Skip to main content
Log in

Water penetration of grommets: an in vitro study

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The insertion of grommets has been one of the most common procedures carried out by ENT surgeons for patients with persistent middle ear fluid. There has always been apprehension at the use of grommets by patients undertaking swimming or other water sports due to concerns of grommet penetration by water into the middle ear. Despite this, no common consensus exists amongst otolaryngologists regarding post-operative advice following grommet insertion. Most studies focus on surface swimming and do not consider other activities such as diving that patients may undertake. This study aimed to determine the hydrostatic head required for water to pass through a grommet using different water-based solutions. These were selected to simulate conditions such as swimming and showering or bathing. An improved model of a grommeted middle ear (based on previous work by Ricks et al.) was constructed using two 5-ml plastic syringes, latex (from a surgical glove), two rubber neoprene membranes and a Shah Ventilation Tube (1.14 mm). Different water solutions were added to the system and the hydrostatic head measured using digital calipers. The results revealed that the hydrostatic head required to penetrate a grommet is lowest using soapy water and highest with distilled water. The differences between chlorinated water and 3% saline were not significant. We hope that this study can be used in conjunction with previous work to better prepare the ENT surgeon in giving suitable post-operative advice following grommet insertion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Armstrong BW (1954) A new treatment for chronic secretory otitis media. AMA Arch Otolaryngol 59(6):653–654

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rosenfeld RM, Schwartz SR, Pynnonen MA, Tunkel DE, Hussey HM, Fichera JS et al (2013) Clinical practice guideline: tympanostomy tubes in children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 149(1 Suppl):S1–S35

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Basu S, Georgalas C, Sen P, Bhattacharyya AK (2007) Water precautions and ear surgery: evidence and practice in the UK. J Laryngol Otol 121(1):9–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Carbonell R, Ruiz-Garcia V (2002) Ventilation tubes after surgery for otitis media with effusion or acute otitis media and swimming. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 66(3):281–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Moualed D, Masterson L, Kumar S, Donnelly N (2016) Water precautions for prevention of infection in children with ventilation tubes (grommets). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 27(1):CD010375

    Google Scholar 

  6. Marks NJ, Mills RP (1983) Swimming and grommets. J R Soc Med 76(1):23–26

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Pashley NR, Scholl PD (1984) Tympanostomy tubes and liquids—an in vitro study. J Otolaryngol 13(5):296–298

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ricks RG, Easto R, Reddy VM (2016) The water penetration of different ventilation tubes. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273(10):3131–3134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hebert RL 2nd, Vick ML, King GE, Bent JP 3rd (2000) Tympanostomy tubes and otic suspensions: do they reach the middle ear space? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 122(3):330–333

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Smith LP, Smullen JL, Younis RT (2005) Differential penetration of ototopicals and water through tympanostomy tubes. Laryngoscope 115(8):1367–1370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hebert RL, King GE, Bent JP (1998) Tympanostomy tubes and water exposure: a practical model. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 124(10):118–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yousef Ibrahim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Yousef Ibrahim declares that he has no conflict of interest. Paul Fram declares that he has no conflict of interest. Gavin Hughes declares that he has no conflict of interest. Pete Phillips declares that he has no conflict of interest. David Owens declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Not applicable.

Funding

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ibrahim, Y., Fram, P., Hughes, G. et al. Water penetration of grommets: an in vitro study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274, 3613–3617 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4700-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4700-y

Keywords

Navigation