Skip to main content
Log in

Superselective microcoil embolization in severe intractable epistaxis: an analysis of 12 consecutive cases from an otorhinolaryngologic and an interventional neuroradiologic point of view

  • Rhinology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

From 2006 to 2013, 12 patients with severe epistaxis refractory to prior conservative and surgical therapy were treated by superselective embolization of nasal arteries. Supersoft platinum microcoils with smallest diameters were used as the sole embolic agent in all cases. Coils were applied far distally in a stretched position for obtaining ideal target vessel superselectivity. The objective of this study is to evaluate efficacy and complications of superselective coil embolization for treatment of severe intractable epistaxis and to discuss results from an otorhinolaryngologic and an interventional neuroradiologic point of view. Retrospectively, all epistaxis inpatients between 2006 and 2013 were identified and subdivided by form of treatment: conservative, surgical and interventional therapy. Medical records of interventionally treated patients were reviewed for demographics, medical history, risk factors, clinical data, complications and short-term success, and patients were followed up for long-term success. Mean follow-up was 37 months. In 12 patients, 14 embolizations were carried out, with short-term success in 9 patients (75 %), while early post-interventional rebleeding occurred in 3 patients (25 %). Of 9 patients with short-term success, 1 died during stay, 1 was lost to follow-up and 1 had minor re-bleeding after 30 months. Six patients had short-term and long-term success. Before the first embolization, 3 ± 1 conservative and/or surgical procedures had been undertaken. Length of stay was 12.8 ± 3.6 days. 8 patients (67 %) received red cell concentrates. Most frequent complications were mucosal damage and nasal pain, but these were related to repeated packing and surgery. Typical embolic complications as neurological or visual impairment or soft tissue necrosis were not observed in any patient. From the otorhinolaryngologic point of view, surgery is the treatment of choice in severe refractory epistaxis, but in case of repeated failure, superselective microcoil embolization is a valuable addition to the therapeutic spectrum. From the interventional neuroradiologic point of view, superselective microcoil embolization is an effective, well tolerable and safe procedure and complications may be reduced in comparison to microparticle embolization. Modern supersoft microcoils with smallest diameters enable ideal superselectivity of the target vessels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Walker TW, Macfarlane TV, McGarry GW (2007) The epidemiology and chronobiology of epistaxis: an investigation of Scottish hospital admissions 1995–2004. Clin Otolaryngol 32(5):361–365. doi:10.1111/j.1749-4486.2007.01530.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Melia L, McGarry GW (2011) Epistaxis: update on management. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 19(1):30–35. doi:10.1097/MOO.0b013e328341e1e9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ando Y, Iimura J, Arai S, Arai C, Komori M, Tsuyumu M, Hama T, Shigeta Y, Hatano A, Moriyama H (2014) Risk factors for recurrent epistaxis: importance of initial treatment. Auris Nasus Larynx 41(1):41–45. doi:10.1016/j.anl.2013.05.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Soyka MB, Nikolaou G, Rufibach K, Holzmann D (2011) On the effectiveness of treatment options in epistaxis: an analysis of 678 interventions. Rhinology 49(4):474–478. doi:10.4193/Rhino10.313

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cullen MM, Tami TA (1998) Comparison of internal maxillary artery ligation versus embolization for refractory posterior epistaxis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 118(5):636–642. doi:10.1177/019459989811800512

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Felippu A, Mora R, Guastini L (2011) Endoscopic transnasal cauterization of the anterior ethmoidal artery. Acta Otolaryngol 131(10):1074–1078. doi:10.3109/00016489.2011.593548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Metternich FU, Brusis T (1998) Ethmoid sinus operation for therapy of recurrence severe epistaxis. Laryngorhinootologie 77(10):582–586. doi:10.1055/s-2007-997030

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nouraei SA, Maani T, Hajioff D, Saleh HA, Mackay IS (2007) Outcome of endoscopic sphenopalatine artery occlusion for intractable epistaxis: a 10-year experience. The Laryngoscope 117(8):1452–1456. doi:10.1097/MLG.0b013e318065b86f

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Willems PW, Farb RI, Agid R (2009) Endovascular treatment of epistaxis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30(9):1637–1645. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1607

