Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Surgical margins in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: what is ‘close’?

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the definition of close margin in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), and its possible prognostic significance. An appropriate string was run on PubMed to retrieve articles discussing the ‘close’ surgical margin issue in HNSCC. A double cross-check was performed on citations and full-text articles retrieved. In total, 348 articles were identified. Further references were included by using the option “Titles in your search terms” option in PubMed. 15 papers were finally included for qualitative synthesis. In vocal cord surgery of HNSCC, a close margin could be considered to be ≤1 mm, in the larynx ≤5 mm, in the oral cavity ≤4 mm, and in the oropharynx ≤5 mm. In each patient, the choice of extent of close margin should be balanced against general condition, tumor stage, and functional issues to indicate appropriate adjuvant therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sessions DG, Lenox J, Spector GJ et al (2002) Management of T3N0M0 glottic carcinoma: therapeutic outcomes. Laryngoscope 112(7 Pt 1):1281–1288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ansarin M, Santoro L, Cattaneo A et al (2009) Laser surgery for early glottic cancer: impact of margin status on local control and organ preservation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 135(4):385–390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Loree TR, Strong EW (1990 ) Significance of positive margins in oral cavity squamous carcinoma. Am J Surg 160(4):410–414

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Spector GJ, Sessions DG, Lenox J, Newland D, Simpson J, Haughey BH (2004) Management of stage IV glottic carcinoma: therapeutic outcomes. Laryngoscope 114(8):1438–1446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hartl DM, de Mones E, Hans S, Janot F, Brasnu D (2007) Treatment of early-stage glottic cancer by transoral laser resection. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 116(11):832–836

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zelefsky MJ, Harrison LB, Fass DE et al (1990) Postoperative radiotherapy for oral cavity cancers: impact of anatomic subsite on treatment outcome. Head Neck 12(6):470–475

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dixit S, Vyas RK, Toparani RB, Baboo HA, Patel DD (1998) Surgery versus surgery and postoperative radiotherapy in squamous cell carcinoma of the buccal mucosa: a comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol 5(6):502–510

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Weijers M, Snow GB, Bezemer DP, van dr Wal JE, van der Waal I (2004) The status of the deep surgical margins in tongue and floor of mouth squamous cell carcinoma and risk of local recurrence; an analysis of 68 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 33(2):146–149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Liao CT, Huang SF, Chen IH et al (2008) When does skin excision allow the achievement of an adequate local control rate in patients with squamous cell carcinoma involving the buccal mucosa? Ann Surg Oncol 15(8):2187–2194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Liao CT, Chang JT, Wang HM et al (2008) Analysis of risk factors of predictive local tumor control in oral cavity cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 15(3):915–922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nason RW, Binahmed A, Pathak KA, Abdoh AA, Sándor GK (2009) What is the adequate margin of surgical resection in oral cancer? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 107(5):625–629

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zelefsky MJ, Harrison LB, Fass DE, Armstrong JG, Shah JP, Strong EW (1993) Postoperative radiation therapy for squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity and oropharynx: impact of therapy on patients with positive surgical margins. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 25(1):17–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sutton DN, Brown JS, Rogers SN, Vaughan ED, Woolgar JA (2003) The prognostic implications of the surgical margin in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 32(1):30–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. McMahon J, O’Brien CJ, Pathak I et al (2003) Influence of condition of surgical margins on local recurrence and disease-specific survival in oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41(4):224–231

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ravasz LA, Slootweg PJ, Hordijk GJ, Smit F, van der Tweel I (1991) The status of the resection margin as a prognostic factor in the treatment of head and neck carcinoma. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 19(7):314–318

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Looser KG, Shah JP, Strong EW (1978) The significance of “positive” margins in surgically resected epidermoid carcinomas. Head Neck Surg 1(2):107–111

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Byers RM, Bland KI, Borlase B, Luna M (1978) The prognostic and therapeutic value of frozen section determinations in the surgical treatment of squamous carcinoma of the head and neck. Am J Surg 136(4):525–528

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ho CM, Ng WF, Lam KH, Wei WI, Yuen AP (2002) Radial clearance in resection of hypopharyngeal cancer: an independent prognostic factor. Head Neck 24(2):181–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cooper JS, Porter K, Mallin K et al (2009) National Cancer Database report on cancer of the head and neck: 10-year update. Head Neck 31(6):748–758

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mistry RC, Qureshi SS, Kumaran C (2005) Post-resection mucosal margin shrinkage in oral cancer: quantification and significance. J Surg Oncol 91(2):131–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cheng A, Cox D, Schmidt BL (2008) Oral squamous cell carcinoma margin discrepancy after resection and pathologic processing. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 66(3):523–529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Freedman G, Fowble B, Hanlon A et al (1999) Patients with early stage invasive cancer with close or positive margins treated with conservative surgery and radiation have an increased risk of breast recurrence that is delayed by adjuvant systemic therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 44(5):1005–1015

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ryoo MC, Kagan AR, Wollin M et al (1989) Prognostic factors for recurrence and cosmesis in 393 patients after radiation therapy for early mammary carcinoma. Radiology 172(2):555–559

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Borger J, Kemperman H, Hart A, Peterse H, van Dongen J, Bartelink H (1994) Risk factors in breast-conservation therapy. J Clin Oncol 12(4):653–660

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pittinger TP, Maronian NC, Poulter CA, Peacock JL (1994) Importance of margin status in outcome of breast-conserving surgery for carcinoma. Surgery 116:605–609

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Slotman BJ, Meyer OWM, Njo KH, Karim AB (1994) Importance of timing of radiotherapy in breast conserving treatment for early stage breast cancer. Radiother Oncol 30(3):206–212

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Smitt MC, Nowels KW, Zdeblick MJ et al (1995) The importance of lumpectomy surgical margin status in long term results of breast conservation. Cancer 76(2):259–267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Bonali.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alicandri-Ciufelli, M., Bonali, M., Piccinini, A. et al. Surgical margins in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: what is ‘close’?. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270, 2603–2609 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2317-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2317-8

Keywords

Navigation