Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Use of data mining to predict significant factors and benefits of bilateral cochlear implantation

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data mining (DM) is a technique used to discover pattern and knowledge from a big amount of data. It uses artificial intelligence, automatic learning, statistics, databases, etc. In this study, DM was successfully used as a predictive tool to assess disyllabic speech test performance in bilateral implanted patients with a success rate above 90 %. 60 bilateral sequentially implanted adult patients were included in the study. The DM algorithms developed found correlations between unilateral medical records and Audiological test results and bilateral performance by establishing relevant variables based on two DM techniques: the classifier and the estimation. The nearest neighbor algorithm was implemented in the first case, and the linear regression in the second. The results showed that patients with unilateral disyllabic test results below 70 % benefited the most from a bilateral implantation. Finally, it was observed that its benefits decrease as the inter-implant time increases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bakar AA, Othman Z, Ismail R, Zakari Z (2009) Using rough set theory for mining the level of hearing loss diagnosis knowledge. International conference on electrical engineering and informatics

  2. Banks D, House L, McMorris FR, Arabie P, Gaul W (2004) Classification, clustering and data mining applications. Duke University. Springer

  3. Gatehouse S (1999) Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile: Derivation and validation of a client-centered outcome measure for hearing-aid services. J Am Acad Audiol 10:80–103

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hall M, Frank E, Holmes G, Pfahringer B, Reutemann P, Witten IH (2009) The WEKA Data Mining Software: an update. SIGKDD explorations, vol 11, issue 1

  5. Han J, Kamber M (2001) Data mining: concepts and techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kilgard MP, Pandya PK, Vazquez J, Gehi A, Schreiner CE, Merzenich MM (2001) Sensory input directs spatial and temporal plasticity in primary auditory cortex. J Neurophysiol 86:326–338

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim L, Jang YS, Choi A, Ahn S, Park J, Lee Y, Jeong S (2009) Bilateral cochlear implants in children. Cochlear Implants Int 10:74–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Montes-Jovellar L, Guillen-Grima F, Perez-Fernandez N (2011) Cluster analysis of auditory and vestibular test results in definite Menière’s disease. Laryngoscope 121:1810–1817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ramos de Miguel A, Perez Zaballos MT, Ramos A (2014) LifeQuestionnaire. http://www.lifequestionnaire.com

  10. van Hoesel RJM (2004) Exploring the benefits of bilateral cochlear implants. Audiol Neurotol 9:234–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Robertson D, Irvine DRF (1989) Plasticity of frequency organization in auditory cortex of guinea pigs with partial unilateral deafness. J Comp Neurol 282:456–471

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rubinstein JT, Parkinson WS, Tyler RS, Gantz BJ (1999) Residual speech recognition and cochlear implant performance: effects of implantation criteria. Am J Otol 20:445–452

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Steffens Y, Lesinski-Schiedat A, Strutz J, Aschendorff A, Klenzner T, Rühl S, Voss B, Wesarg T, Laszig R, Lenarz T (2008) The benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation for hearing-impaired children. Acta Oto-Laryngol 128(2):164–176

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zwolan TA, O’Sullivan MB, Fink NE, Niparko JK, The CDACI Investigative Team (2008) Electric charge requirements of pediatric cochlear implant recipients enrolled in the childhood development after cochlear implantation study. Otol Neurotol 29:143–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angel Ramos-Miguel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramos-Miguel, A., Perez-Zaballos, T., Perez, D. et al. Use of data mining to predict significant factors and benefits of bilateral cochlear implantation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272, 3157–3162 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3337-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3337-3

Keywords

Navigation