Skip to main content
Log in

The impact on post-operative shoulder function of intraoperative nerve monitoring of cranial nerve XI during modified radical neck dissection

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Intraoperative monitoring of the cranial nerve XI (CN XI) may decrease shoulder disability following modified radical neck dissection. Prospective study was designed comparing results of Constant Shoulder Score (CSS), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and EMG score of the trapezius muscle (mT) before and after surgery. One side of the neck was monitored during surgery with intraoperative nerve monitor. EMG scores of the mT 6 months postoperatively were statistically better on monitored as compared to the non-monitored side of the neck (p = 0.041), while the differences of the CSS and SPADI were not statistically significant. Patients with better EMG scores of the mT at 6 weeks recuperated better and with smaller decrease of the CSS. Intraoperative monitoring is beneficial at the beginning of the surgeon’s learning curve and in the process of familiarizing with anatomical variation of the CN XI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahlberg A, Nikolaidis P, Engstrom T et al (2012) Morbidity of supraomohyoidal and modified radical neck dissection combined with radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: a prospective longitudinal study. Head Neck 34:66–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chepeha DB, Taylor RJ, Chepeha JC et al (2002) Functional assessment using Constant’s Shoulder Scale after modified radical and selective neck dissection. Head Neck 24:432–436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. El Ghani F, Van Den Brekel MW, De Goede CJ, Kuik J, Leemans CR, Smeele LE (2002) Shoulder function and patient well-being after various types of neck dissections. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 27:403–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Erisen L, Basel B, Irdesel J et al (2004) Shoulder function after accessory nerve-sparing neck dissections. Head Neck 26:967–971

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. van Wilgen CP, Dijkstra PU, van der Laan BF, Plukker JT, Roodenburg JL (2003) Shoulder complaints after neck dissection; is the spinal accessory nerve involved? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41:7–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cappiello J, Piazza C, Giudice M, De Maria G, Nicolai P (2005) Shoulder disability after different selective neck dissections (levels II–IV versus levels II–V): a comparative study. Laryngoscope 115:259–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tsuji T, Tanuma A, Onitsuka T et al (2007) Electromyographic findings after different selective neck dissections. Laryngoscope 117:319–322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res (214):160–164

  9. Constant CR, Gerber C, Emery RJ, Sojbjerg JO, Gohlke F, Boileau P (2008) A review of the Constant score: modifications and guidelines for its use. J Shoulder Elb Surg 17:355–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jamnik H, Spevak MK (2008) Shoulder Pain and Disability Index: validation of Slovene version. Int J Rehabil Res 31:337–341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lanisnik B, Zargi M, Rodi Z (2014) Identification of three anatomical patterns of the spinal accessory nerve in the neck by neurophysiological mapping. Radiol Oncol 48:387–392

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Murer K, Huber GF, Haile SR, Stoeckli SJ (2011) Comparison of morbidity between sentinel node biopsy and elective neck dissection for treatment of the n0 neck in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 33:1260–1264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. van Wilgen CP, Dijkstra PU, van der Laan BF, Plukker JT, Roodenburg JL (2004) Shoulder complaints after nerve sparing neck dissections. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 33:253–257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Coskun HH, Erisen L, Basut O (2004) Selective neck dissection for clinically N0 neck in laryngeal cancer: is dissection of level IIb necessary? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131:655–659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Giordano L, Sarandria D, Fabiano B, Del Carro U, Bussi M (2012) Shoulder function after selective and superselective neck dissections: clinical and functional outcomes. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 32:376–379

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Medina JE, Byers RM (1989) Supraomohyoid neck dissection: rationale, indications, and surgical technique. Head Neck 11:111–122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Parikh S, Tedman BM, Scott B, Lowe D, Rogers SN (2012) A double blind randomised trial of IIb or not IIb neck dissections on electromyography, clinical examination, and questionnaire-based outcomes: a feasibility study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50:394–403

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lanisnik B, Zargi M, Rodi Z (2016) Electrophysiologic analysis of injury to cranial nerve XI during neck dissection. Head Neck 38(Suppl 1):E372–E376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Boštjan Lanišnik.

Ethics declarations

Bostjan Lanisnik, MD, PhD, Primoz Levart, MD, Lidija Zitnk, MD, Miha Zargi, MD, PhD and Zoran Rodi, MD, PhD declare they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lanišnik, B., Žitnik, L., Levart, P. et al. The impact on post-operative shoulder function of intraoperative nerve monitoring of cranial nerve XI during modified radical neck dissection. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273, 4445–4451 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4096-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4096-0

Keywords

Navigation