Skip to main content
Log in

Multifactorial assessment is essential to maximize the likelihood of good outcomes after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Letter to the Editor to this article was published on 21 August 2017

The Original Article was published on 20 March 2017

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Nomura K, Arakawa K, Sugawara M, Hidaka H, Suzuki J, Katori Y (2017) Factors influencing endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy outcome. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274:2773–2777

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Liang J, Hur K, Merbs SL, Lane AP (2014) Surgical and anatomic considerations in endoscopic revision of failed external dacryocystorhinostomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 150:901–905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Prakash MD, Viswanatha B, Rasika R (2015) Powered endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with mucosal flaps and trimming of anterior end of middle turbinate. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 67:333–337

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Onerci M, Orhan M, Ogretmenoğlu O, Irkeç M (2000) Long-term results and reasons for failure of intranasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Acta Otolaryngol 120:319–322

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Smirnov G, Tuomilehto H, Teräsvirta M, Nuutinen J, Seppä J (2008) Silicone tubing is not necessary after primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a prospective randomized study. Am J Rhinol 22:214–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chisty N, Singh M, Ali MJ, Naik MN (2016) Long-term outcomes of powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in acute dacryocystitis. Laryngoscope 126:551–553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ali MJ, Psaltis AJ, Murphy J, Wormald PJ (2015) Powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a decade of experience. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 31:219–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sweeney AR, Davis GE, Chang SH, Amadi AJ (2016) Outcomes of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in secondary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction: a case–control study. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. doi:10.1097/IOP.0000000000000841

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yung MW, Hardman-Lea S (2002) Analysis of the results of surgical endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: effect of the level of obstruction. Br J Ophthalmol 86:792–794

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Park J, Kim H (2016) Office-based endoscopic revision using a microdebrider for failed endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273:4329–4334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shin HJ, Woo KI, Kim YD (2017) Factors associated with rhinostomy shape after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Clin Otolaryngol 42:550–556

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee JY, Lee SH, Hong HS, Lee JD, Cho SH (2008) Is the canine fossa puncture approach really necessary for the severely diseased maxillary sinus during endoscopic sinus surgery? Laryngoscope 118:1082–1087

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Myller J, Toppila-Salmi S, Torkkeli T, Heikkinen J, Rautiainen M (2006) Effect of endoscopic sinus surgery on antral mucociliary clearance. Rhinology 44:193–196

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhengcai Lou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Zhengcai Lou declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lou, Z. Multifactorial assessment is essential to maximize the likelihood of good outcomes after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274, 4261–4262 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4685-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4685-6

Navigation