Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of rhinoplasty on psychosocial distress level and quality of life

  • Rhinology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate psychosocial distress and improvement in quality of life (QoL) of patients undergoing rhinoplasty and compare the level of distress associated with the types of rhinoplasty. A total of 79 patients who underwent external rhinoplasty were enrolled in the study. The patients were grouped due to primary, secondary, functional and cosmetic rhinoplasty. The patients were evaluated four times: preoperative evaluation, 4th, 12th, and 24th weeks postoperatively and completed questionnaires including the rhinoplasty outcome evaluation (ROE) scale, nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) scale, and Derriford Appearance Scale 24 every four visit. The revision cases and patients with cosmetic indication have more emotional distress than others at the preoperative and early postoperative period (p < 0.005). However, the distress level equalize and return baseline values beyond 12 weeks. The ROE and NOSE scores of all patients were very significantly improved by the rhinoplasty (p < 0.001). To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate changes in distress of patients undergoing rhinoplasty using DAS-24 scale. The psychosocial distress has a significant impact on quality of life and, therefore, it is an important factor to assess the success of surgery. In addition, regardless of initial demand and type of surgery, rhinoplasty provides improvement in nasal obstruction, and a positive impact on QoL in most of the patients undergoing rhinoplasty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Picavet VA, Prokopakis EP, Gabriëls L, Jorissen M, Hellings PW (2011) High prevalence of body dysmorphic disorder symptoms in patients seeking rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 128:509–517

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Meningaud JP, Lantieri L, Bertrand JC (2008) Rhinoplasty: an outcome research. Plast Reconstr Surg 121:251–257

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pepper JP, Asaria J, Kim JC, Baker SR, Moyer JS (2012) Patient assessment of psychosocial dysfunction following nasal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 129:430–437

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ching S, Thoma A, McCabe RE, Antony MM (2003) Measuring outcomes in aesthetic surgery: a comprehensive review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:469–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mendis D, Cheang PP, Glossop LP (2013) Audit: patient reported outcomes of extracorporeal septorhinoplasty. Rhinology 51:88–92

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Erdogan BA, Avseren E, Paksoy M, Bora F, Altin G (2013) Assessing quality of life in septorhinoplasty patients with two different instruments. B-EN 9:277–283

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Carr T, Moss T, Harris D (2005) The DAS24: a short form of the Derriford Appearance Scale DAS59 to measure individual responses to living with problems of appearance. Br J Health Psycho. 10:285–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Moss T, Harris D, Carr T (2005) Manual for the Derriford Appearance Scale 24 (DAS24). Br J Health Psychol 10:285–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Alsarraf R (2000) Outcome research in facial plastic surgery: a review and new directions. Aesthetic Plast Surg 24:192–197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Alsarraf R, Larrabee WF, Anderson S, Murakami CS, Johnson CM Jr (2001) Measuring cosmetic facial plastic surgery outcomes: a pilot study. Arch Facial Plast Surg 3:198–201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stewart MG, Witsell DL, Smith TL, Weaver EM, Yueh B, Hannley MT (2004) Development and validation of the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) scale. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130:157–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sarwer DB, Infield AL, Baker JL et al (2008) Two-year results of a prospective, multi-site investigation of patient satisfaction and psychosocial status following cosmetic surgery. Aesthet Surg J 28:245–250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Simsek G, Demirtas E (2014) Comparison of surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction after 2 different rhinoplasty techniques. J Craniofac Surg 25:1284–1286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Won TB, Park KT, Moon SJ, Moon IJ, Wee JH, Moss T et al (2013) The effect of septorhinoplasty on quality of life and nasal function in Asians. Ann Plast Surg 71:40–44

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jacobson WE, Edgerton MT, Meyer E, Canter A, Slaughter R (1960) Psychiatric evaluation of male patients seeking cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull 26:356–372

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Harris DL, Carr AT (2001) The Derriford Appearance Scale (DAS59): a new psychometric scale for the evaluation of patients with disfigurements and aesthetic problems of appearance. Br J Plast Surg 54:216–222

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cingi C, Eskiizmir G, Cakli H (2012) Comparative analysis of primary and secondary rhinoplasties according to surgeon’s perspective, patient satisfaction, and quality of life. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 121:322–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kahveci OK, Miman MC, Yucel A, Yucedag F, Okur E, Altuntas A (2012) The efficiency of nose obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) scale on patients with nasal septal deviation. Auris Nasus Larynx 39:275–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has any conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ceren Günel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Günel, C., Omurlu, I.K. The effect of rhinoplasty on psychosocial distress level and quality of life. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272, 1931–1935 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3282-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3282-1

Keywords

Navigation