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Atallah, I., Aldkhyyal, A. & Castellanos, P.F. Modified single-stage segmental cricotracheal resection. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 275, 139–146 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4753-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4753-y

Keywords

Navigation