Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Quality of life in bimodal hearing users (unilateral cochlear implants and contralateral hearing aids)

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main objective was to evaluate the bimodal self-rated benefits on auditory performance under real conditions and the quality of life in two groups of cochlear-implanted adults, with or without a contralateral hearing aid. The secondary objective was to investigate correlations between the use of a hearing aid and residual hearing on the non-implanted ear. This retrospective study was realized between 2000 and 2010 in two referral centers. A population of 183 postlingually deaf adults, implanted with a cochlear experience superior to 6 months, was selected. The Speech, Spatial, and other Qualities of Hearing Scale were administered to evaluate the auditory performances, and the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire to evaluate the quality of life. The population was divided into two groups: a group with unilateral cochlear implants (Cochlear Implant-alone, n = 54), and a bimodal group with a cochlear implant and a contralateral hearing aid (n = 62). Both groups were similar in terms of auditory deprivation duration, duration of cochlear implant use, and pure-tone average on the implanted ear. There was a significant difference in terms of pure-tone average on low and low-to-mid frequencies on the non-implanted ear. The scores on both questionnaires showed an improvement in the basic sound perception and quality of social activities for the bimodal group. The results suggest that the bimodal stimulation (cochlear implant and contralateral hearing aid) improved auditory perception in quiet and the quality of life domain of social activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ching TY, Van Wanrooy E, Dillon H (2007) Binaural-bimodal fitting or bilateral amplification for management severe to profound deafness: a review. Trends Amplif 11(3):161–192

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gordon KA, Salloum C, Toor GS et al (2012) Binaural interactions develop in the auditory brainstem of children who are deaf: effects of place and level of bilateral electrical stimulation. J Neurosci 32(12):4212–4223

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ching TY, Incerti P, Hill M (2004) Binaural benefits for adults who use hearing aids and cochlear implants in opposite ears. Ear Hear 25(1):9–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ching TY, Psarros C, Hill M et al (2001) Should children who use cochlear implants wear hearing aids in the opposite ear? Ear Hear 22(5):365–380

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ching TY, Incerti P, Hill M et al (2004) Would children who did not wear a hearing aid after implantation benefit from using a hearing aid with a cochlear implant in opposite ears? Cochlear Implants Int 5(Suppl 1):92–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ching TY, Van Wanrooy E, Hill M et al (2005) Binaural redundancy and inter-aural time difference cues for patients wearing a cochlear implant and a hearing aid in opposite ears. Int J Audiol 44(9):513–521

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ching TY (2005) The evidence calls for making binaural-bimodal fittings routine. Hear J 58(11):32–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Blamey PJ, Dooley GJ, James CJ et al (2000) Monaural and binaural loudness measures in cochlear implant users with contralateral residual hearing. Ear Hear 21(1):6–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mok M, Grayden D, Dowell RC et al (2006) Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears. J Speech Lang Hear Res 49(2):338–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bond M, Elston J, Mealing S et al (2009) The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cochlear implants for severe to profound deafness in children and adults: a systematic review and economic model. Health Technol Assess 13(3):1–330

    Google Scholar 

  11. Armstrong M, Pegg P, James C et al (1997) Speech perception in noise with implant and hearing aid. Am J Otol 18:S140–S141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sucher CM, McDermott HJ (2009) Bimodal stimulation: benefits for music perception and sound quality. Cochlear Implants Int 10(S1):96–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gatehouse S, Noble W (2004) The speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol 43(2):85–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Noble W, Gatehouse S (2006) Effects of bilateral versus unilateral hearing aid fitting on abilities measured by the speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol 45:172–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hinderink JB, Krabbe PFM, Van Den Broek P (2000) Development and application of a health-related quality-of-life for adults with cochlear implants: the Nijmegen cochlear implant questionnaire. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123:756–765

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tyler RS, Parkinson AJ, Wilson BS et al (2002) Patients utilizing a hearing aid and a cochlear implant: speech perception and localization. Ear Hear 23(2):98–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yoon YS, Shin YR, Fu QJ (2012) Clinical selection criteria for a second cochlear implant for bimodal listeners. Otol Neurotol 33(7):1161–1168

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Neuman AC, Svirsky MA (2013) Effect of hearing aid bandwidth on speech recognition performance of listeners using a cochlear implant and contralateral hearing aid (bimodal hearing). Ear Hear 34(5):553–561

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shpak T, Most T, Luntz M (2014) Fundamental frequency information for speech recognition via bimodal stimulation: cochlear implant in one ear and hearing aid in the other. Ear Hear 35(1):97–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Noble W, Tyler RS, Dunn C et al (2008) Unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants and the implant-plus-hearing aid profile: comparing self-assessed and measured abilities. Int J Audiol 47:505–514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gfeller KE, Olszewski C, Turner C et al (2006) Music perception with cochlear implants and residual hearing. Audiol Neurootol 11(Suppl 1):12–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cohen S, Labadie R, Dietrich M et al (2004) Quality of life in hearing-impaired adults: the role of cochlear implants and hearing aids. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131(4):413–422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dunn CC, Tyler RS, Witt SA (2005) Benefit of wearing a hearing aid in the unimplanted ear in adult users of a cochlear implant. J Speech Lang Hear Res 48(3):668–680

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ching TY, Incerti P, Hill M et al (2006) An overview of binaural advantages for children and adults who use binaural/bimodal hearing devices. Audiol Neurootol 11(Suppl 1):6–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fitzpatrick EM, Séguin C, Schramm D et al (2009) User’s experience of a cochlear implant combined with a hearing aid. Int J Audiol 48:172–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Olze H, Gräbel S, Haupt H et al (2012) Extra benefit of a second cochlear implant with respect to health-related quality of life and tinnitus. Otol Neurotol 33(7):1169–1175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, CHU La Timone Hospital, 264, avenue Saint Pierre, 13385, Marseille Cedex 5, France

    A. Farinetti, S. Roman & J. M. Triglia

  2. Aix-Marseille University, Inserm, IRD, UMR912, SESSTIM, Marseille, 13273, France

    J. Mancini

  3. Public Health Department, APHM, La Timone Hospital, 13385, Marseille, France

    J. Mancini

  4. Medical Statistics Laboratory, La Timone University, 13385, Marseille Cedex 5, France

    K. Baumstarck-Barrau

  5. Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Nord Hospital, 13915, Marseille Cedex 20, France

    R. Meller & J. P. Lavieille

Authors
  1. A. Farinetti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Roman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. Mancini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. K. Baumstarck-Barrau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. R. Meller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. J. P. Lavieille
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. J. M. Triglia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Farinetti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Farinetti, A., Roman, S., Mancini, J. et al. Quality of life in bimodal hearing users (unilateral cochlear implants and contralateral hearing aids). Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272, 3209–3215 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3377-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3377-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation