Skip to main content
Log in

Prognostic value of preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT for primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

18F-FDG PET/CT is clinically useful in the initial staging and follow-up of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). We studied the potential prognostic significance of preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT in HNSCC. The medical records of 294 patients who underwent preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT for HNSCC were retrospectively reviewed. The median SUVmax of the primary lesions (SUVmax-p) and cervical lymph nodes (SUVmax-n) was 7.98 ± 5.04 (range 1.2–28.7) and 3.34 ± 3.70 (range 1.0–20.4), respectively. There was a significant difference between with and without recurrence in SUVmax-p (11.14 ± 5.36 vs. 6.78 ± 4.35, p < 0.001) and SUVmax-n (5.60 ± 4.22 vs. 1.75 ± 1.46, p < 0.001). The cut-off values of SUVmax-p and SUVmax-n in the context of recurrence and cancer-related death were 8.5 and 3.5. The 5-year disease-free survival of patients with SUVmax-p < 8.5 and SUVmax-n < 3.5 was 79 and 79 %, respectively, whereas that of patients with SUVmax-p ≥ 8.5 and SUVmax-n ≥ 3.5 was 39 and 30 %, respectively. Multivariate analysis confirmed the significant association between 5-year disease-free survival and SUVmax-p ≥ 8.5 (hazard ratio (HR) 2.68, p < 0.001) and SUVmax-n ≥ 3.5 (HR 2.29, p = 0.007). Furthermore, SUVmax-p ≥ 8.5 (HR 3.20, p = 0.012) and SUVmax-n ≥ 3.5 (HR 2.14, p < 0.001) were associated with 5-year overall survival. 18F-FDG PET/CT cut-off values of SUVmax-p ≥ 8.5 or SUVmax-n ≥ 3.5 are associated with a recurrence and survival in HNSCC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jain S, Khuri FR, Shin DM (2004) Prevention of head and neck cancer: current status and future prospects. Curr Probl Cancer 28:265–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A (2012) Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 62:10–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Machtay M, Natwa M, Andrel J, Hyslop T, Anne PR, Lavarino J et al (2009) Pretreatment FDG-PET standardized uptake value as a prognostic factor for outcome in head and neck cancer. Head Neck 31:195–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ng SH, Yen TC, Liao CT, Chang JT, Chan SC, Ko SF et al (2005) 18F-FDG PET and CT/MRI in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective study of 124 patients with histologic correlation. J Nucl Med 46:1136–1143

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ng SH, Yen TC, Chang JT, Chan SC, Ko SF, Wang HM et al (2006) Prospective study of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma with palpably negative neck. J Clin Oncol 24:4371–4376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kunkel M, Reichert TE, Benz P, Lehr HA, Jeong JH, Wieand S et al (2003) Overexpression of Glut-1 and increased glucose metabolism in tumors are associated with a poor prognosis in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer 97:1015–1024

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Allal AS, Slosman DO, Kebdani T, Allaoua M, Lehmann W, Dulguerov P (2004) Prediction of outcome in head-and-neck cancer patients using the standardized uptake value of 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 59:1295–1300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Liao CT, Chang JT, Wang HM, Ng SH, Hsueh C, Lee LY et al (2009) Pretreatment primary tumor SUVmax measured by FDG-PET and pathologic tumor depth predict for poor outcomes in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma and pathologically positive lymph nodes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 73:764–771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoshikawa H, Mitani T, Nishiyama Y, Yamamoto Y, Ohkawa M, Mori N (2009) Evaluation of the therapeutic effects and recurrence for head and neck cancer after chemoradiotherapy by FDG-PET. Auris Nasus Larynx 36:192–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Minn H, Lapela M, Klemi PJ, Grénman R, Leskinen S, Lindholm P et al (1997) Prediction of survival with fluorine-18-fluoro-deoxyglucose and PET in head and neck cancer. J Nucl Med 38:1907–1911

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wong RJ, Lin DT, Schoder H, Patel SG, Gonen M, Wolden S et al (2002) Diagnostic and prognostic value of [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 20:4199–4208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Allal AS, Dulguerov P, Allaoua M, Haenggeli CA, el El-Ghazi A, Lehmann W et al (2002) Standardized uptake value of 2-[(18)F] fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose in predicting outcome in head and neck carcinomas treated by radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 20:1398–1404

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim SY, Roh JL, Kim MR, Kim JS, Choi SH, Nam SY et al (2007) Use of 18F-FDG PET for primary treatment strategy in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx. J Nucl Med 48:752–757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zasadny KR, Wahl RL (1993) Standardized uptake values of normal tissues at PET with 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose: variations with body weight and a method for correction. Radiology 189:847–850

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bernier J, Cooper JS, Pajak TF, van Glabbeke M, Bourhis J, Forastiere A et al (2005) Defining risk levels in locally advanced head and neck cancers: a comparative analysis of concurrent postoperative radiation plus chemotherapy trials of the EORTC (#22931) and RTOG (#9501). Head Neck 27:843–850

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cooper JS, Pajak TF, Forastiere A, Jacobs J, Fu KK, Ang KK et al (1998) Precisely defining high-risk operable head-and-neck tumors based on RTOG#85-03 and RTOG#88-24: targets for postoperative chemoradiotherapy? Head Neck 20:588–594

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ang KK, Trotti A, Brown BW, Garden AS, Foote RL, Morrison WH et al (2001) Randomized trial addressing risk features and time factors of surgery plus radiotherapy in advanced head-and neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 51:571–578

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosenthal DI, Liu L, Lee JH, Vapiwala N, Chalian AA, Weinstein GS et al (2002) Importance of treatment package time in surgery and postoperative radiation therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Head Neck 24:115–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Beaulieu S, Kinahan P, Tseng J, Dunnwald LK, Schubert EK, Pham P et al (2003) SUV varies with time after injection in (18)F-FDG PET of breast cancer: characterization and method to adjust for time differences. J Nucl Med 44:1044–1050

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lindholm P, Minn H, Leskinen-Kallio S, Bergman J, Ruotsalainen U, Joensuu H (1993) Influence of the blood glucose concentration on FDG uptake in cancer—a PET study. J Nucl Med 34:1–6

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min-Sik Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Joo, YH., Yoo, IR., Cho, KJ. et al. Prognostic value of preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT for primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 271, 1685–1691 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2605-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2605-y

Keywords

Navigation