Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Temporary removal of the posterior bony canal wall with reconstruction using microplate osteosynthesis in cholesteatoma surgery: a case series and description of the technique

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We describe the surgical technique of temporary removal of the posterior auditory canal wall with reconstruction and report the outcome of using this technique as a treatment method for cholesteatoma in a case series. In 32 cases of cholesteatoma surgery a technique of temporary removal of the posterior bony wall was applied. During primary surgery the posterior auditory canal wall was removed using an oscillating saw. For the purpose of reconstruction, the canal wall was repositioned and fixed using two titanium microplates (n = 26). In case the canal wall could not be reconstructed with osteosynthesis, either glass-ionomeric cement (BioCem™) was used for fixation (n = 4) or fibrin glue (Tissucol™) (n = 2) to support the posterior wall. The outcome includes the healing process in the first postoperative month, the absence of residual or recurrent disease and the successful reconstruction of the posterior auditory canal wall as evaluated during second-look surgery. When microplates where used, we saw healing problems of the canal skin in about 4 % of patients. Recurrent cholesteatoma was found in 4 cases (14 %), residual cholesteatoma in 8 ears (25 %). In the osteosynthesis group, successful reconstruction was achieved in 25 patients (96 %). In 3 out of 4 patients of the glass-ionomeric cement group (75 %) excessive granulation tissue developed with extensive bony lysis. Temporary removal of the posterior auditory canal wall offers potential for the control of cholesteatoma. Our first results suggest that osteosynthesis allows for a good anatomical and functional reconstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. aWengen DF, Podvinec M (1998) Fixation of the temporarily removed posterior wall of the auditory canal with plate osteosynthesis: a new technique. Laryngo Rhino Otol 77(2):70–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Della Santina CC, Lee SC (2006) Ceravital reconstruction of canal wall down mastoidectomy: long-term results. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 132(6):617–623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dornhoffer JL (2000) Retrograde mastoidectomy with canal wall reconstruction: a single-stage technique for cholesteatoma removal. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 109(11):1033–1039

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dornhoffer JL (2004) Retrograde mastoidectomy with canal wall reconstruction: a follow-up report. Otol Neurotol 25(5):653–660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dornhoffer JL (2006) Retrograde mastoidectomy. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 39(6):1115–1127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Haginomori S, Takamaki A, Nonaka R, Mineharu A, Kanazawa A, Takenaka H (2009) Postoperative aeration in the middle ear and hearing outcome after canal wall down tympanoplasty with soft-wall reconstruction for cholesteatoma. Otol Neurotol 30(4):478–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McElveen JT Jr, Chung AT (2003) Reversible canal wall down mastoidectomy for acquired cholesteatomas: preliminary results. Laryngoscope 113(6):1027–1033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Feldmann H (1978) Osteoplastic approach in chronic otitis media by means of a microsurgical reciprocating saw. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 3(4):515–520

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Abramovich S, Hannan SA, Huins CT et al (2008) Prospective cohort comparison of bioactive glass implants and conchal cartilage in reconstruction of the posterior canal wall during tympanomastoidectomy. Clin Otolaryngol 33(6):553–559

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Deveze A, Rameh C, Puchol MS, Lafont B, Lavieille JP, Magnan J (2010) Rehabilitation of canal wall down mastoidectomy using a titanium ear canal implant. Otol Neurotol 31(2):220–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Black B (2009) Use of titanium in repair of external auditory canal defects. Otol Neurotol 30(7):930–935

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tange RA (1988) The microsaw and fibrin sealant in middle ear surgery. Kugler, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  13. Claes J, Van de Heyning PH, Creten W et al (1990) Allograft tympanoplasty: predictive value of preoperative status. Laryngoscope 100(12):1313–1318

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. van Rompaey V, Vandamme W, Muylle L, van de Heyning PH (2012) Temporal bone bank: complying with European Union directives on human tissue and cells. Cell Tissue Bank 13(2):231–240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. van de Heyning PH, Claes J, Ars B et al (1991) Tympano-ossicular allografts following J. Marquet: the evaluation of a school. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 45(1):11–16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. de Foer B, Vercruysse JP, Bernaerts A et al (2008) Detection of postoperative residual cholesteatoma with non-echo-planar diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Otol Neurotol 29(4):513–517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dhepnorrarat RC, Wood B, Rajan GP (2009) Postoperative non-echo-planar diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging changes after cholesteatoma surgery: implications for cholesteatoma screening. Otol Neurotol 30(1):54–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of results of treatment of conductive hearing loss (1995) American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, Inc. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 113(3):186–187

  19. Gaillardin L (2012) Residual cholesteatoma: prevalence and location. Follow-up strategy in adults. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 129(3):136–140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Haginomori S, Takamaki A, Nonaka R et al (2008) Residual cholesteatoma: incidence and localization in canal wall down tympanoplasty with soft-wall reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 134:652–657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Barakate M, Bottril I (2008) Combined approach tympanoplasty for cholesteatoma: impact of middle ear cholesteatoma. J Laryngol Otol 122:120–124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hinohira Y, Yanahigara N, Gyo K (2007) Improvements to staged canal wall up tympanoplasty for middle ear cholesteatoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 137:913–917

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hamilton JW (2005) Efficacy of the KTP laser in the treatment of middle ear cholesteatoma. Otol Neurotol 26:135–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yung MW (2001) The use of middle ear endoscopy: has residual cholesteatoma been eliminated? J Laryngol Otol 115:958–961

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Thomassin JM, Braccini F (1999) Role of imaging and endoscopy in the follow up and management of cholesteatomas operated by closed technique. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol 120(2):75–81

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Stankovic MD (2008) Audiologic results of surgery for cholesteatoma: short- and long-term follow-up of influential factors. Otol Neurotol 29(7):933–940

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kronenberg J, Shapira Y, Migirov L (2012) Mastoidectomy reconstruction of the posterior wall and obliteration (MAPRO): preliminary results. Acta Otolaryngol 132(4):400–403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kupperman D, Tange R (2001) Ionomeric cement in the human middle ear cavity: long-term results of 23 cases. Laryngoscope 111(2):306–309

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dornhoffer J, Simmons O (2003) Canal wall reconstruction with Mimix hydroxyapatite cement: results in an animal model and case study. Laryngoscope 113(12):2123–2128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mercke U (1987) The cholesteatomatous ear one year after surgery with obliteration technique. Am J Otol 8(6):534–536

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Vercruysse JP, de Foer B, Somers T, Casselman JW, Offeciers E (2008) Mastoid and epitympanic bony obliteration in pediatric cholesteatoma. Otol Neurotol 29(7):953–960

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

None of the authors have financial interests in relation to this work. No financial support was provided toward the completion of this work.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen Van der Gucht.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van der Gucht, K., Van Rompaey, V., Vanderveken, O. et al. Temporary removal of the posterior bony canal wall with reconstruction using microplate osteosynthesis in cholesteatoma surgery: a case series and description of the technique. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 271, 1497–1503 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2601-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2601-2

Keywords

Navigation