Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare audiometric results before and after stapes surgery and identify potential prognostic factors to appropriately select patients with otosclerosis who will most likely benefit from surgery. We enrolled 126 patients with otosclerosis (162 consecutive ears) in our study who underwent stapes surgery between 2007 and 2012 at our institution. Preoperative and postoperative data including pure-tone audiometry, speech audiometry, stapedial reflex audiometry and surgical data were analyzed. The average preoperative air-bone gap (ABG) was 28.9 ± 8.6 dB. Male patients and patients older than 45 years of age had greater preoperative ABGs in comparison to females and younger patients. Postoperative ABGs were 11.2 ± 7.4 dB. The average ABG gain was 17.7 ± 11.1 dB. Preoperative audiometric data, age, gender and type of surgery did not influence the postoperative results. Stapes surgery offers predictable results independent from disease progression or patient-related factors. While absolute values of hearing improvement are instrumental in reflecting audiometric results of a cohort, relative values better reflect individual’s audiometric data resembling the patient’s benefit.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Menger DJ, Tange RA (2003) The aetiology of otosclerosis: a review of the literature. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 28:112–120
Declau F, Van Spaendonck M, Timmermans JP et al (2001) Prevalence of otosclerosis in an unselected series of temporal bones. Otol Neurotol 22:596–602
Shea JJ (1958) Fenestration of the oval window. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 67:932–951
Fisch U (2009) Stapedotomy versus stapedectomy. Otol Neurotol 30:1166–1167
Spandow O, Söderberg O, Bohlin L (2000) Long-term results in otosclerotic patients operated by stapedectomy or stapedotomy. Scand Audiol 29:186–190
Mishiro Y, Sakagami M, Kitahara T, Kakutani C (2009) Prognostic factors of long-term outcomes after ossiculoplasty using multivariate analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267:861–865. doi:10.1007/s00405-009-1133-2
Nevoux J, Moya-Plana A, Chauvin P et al (2011) Total ossiculoplasty in children: predictive factors and long-term follow-up. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 137:1240–1246. doi:10.1001/archoto.2011.204
De Vos C, Gersdorff M, Gérard J-M (2007) Prognostic factors in ossiculoplasty. Otol Neurotol 28:61–67. doi:10.1097/01.mao.0000231598.33585.8f
Bernardo MT, Dias J, Ribeiro D et al (2012) Long term outcome of otosclerosis surgery. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 78:115–119
Devèze A, Koka K, Tringali S et al (2010) Active middle ear implant application in case of stapes fixation: a temporal bone study. Otol Neurotol 31:1027–1034. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181edb6d1
Gérard J-M, Serry P, Gersdorff MC (2008) Outcome and lack of prognostic factors in stapes surgery. Otol Neurotol 29:290–294. doi:10.1097/mao.0b013e318161ab0f
Bittermann AJN (2011) Primary stapes surgery in patients with otosclerosis prediction of postoperative outcome. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 137:780. doi:10.1001/archoto.2011.100
Ueda H, Miyazawa T, Asahi K, Yanagita N (1999) Factors affecting hearing results after stapes surgery. J Laryngol Otol 113:417–421
Salvinelli F, Casale M, Peco VD et al (2003) Stapedoplasty in patients with small air–bone gap: why not? Med Hypotheses 60:535–537. doi:10.1016/S0306-9877(03)00003-3
(1995) Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of results of treatment of conductive hearing loss. AmericanAcademy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Ffoundation, Inc. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 113:186–187
Minovi A, Probst G, Dazert S (2009) Current concepts in the surgical management of otosclerosis. HNO 57:273–286. doi:10.1007/s00106-009-1888-1
Becvarovski Z, Kartush JM (2001) Smoking and tympanoplasty: implications for prognosis and the Middle Ear Risk Index (MERI). Laryngoscope 111:1806–1811. doi:10.1097/00005537-200110000-00026
Black B (1992) Ossiculoplasty prognosis: the spite method of assessment. Am J Otol 13:544–551
Yung M, Vowler SL (2006) Long-term results in ossiculoplasty: an analysis of prognostic factors. Otol Neurotol 27:874–881. doi:10.1097/01.mao.0000226305.43951.13
Marchese MR, Conti G, Cianfrone F et al (2009) Predictive role of audiological and clinical features for functional results after stapedotomy. Audiol Neurotol 14:279–285. doi:10.1159/000212105
Lachance S, Bussières R, Côté M (2012) Stapes surgery in profound hearing loss due to otosclerosis. Otol Neurotol 33:721–723. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182565a0e
Ueda H, Miyazawa T, Yanagita N (1998) The influence of age and sex on the results of otosclerosis surgery. Nippon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho 101:185–191
Just T, Guder E, Pau HW (2012) Auris Nasus Larynx. Auris Nasus Larynx 39:383–386. doi:10.1016/j.anl.2011.07.009
Luntz M, Yehudai N, Most T (2009) Hearing rehabilitation counseling for patients with otosclerosis-related hearing loss. Otol Neurotol 30:1037–1043. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e318196966f
Caylakli F, Yavuz H, Yilmazer C et al (2009) Otolaryngology—head and neck surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 141:12–15. doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2009.02.023
Satar B, Şen D, Karahatay S et al (2006) Effect of cochlear reserve on postoperative outcome in otosclerosis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 264:489–493. doi:10.1007/s00405-006-0205-9
Somers T, Vercruysse J-P, Zarowski A et al (2006) Stapedotomy with microdrill or carbon dioxide laser: influence on inner ear function. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 115:880–885 discussion 886
Somers T, Vercruysse JP, Zarowski A et al (2007) Transient depression of inner ear function after stapedotomy: skeeter versus CO(2) laser technique. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 65:267–272. doi:10.1159/000098841
Sperling NM, Sury K, Gordon J, Cox S (2013) Early postoperative results in stapedectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 149:918–923. doi:10.1177/0194599813507232
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koopmann, M., Weiss, D., Savvas, E. et al. Outcome measures in stapes surgery: postoperative results are independent from preoperative parameters. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272, 2175–2181 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3113-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3113-4