Skip to main content
Log in

Supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF): a rising opportunity for head and neck reconstruction

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the last 20 years, free flaps have represented the gold standard for moderate to large head and neck reconstruction. However, regional flaps continue to evolve and still play an important role in a reconstructive surgeon’s armamentarium, especially for the more delicate patients who would certainly benefit from simpler surgical procedures. The supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) is a pedicled flap that has recently gained great popularity for reconstruction of most head and neck sites, because of its unusual versatility and wide arc of rotation. SCAIF is a fasciocutaneous flap that is very reliable and both easy and quick to harvest. It is pedicled on the supraclavicular artery, which is a branch of the transverse cervical artery. Between October 2012 and July 2015, at Ospedale San Raffaele (Milan, Italy) and Policlinico San Matteo (Pavia, Italy), we used the SCAIF procedure on 14 patients with cervical and facial skin, oral cavity, oropharyngeal, and hypopharyngeal defects after oncologic surgery or as revision surgery after free-flap failure. The presence of the supraclavicular artery was demonstrated preoperatively by computed tomography angiography. Harvesting time never exceeded 50 min. Functional outcomes were excellent, and the donor site was always closed. We reported only one case of tip desquamation, which was treated conservatively, and two cases of partial flap necrosis, which required revision surgery. In our opinion, SCAIF should be considered to be a valid alternative to free-flap reconstruction, especially for facial and cervical skin, floor-of-mouth, and hypopharyngeal defects; oropharyngeal defects may be harder to reconstruct.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pallua N, Machens H, Rennekampff O, Becker M, Berger A (1997) The fasciocutaneous supraclavicular artery island flap for releasing postburn mentosternal contractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 99(7):1878–1884

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lamberty BG (1979) The supra-clavicular axial patterned flap. Br J Plast Surg 32(3):207–212

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pallua N, Noah EM (2000) The tunneled supraclavicular island flap: an optimized technique for head and neck reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 105(3):842–851

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vinh VQ, Ogawa R, Van Anh T, Hyakusoku H (2007) Reconstruction of neck scar contractures using supraclavicular flaps: retrospective study of 30 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 119(1):130–135

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chiu ES, Liu PH, Friedlander PL (2009) Supraclavicular artery island flap for head and neck oncologic reconstruction: indications, complications, and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(1):115–123. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181aa0e5d

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sandu K, Monnier P, Pasche P (2012) Supraclavicular flap in head and neck reconstruction: experience in 50 consecutive patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269(4):1261–1267. doi:10.1007/s00405-011-1754-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Alves HR, Ishida LC, Ishida LH, Besteiro JM, Gemperli R, Faria JC, Ferreira MC (2012) A clinical experience of the supraclavicular flap used to reconstruct head and neck defects in late-stage cancer patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 65(10):1350–1356. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2012.04.050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Granzow JW, Suliman A, Roostaeian J, Perry A, Boyd JB (2013) The supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) for head and neck reconstruction: surgical technique and refinements. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 148(6):933–940. doi:10.1177/0194599813484288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kokot N, Mazhar K, Reder LS, Peng GL, Sinha UK (2013) The supraclavicular artery island flap in head and neck reconstruction. Applications and limitations. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 139(11):1247–1255. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2013.5057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hanasono MH, Matros E, Disa JJ (2014) Important aspects of head and neck reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(6):968–980. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000000722

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rigby MH, Hayden RE (2014) Regional flaps: a move to simpler reconstructive options in the head and neck. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 22:401–406. doi:10.1097/MOO.0000000000000090

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Giordano L, Bondi S, Toma S, Biafora M (2014) Versatility of the supraclavicular pedicle flap in head and neck reconstruction. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 34:394–398

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim RJT, Izzard ME, Patel RS (2011) Supraclavicular artery island flap for reconstructing defects in head and neck region. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 19:248–250. doi:10.1097/MOO.0b013e328347f811

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Di Benedetto G, Aquinati A, Pierangeli M, Scalise A, Bertani A (2005) From the “charretera” to the supraclavicular fascial island flap: revisitation and further evolution of a controversial flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:70–76

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pallua N, Demir E (2008) Postburn head and neck reconstruction in children with the fasciocutaneous supraclavicular artery island flap. Ann Plast Surg 60:276–282. doi:10.1097/SAP.0b013e3180db2775

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vinh VQ, Van Anh T, Ogawa R, Hyakusoku H (2009) Anatomical and clinical studies of the supraclavicular flap: analysis of 103 flaps used to reconstruct neck scar contractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 123(5):1471–1480. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181a205ba

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chiu ES, Liu PH, Baratelli R, Lee MY, Chaffin AE, Friedlander PL (2009) Circumferential pharyngoesophageal reconstruction with a supraclavicular artery island flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:161–166. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c4951e

