Skip to main content
Log in

The utility of minimally invasive transcanal endoscopic approach for removal of residual/recurrent cholesteatoma: preliminary results

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To investigate the feasibility of applying the transcanal endoscopic approach (TEA) for surgical treatment of residual/recurrent cholesteatoma and present the preliminary results of 17 revision procedures that were carried out with this minimally invasive approach. The records of 17 patients (aged 5–76 years) who underwent transcanal revision procedure using rigid 3-mm diameter, 0°, 30° and 45° endoscopes between 2009 and 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. A wide posterior tympanomeatal flap was elevated via the external auditory canal and then transposed inferiorly in cases of cholesteatoma situated in the middle ear under a tympanic membrane. In certain cases, cholesteatoma was assessed and removed using the endoscopes directly from the radical cavity or from the mastoid cavity remaining after a canal-wall-down procedure. Six patients had originally undergone the canal-wall-up mastoidectomy, 6 patients had a canal-wall-down mastoidectomy and 5 patients had radical mastoid cavities. The interval between the previous and the index surgery ranged between 1 and 6 years. The attic was the most common site involved with cholesteatoma, followed by the tympanic portion of the facial nerve, sinus tympani, mastoid, supratubal recess, promontory, round and oval windows. The size of residual/recurrent lesion varied between 3 and 15 mm. The patients were followed up 26–67 months (mean 52.1 months). The single recurrence (a 4-mm pearl over the tympanic portion of the facial nerve) was eradicated by a transcanal re-revision 1 year following the index surgery. Minimally invasive TEA can be successfully applied in carefully selected patients with endoscopically accessible cholesteatoma subsequent to various types of mastoidectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wilson KF, Hoggan RN, Shelton C (2013) Tympanoplasty with intact canal wall mastoidectomy for cholesteatoma: long-term surgical outcomes. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 149:292–295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tomlin J, Chang D, McCutcheon B, Harris J (2013) Surgical technique and recurrence in cholesteatoma: a meta-analysis. Audiol Neurootol 18:135–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stew BT, Fishpool SJ, Clarke JD, Johnson PM (2013) Can early second-look tympanoplasty reduce the rate of conversion to modified radical mastoidectomy? Acta Otolaryngol 133:590–593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stankovic M (2013) The learning curve in revision cholesteatoma surgery. Am J Otolaryngol 34:65–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Drahy A, De Barros A, Lerosey Y, Choussy O, Dehesdin D, Marie JP (2012) Acquired cholesteatoma in children: strategies and medium-term results. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 129:225–229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gaillardin L, Lescanne E, Morinière S, Cottier JP, Robier A (2012) Residual cholesteatoma: prevalence and location. Follow-up strategy in adults. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 129:136–140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Minovi A, Venjacob J, Volkenstein S, Dornhoffer J, Dazert S (2014) Functional results after cholesteatoma surgery in an adult population using the retrograde mastoidectomy technique. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 271:495–501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Osborn AJ, Papsin BC, James AL (2012) Clinical indications for canal wall-down mastoidectomy in a pediatric population. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 147:316–322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vercruysse JP, De Foer B, Somers T, Casselman JW, Offeciers E (2008) Mastoid and epitympanic bony obliteration in pediatric cholesteatoma. Otol Neurotol 29:953–960

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ayache S, Tramier B, Strunski V (2008) Otoendoscopy in cholesteatoma surgery of the middle ear. What benefits can be expected? Otol Neurotol 29:1085–1090

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Migirov L, Shapira Y, Horowitz Z, Wolf M (2011) Exclusive endoscopic ear surgery for acquired cholesteatoma: preliminary results. Otol Neurotol 32:433–436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Badr-El-Dine M (2009) Surgery of sinus tympani cholesteatoma. Endoscopic necessity. Int Adv Otol 5:158–165

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tarabichi M (2010) Transcanal endoscopic management of cholesteatoma. Otol Neurotol 31:580–588

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Marchioni D, Mattioli F, Alicandri-Ciufelli M, Presutti L (2009) Transcanal endoscopic approach to the sinus tympani: a clinical report. Otol Neurotol 30:758–765

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. James AL (2013) Endoscopic middle ear surgery in children. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 46:233–244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. De Foer B, Vercruysse JP, Spaepen M, Somers T, Pouillon M, Offeciers E, Casselman JW (2010) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the temporal bone. Neuroradiology 52:785–807

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dhepnorrarat RC, Wood B, Rajan GP (2009) Postoperative non-echo-planar diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging changes after cholesteatoma surgery: implications for cholesteatoma screening. Otol Neurotol 30:54–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Profant M, Sláviková K, Kabátová Z, Slezák P, Waczulíková I (2012) Predictive validity of MRI in detecting and following cholesteatoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269:757–765

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Edfeldt L, Strömbäck K, Danckwardt-Lillieström N, Rask-Andersen H, Abdsaleh S, Wikström J (2013) Non-echo planar diffusion-weighted MRI increases follow-up accuracy after one-step step canal wall-down obliteration surgery for cholesteatoma. Acta Otolaryngol 133:574–583

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Migirov L, Wolf M, Greenberg G, Eyal A (2014) Non-EPI DW MRI in planning the surgical approach to primary and recurrent cholesteatoma. Otol Neurotol 1:121–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lela Migirov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Migirov, L., Yakirevitch, A. & Wolf, M. The utility of minimally invasive transcanal endoscopic approach for removal of residual/recurrent cholesteatoma: preliminary results. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272, 3241–3246 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3402-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3402-y

Keywords

Navigation