Skip to main content
Log in

Is there any predictor for tinnitus outcome in different types of otologic surgery?

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our objective was to determine the effect of different types of otologic surgeries on tinnitus symptoms. Our study consisted of 63 patients who were operated between January and June 2011. Variables such as age, sex, presence of systemic diseases, location and size of the perforation, duration of dry period, type of otological surgery, peroperative presence of cholesteatoma, timpanosclerotic plaques and ossicular chain discontinuity were evaluated. Audiologic evaluation by pure tone audiometry and assessment of THI scores were conducted before surgery and 12 weeks after surgery. There was a very significant difference between preoperative and postoperative mean THI scores (p < 0.01). There was no significant effect of presence of ossicular discontinuity, cholesteatoma, tympanosclerotic plaques, type of surgery or duration of symptoms on the difference of preoperative and postoperative THI scores (p > 0.05). There was a significant positive relationship between audiological gain and THI scores (r = 0.355, p < 0.01). In our study, we investigated the relationship between many types of otological surgeries including some preoperative and peroperative pathological findings and tinnitus. As a result, we found that postoperative audiologic gain is an important factor determining outcome of tinnitus in these types of otological surgeries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Henry JA, Dennis KC, Schechter MA (2005) General review of tinnitus: prevalence, mechanisms, effects, and management. J Speech Lang Hear Res 48:1204–1235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fornaro M, Martino M (2010) Tinnitus psychopharmacology: a comprehensive review of its pathomechanisms and management. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 24:209–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Crummer RW, Hassan GA (2004) Diagnostic approach to tinnitus. Am Fam Physician 69:120–126

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Del Bo L, Ambrosetti U (2007) Hearing aids for the treatment of tinnitus. Prog Brain Res 166:341–345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lim JJ, Lu PK, Koh DS, Eng SP (2010) Impact of tinnitus as measured by the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory among tinnitus sufferers in Singapore. Singapore Med J 51:551–557

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sweetow RW, Levy MC (1990) Tinnitus severity scaling for diagnostic/therapeutic usage. Hear Instrum 41:20–21

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kuk FK, Tyler RS, Russell D et al (1990) The psychometric properties of a tinnitus handicap questionnaire. Ear Hear 11:434–445

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Halford JB, Anderson SD (1991) Tinnitus severity measured by a subjective scale, audiometry and clinical judgement. J Laryngol Otol 105:89–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wilson PH, Henry J, Bowen M et al (1991) Tinnitus reaction questionnaire: psychometric properties of a measure of distress associated with tinnitus. J Speech Hear Res 34:197–201

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hallam RS (1996) Manual of the tinnitus questionnaire (TQ). Psychological Corporation, London

    Google Scholar 

  11. Newman CW, Jacobson GP, Spitzer JB (1996) Development of the tinnitus handicap ınventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 122:143–148

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Newman CW, Sandridge SA, Jacobson GP (1998) Psychometric adequacy of the tinnitus handicap ınventory (THI) for evaluating treatment outcome. J Am Acad Audiol 9:153–160

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lima Ada S, Sanchez TG, Bonadia Moraes MF et al (2007) The effect of timpanoplasty on tinnitus in patients with conductive hearing loss: a six month follow-up. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 73:384–389

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim DK, Park SN, Kim MJ et al (2011) Tinnitus in patients with chronic otitis media before and after middle ear surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268:1443–1448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schaette R, Turtle C, Munro KJ (2012) Reversible induction of phantom auditory sensations through simulated unilateral hearing loss. PLoS ONE 7(6):e35238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Baba S, Yagi T, Fujikura T (2004) Subjective evaluation and overall satisfaction after tympanoplasty for chronic simple suppurative otitis media. J Nihon Med Sch 71:17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Saito T, Kimura Y, Yamada T et al (1999) Efficacy of middle ear surgery for patients with hearing aids and middle ear disease. Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho 102:347–353

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sachio T, Hiroshi K, Chie K et al (1999) Tympanoplasty and tinnitus. Practica Otologica 92:845–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study was presented as a poster in 33.Turk National Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery congress.

Conflict of interest

We do not have any conflict or interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tulay Erden Habesoglu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Habesoglu, M., Habesoglu, T.E., Karatas, C. et al. Is there any predictor for tinnitus outcome in different types of otologic surgery?. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270, 2225–2229 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2271-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2271-5

Keywords

Navigation