Skip to main content
Log in

Stentless endoscopic repair of congenital choanal atresia: is it enough for maintaining choanal patency?

  • Rhinology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of choanal atresia (CA) surgery is to achieve bilateral nasal patency. Among the different methods of CA repair, the endoscopic transnasal approach has gained recent popularity with the advent of endoscopic instruments and techniques. This article describes our experience regarding CA repair that was done either using or not using a stent in different periods of time in our department. Between February 2006 and February 2016, a total of 29 patients aged 2 days–53 years underwent endoscopic transnasal CA repair. While in early years stents were used to maintain nasal patency, since 2010, all cases were repaired endoscopically without stenting. Of the 29 patients, 8 were excluded because of inadequate follow-up data. The mean follow-up time for the remaining 21 patients after surgery averaged 53 months (range 12–111 months). Intranasal stents were used in 5 of 21 patients for 8 out of 32 operative sides. Of the 8 stented neochoanae, 6 (75%), restenosed at a mean time of 15.2 weeks (5–24). The restenosis rate was 25% (6/24 nasal sides) in 16 patients who underwent stentless repair. In unilateral CA, 2 of 10 (20%) patients underwent atresia repair using stents and only these cases restenosed after surgery in this group. Of the 11 patients with bilateral disease, 5 (45.4%) underwent revision surgeries. In the bilateral group, 2 of 3 (66.6%) stented patients required revision surgeries, whereas 3 of 8 (37.5%) patients who underwent stentless repair relapsed. In one patient, we have experienced an alar cartilage injury intraoperatively caused by drilling. The transnasal endoscopic repair has proved to be effective and yielded long-term satisfactory results. The use of stent seems to have no advantage over a stentless repair regarding maintenance of a patent nasal airway. Patients experienced restenosis more frequently with stenting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Strychowsky JE, Kawai K, Moritz E, Rahbar R, Adil EA (2016) To stent or not to stent? A meta-analysis of endonasal congenital bilateral choanal atresia repair. Laryngoscope 126(1):218–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tatar EC, Ozdek A (2013) Transnasal endoscopic choanal atresia surgery. Turkiye Klinikleri J ENT-Spec Top 6:102–106

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wormald PJ, Zhao YC, Valdes CJ et al (2016) The endoscopic transseptal approach for choanal atresia repair. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 6:654–660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ramsden JD, Campisi P, Forte V (2009) Choanal atresia and choanal stenosis. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 42:339–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Verma RK, Lokesh P, Panda NK (2016) Congenital bilateral adult choanal atresia undiagnosed until the second decade: how we did it. Allergy Rhinol (Providence) 7:82–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tatar EÇ, Ozdek A, Akcan F, Korkmaz H (2012) Bilateral congenital choanal atresia encountered in late adulthood. J Laryngol Otol 126:949–951

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Newman JR, Harmon P, Shirley WP et al (2013) Operative management of choanal atresia: a 15-year experience. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 139:71–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Teissier N, Kaguelidou F, Couloigner V et al (2008) Predictive factors for success after transnasal endoscopic treatment of choanal atresia. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 134:57–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Carter JM, Lawlor C, Guarisco JL (2014) The efficacy of mitomycin and stenting in choanal atresia repair: a 20 year experience. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 78:307–311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schoem SR (2004) Transnasal endoscopic repair of choanal atresia: why stent? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131:362–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ibrahim AA, Magdy EA, Hassab MH (2010) Endoscopic choanoplasty without stenting for congenital choanal atresia repair. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 74:144–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Saafan ME (2013) Endoscopic management of congenital bilateral posterior choanal atresia: value of using stents. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270:129–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Durmaz A, Tosun F, Yildrim N et al (2008) Transnasal endoscopic repair of choanal atresia: results of 13 cases and meta-analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 19:1270–1274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kwong KM (2015) Current updates on choanal atresia. Front Pediatr 3:52

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Stankiewicz JA (1990) The endoscopic repair of choanal atresia. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 103:931–937

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. El-Ahl MA, El-Anwar MW (2012) Stentless endoscopic transnasal repair of bilateral choanal atresia starting with resection of vomer. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 76:1002–1006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kinis V, Ozbay M, Akdag M et al (2014) Patients with congenital choanal atresia treated by transnasal endoscopic surgery. J Craniofac Surg 25:892–897

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. El-Anwar MW, Nofal AA, El-Ahl MA (2016) Endoscopic repair of bilateral choanal atresia, starting with vomer resection: evaluation study. Am J Rhinol Allergy 30:95–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Eladl HM, Khafagy YW (2016) Endoscopic bilateral congenital choanal atresia repair of 112 cases, evolving concept and technical experience. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 85:40–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim H, Park JH, Chung H (2012) Clinical features and surgical outcomes of congenital choanal atresia: factors influencing success from 20-year review in an institute. Am J Otolaryngol 33:308–312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Samadi DS, Shah UK, Handler SD (2003) Choanal atresia: a twenty-year review of medical comorbidities and surgical outcomes. Laryngoscope 113:254–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bülent Öcal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Emel Çadallı Tatar declares that she has no conflict of interest. Bülent Öcal declares that he has no conflict of interest. Esra Doğan declares that she has no conflict of interest. Ömer Bayır declares that he has no conflict of interest. Cem Saka declares that he has no conflict of interest. Ali Özdek declares that he has no conflict of interest. Mehmet Hakan Korkmaz declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Statement of human rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tatar, E.Ç., Öcal, B., Doğan, E. et al. Stentless endoscopic repair of congenital choanal atresia: is it enough for maintaining choanal patency?. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274, 3673–3678 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4702-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4702-9

Keywords

Navigation