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pallua N, Wolter TP (2010) Defect classification and reconstruction algorithm for patients with tracheostomy using the tunneled supraclavicular artery island flap. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395:1115–1119. doi:10.1007/s00423-010-0654-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen WL, Zhang DM, Yang ZH, Huang ZQ, Wang JL, Zhang B, Li JS (2010) Extended supraclavicular fasciocutaneous island flap based on the transverse cervical artery for head and neck reconstruction after cancer ablation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68:2422–2430. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2010.01.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Epps MT, Cannon CL, Wright MJ, Chaffin AE, Newsome RE, Friedlander PL, Chiu ES (2011) Aesthetic restoration of parotidectomy contour deformity using the supraclavicular artery island flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:1925–1931. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e31820cf40a

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Levy JM, Eko FN, St. Hilaire H, Friedlander PL, Melgar MA, Chiu ES (2011) Posterolateral skull base reconstruction using the supraclavicular artery island flap. J Craniofac Surg 22:1751–1754. doi:10.1097/SCS.0b013e31822e62e9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Anand AG, Tran EJ, Hasney CP, Friedlander PL, Chiu ES (2012) Oropharyngeal reconstruction using the supraclavicular artery island flap: a new flap alternative. Plast Reconstr Surg 129:438–441. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e31823aebce

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu H, Chen WL, Yang ZH (2012) Functional reconstruction with an extended supraclavicular fasciocutaneous island flap following ablation of advanced oropharyngeal cancer. J Craniofac Surg 23:1668–1671. doi:10.1097/SCS.0b013e318266f948

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Su T, Pirgousis T, Fernandes R (2013) Versatility of supraclavicular artery island flap in head and neck reconstruction of vessel-depleted and difficult necks. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 71:622–627. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2012.07.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sever C, Kulahci Y, Eren F, Sahin C, Yuksel F (2013) Reconstruction of postburn cervical contractures using expanded supraclavicular artery flap. J Burn Care Res 34:e221–e227. doi:10.1097/BCR.0b013e3182721773

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Loghmani S, Eidy M, Mohammadzadeh M, Loghmani A, Raigan F (2013) The supraclavicular flap for reconstruction of post-burn mentosternal contractures. Iran Red Crescent Med J 15:292–297. doi:10.5812/ircmj.1600

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Emerick KS, Herr MA, Deschler DG (2014) Supraclavicular flap reconstruction following total laryngectomy. Laryngoscope 124:1777–1782. doi:10.1002/lary.24530

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Emerick KS, Herr MW, Lin DT, Santos F, Deschler DG (2014) Supraclavicular artery island flap for reconstruction of complex parotidectomy, lateral skull base, and total auriculectomy defects. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 140:861–866. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2014.1394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kokot N, Mazhar K, Reder LS, Peng GL, Sinha UK (2014) Use of the supraclavicular artery island flap for reconstruction of cervicofacial defects. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 150:222–228. doi:10.1177/0194599813514205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chu MW, Levy JM, Friedlander PL, Chiu ES (2015) Tracheostoma reconstruction with the supraclavicular artery island flap. Ann Plast Surg 74:677–679. doi:10.1097/SAP.0b013e3182a9e9bd

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Razdan SN, Albornoz CR, Ro T, Cordeiro PG, Disa JJ, McCarthy CM, Sterb CS, Garfein ES, Matros E (2015) Safety of the supraclavicular artery island flap in the setting of neck dissection and radiation therapy. J Reconstr Microsurg 31:378–383. doi:10.1055/s-0035-1546294

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Kozin ED, Sethi RK, Herr M, Shrime MG, Rocco JW, Lin D, Deschler DG, Emerick KS (2016) Comparison of perioperative outcomes between the supraclavicular artery island flap and fasciocutaneous free flap. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 154:66–72. doi:10.1177/0194599815607345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Granzow JW, Suliman A, Roostaeian J, Perry A, Boyd JB (2013) Supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) vs free fasciocutaneous flaps for head and neck reconstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 148:941–948. doi:10.1177/0194599813476670

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Adams AS, Wright MJ, Johnston S, Tandon R, Gupta N, Ward K, Hanemann C, Palacios E, Friedlander PL, Chiu ES (2012) The use of multislice CT angiography preoperative study for supraclavicular artery island flap harvesting. Ann Plast Surg 69:312–315. doi:10.1097/SAP.0b013e31822afaba

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sands TT, Martin JB, Simms E, Henderson MM, Friedlander PL, Chiu ES (2012) Supraclavicular artery island flap innervation: anatomical studies and clinical implications. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 65:68–71. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2011.08.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leone Giordano.

Ethics declarations

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human participants

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Additional informed consent was obtained from all individual participants for whom identifying information is included in this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Giordano, L., Di Santo, D., Occhini, A. et al. Supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF): a rising opportunity for head and neck reconstruction. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273, 4403–4412 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4092-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4092-4

Keywords

Navigation