Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The impact of cumulative dose of cisplatin on outcome of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the wide use of cisplatin-based concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), data on the optimal regimen and cumulative dose are scarce and frequently conflicting. We aimed to evaluate the compliance and the impact of the cumulative dose of cisplatin on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), loco-regional control (LRC), and distant-metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in a retrospective study. Between 2008 and 2015, 279 patients with HNSCC scheduled for CCRT (three courses of 3-week 100 mg/m2 cisplatin) were identified. Of the whole group, 14% did not receive any cisplatin and 26% received daily cisplatin. In patients planned for three courses (n = 167), 56% received 3, 20% received 2, and 24% received one course. After median follow-up of 31.6 months, the actuarial OS, DFS, LRC, and DMFS rates at 3 years for patients received cumulative dose of ≥200 mg/m2 were significantly better compared to those received <200 mg/m2; 74 vs. 51% for OS, 73 vs. 49% for DFS, 80 vs. 58% for LRC (p < 0.001), and 85 vs. 76% for DMFS (p = 0.034). At multivariate analysis, the cumulative cisplatin dose (≥200 vs. <200 mg/m2) was significantly predictive for OS (HR 2.05; 95% CI 1.35–3.13, p = <0.001). Borderline GFR (60–70 mL/min) at baseline predicts compliance for ≥two courses (p = 0.003). In conclusion, considerable proportion of patients did not receive all pre-planned courses of cisplatin. Patients receiving cumulative cisplatin dose ≥200 mg/m2 had significantly better outcome than those receiving <200 mg/m2 and cumulative dose <200 mg/m2 might even be detrimental. These findings increased the bulk of slowly growing evidence on the optimal cumulative dose of cisplatin. Baseline GFR might predict compliance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parkin DM, Ferlay J, Curado MP, Bray F, Edwards B, Shin HR, et al (2014) Cancer incidence in five continents volume I to X. IARC Cancer Base No. 12. IARC Press (http://gco.iarc.fr). Also at http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/oralcav.html. Accessed 1 Feb 2017

  2. Pignon JP, Le Maitre A, Maillard E, Bourhis J (2009) Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): an update on 93 randomised trials and 17,346 patients. Radiother Oncol 92:4–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoek J, Bloemendal KM, van der Velden LA, van Diessen JN, van Werkhoven E, Klop WM et al (2016) Nephrotoxicity as a dose-limiting factor in a high-dose cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy regimen for head and neck carcinomas. Cancers (Basel) 8:21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Strojan P, Vermorken JB, Beitler JJ, Saba NF, Haigentz M Jr, Bossi P et al (2016) Cumulative cisplatin dose in concurrent chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer: a systematic review. Head Neck 38:2151–2158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ang KK, Harris J, Wheeler R, Weber R, Rosenthal DI, Nguyen-Tân PF et al (2010) Human papillomavirus and survival of patients with oropharyngeal cancer. N Engl J Med 363:24–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Quon H, Leong T, Haselow R, Leipzig B, Cooper J, Forastiere A (2011) Phase III study of radiation therapy with or without cis-platinum in patients with unresectable squamous or undifferentiated carcinoma of the head and neck: an intergroup trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (E2382). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 81:719–725

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Huguenin P, Beer KT, Allal A, Rufibach K, Friedli C, Davis JB et al (2004) Concomitant cisplatin significantly improves loco-regional control in advanced head and neck cancers treated with hyperfactionated radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol 22:4665–4673

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ghi MG, Paccagnella A, Floriani I, Garavaglia D (2011) Concomitant chemoradiation in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a literature-based meta-analysis on the platinum concomitant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 29(suppl):5534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Prado CM, Lieffers JR, McCargar LJ, Reiman T, Sawyer MB, Martin L et al (2008) Prevalence and clinical implications of sarcopenic obesity in patients with solid tumours of the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 9:629–635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Prado CM, Baracos VE, McCargar LJ, Reiman T, Mourtzakis M, Tonkin K et al (2009) Sarcopenia as a determinant of chemotherapy toxicity and time to tumor progression in metastatic breast cancer patients receiving capecitabine treatment. Clin Cancer Res 15:2920–2926

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Espeli V, Zucca E, Ghielmini M, Giannini O, Salatino A, Martucci F et al (2012) Weekly and 3-weekly cisplatin concurrent with intensity-modulated radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer. Oral Oncol 48:266–271

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Geeta SN, Padmanabhan TK, Samuel J, Pavithran K, Iyer S, Kuriakose MA (2006) Comparison of acute toxicities of two chemotherapy schedules for head and neck cancers. J Cancer Res Ther 2:100e4

    Google Scholar 

  13. Uygun K, Bilici A, Karagol H, Caloglu M, Cicin I, Aksu G et al (2009) The comparison of weekly and three weekly cisplatin chemotherapy concurrent with radiotherapy in patients with previously untreated inoperable non-metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 64:601–605

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tsan DL, Lin CY, Kang CJ, Huang SF, Fan KH, Liao CT et al (2012) The comparison between weekly and three-weekly cisplatin delivered concurrently with radiotherapy for patients with postoperative high-risk squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Radiat Oncol 7:215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Rades D, Kronemann S, Meyners T, Bohlen G, Tribius S, Kazic N et al (2011) Comparison of four cisplatin-based radiochemotherapy regimens for nonmetastatic stage III/IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 80:1037–1044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bonner JA, Harari PM, Giralt J, Cohen RB, Jones CU, Sur RK et al (2010) Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer: 5-year survival data from a phase 3 randomised trial, and relation between cetuximab-induced rash and survival. Lancet Oncol 11:21–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Magrini SM, Buglione M, Corvò R, Pirtoli L, Paiar F, Ponticelli P et al (2016) Cetuximab and radiotherapy versus cisplatin and radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer: a randomized phase II trial. J Clin Oncol 34:427–435

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ang KK, Zhang Q, Rosenthal DI, Nguyen-Tan PF, Sherman EJ, Weber RS et al (2014) Randomized phase III trial of concurrent accelerated radiation plus cisplatin with or without cetuximab for stage III to IV head and neck carcinoma: RTOG 0522. J Clin Oncol 32:2940–2950

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Verhagen CV, de Haan R, Hageman F, Oostendorp TP, Carli AL, O’Connor MJ et al (2015) Extent of radiosensitization by the PARP inhibitor olaparib depends on its dose, the radiation dose and the integrity of the homologous recombination pathway of tumor cells. Radiother Oncol J Eur Soc Ther Radiol Oncol 116:358–365

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Harrington K, Berrier A, Robinson M, Remenar E, Housset M, de Mendoza FH et al (2013) Randomised Phase II study of oral lapatinib combined with chemoradiotherapy in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: rationale for future randomized trials in human papilloma virus-negative disease. Eur J Cancer 49:1609–1618

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ferris RL, Blumenschein G Jr, Fayette J, Guigay J, Colevas AD, Licitra L et al (2016) Nivolumab for recurrent squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med 375:1856–1867

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Al-Mamgani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding

None of the authors have received any funding.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any experimental study with human participants performed by any of the authors. For this type of work, formal consent is not required due to its retrospective nature.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Mamgani, A., de Ridder, M., Navran, A. et al. The impact of cumulative dose of cisplatin on outcome of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274, 3757–3765 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4687-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4687-4

Keywords

Navigation