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Krajina A, Chrobok V (2014) Radiological diagnosis and management of epistaxis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 37(1):26–36. doi:10.1007/s00270-013-0776-y

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gottumukkala R, Kadkhodayan Y, Moran CJ, Cross de WT 3rd, Derdeyn CP (2013) Impact of vessel choice on outcomes of polyvinyl alcohol embolization for intractable idiopathic epistaxis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 24(2):234–239. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2012.10.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sadri M, Midwinter K, Ahmed A, Parker A (2006) Assessment of safety and efficacy of arterial embolisation in the management of intractable epistaxis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 263(6):560–566. doi:10.1007/s00405-006-0010-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Andersen PJ, Kjeldsen AD, Nepper-Rasmussen J (2005) Selective embolization in the treatment of intractable epistaxis. Acta Oto-Laryngol 125(3):293–297. doi:10.1080/00016480410023029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Moreau S, De Rugy MG, Babin E, Courtheoux P, Valdazo A (1998) Supraselective embolization in intractable epistaxis: review of 45 cases. Laryngoscope 108(6):887–888. doi:10.1097/00005537-199806000-00018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tseng EY, Narducci CA, Willing SJ, Sillers MJ (1998) Angiographic embolization for epistaxis: a review of 114 cases. Laryngoscope 108(4):615–619. doi:10.1097/00005537-199804000-00028

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Elahi MM, Parnes LS, Fox AJ, Pelz DM, Lee DH (1995) Therapeutic embolization in the treatment of intractable epistaxis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 121(1):65–69

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Elden L, Montanera W, Terbrugge K, Willinsky R, Lasjaunias P, Charles D (1994) Angiographic embolization for the treatment of epistaxis—a review of 108 cases. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 111(1):44–50

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vitek J (1991) Idiopathic intractable epistaxis: endovascular therapy. Radiology 181(1):113–116. doi:10.1148/radiology.181.1.1887018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fukutsuji K, Nishiike S, Aihara T, Uno M, Harada T, Gyoten M, Imai S (2008) Superselective angiographic embolization for intractable epistaxis. Acta Oto-Laryngol 128(5):556–560. doi:10.1080/00016480701596070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Christensen NP, Smith DS, Barnwell SL, Wax MK (2005) Arterial embolization in the management of posterior epistaxis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 133(5):748–753. doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2005.07.041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Leppanen M, Seppanen S, Laranne J, Kuoppala K (1999) Microcatheter embolization of intractable idiopathic epistaxis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 22(6):499–503. doi:10.1007/S002709900439

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Strach K, Schrock A, Wilhelm K, Greschus S, Tschampa H, Mohlenbruch M, Naehle CP, Jakob M, Gerstner AO, Bootz F, Schild HH, Urbach H (2011) Endovascular treatment of epistaxis: indications, management, and outcome. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 34(6):1190–1198. doi:10.1007/s00270-011-0155-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kramann B, Roth R, Schneider G, Uder M, Federspil P, Iro H (1998) Percutaneous transcatheter embolization in the treatment of refractory nontraumatic epistaxis. Hno 46(12):973–979. doi:10.1007/S001060050344

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Oguni T, Korogi Y, Yasunaga T, Sadanaga T, Uozumi H, Kawanaka K, Sumi S, Takahashi M (2000) Superselective embolisation for intractable idiopathic epistaxis. Brit J Radiol 73(875):1148–1153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cohen JE, Moscovici S, Gomori JM, Eliashar R, Weinberger J, Itshayek E (2012) Selective endovascular embolization for refractory idiopathic epistaxis is a safe and effective therapeutic option: technique, complications, and outcomes. J Clin Neurosci 19(5):687–690. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2011.08.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Duncan IC, Fourie PA, le Grange CE, van der Walt HA (2004) Endovascular treatment of intractable epistaxis–results of a 4-year local audit. S Afr Med J 94(5):373–378

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to D. U. Seidel or D. Meila.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seidel, D.U., Remmert, S., Brassel, F. et al. Superselective microcoil embolization in severe intractable epistaxis: an analysis of 12 consecutive cases from an otorhinolaryngologic and an interventional neuroradiologic point of view. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272, 3317–3326 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3427-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3427-2

Keywords

Navigation