Skip to main content
Log in

Intrinsic chemosensory signal recorded from the human nasal mucosa in patients with smell loss

  • Rhinology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Physiological investigation of olfactory receptor function in hyposmic or anosmic patients is rare. Pioneers examined the electro-olfactogram in patients with olfactory disturbance. Although the electro-olfactogram is an established method to record olfactory responses from human olfactory epithelium, the response is only measured at specific sites of the olfactory mucosa. In contrast to that the response of the olfactory epithelium to chemosensory stimuli can be studied in a specific nasal area by means of intrinsic optical signal recording. Five functionally anosmic patients were included in the present study. In all patients, responses could be obtained following trigeminal stimulation with CO2. In some patients, responses could be obtained after olfactory stimulation with H2S and PEA. The present data show that in the studied patients trigeminal function seems to be preserved, while it appears that in some patients olfactory function is preserved to a certain degree.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Doty RL, Brugger WE, Jurs PC, Orndorff MA, Snyder PJ, Lowry LD (1978) Intranasal trigeminal stimulation from odorous volatiles: psychometric responses from anosmic and normal humans. Physiol Behav 20:175–185

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Furukawa M, Kamide M, Miwa T, Umeda R (1988) Significance of intravenous olfaction test using thiamine propyldisulfide (Alinamin) in olfactometry. Auris Nasus Larynx 15:25–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hummel T, Knecht M, Kobal G (1996) Peripherally obtained electrophysiological responses to olfactory stimulation in man: electro-olfactograms exhibit a smaller degree of desensitization compared with subjective intensity estimates. Brain Res 717:160–164

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hummel T, Welge-Luessen A (2008) Erfassung des Riech- und Schmeckvermoegens. In: Hummel T, Welge-Luessen A (Eds) Riech- und Schmeckstoerungen. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 43–60

  5. Ishimaru T (2007) Optical recording of the intrinsic signal from the human olfactory cleft. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 116:335–341

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ishimaru T, Reden J, Krone F, Scheibe M (2007) Optical recordings from the human nasal mucosa in response to olfactory stimulation. Neurosci Lett 423:231–235

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ishimaru T, Scheibe M, Gudziol V, Negoias S (2008) Recordings of the optical intrinsic signal from the middle turbinate in response to olfactory and trigeminal stimulation: a pilot study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 265:781–785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ishimaru T, Reden J, Krone F, Scheibe M (2011) Topographical differences in the sensitivity of the human nasal mucosa to olfactory and trigeminal stimuli. Neurosci Lett 493:136–139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kent PF, Mozell MM (1992) The recording of odorant-induced mucosal activity patterns with a voltage-sensitive dye. J Neurophysiol 68:1804–1819

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kobal G, Hummel T (1992) Olfactory evoked potential activity and hedonics. In: Van TS, Dodd GH (eds) Fragrance: the psychology and biology of perfume. Elsevier Applied Science, London, pp 175–194

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kobal G, Klimek L, Wolfensberger M, Gudziol H, Temmel A, Owen CM, Seeber H, Pauli E, Hummel T 2000 Multicenter investigation of 1,036 subjects using a standardized method for the assessment of olfactory function combining tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 257:205–211

  12. Kobal G 2003 Electrophysiological measurement of olfactory function. In: Doty RL (ed) Handbook of olfaction and gustation, 2nd edn. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 229–249

  13. Leopold DA, Hummel T, Schwob JE, Hong SC, Knecht M, Kobal G (2000) Anterior distribution of human olfactory epithelium. Laryngoscope 110:417–421

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mackay-Sim A, Kesteven S (1994) Topographic patterns of responsiveness to odorants in the rat olfactory epithelium. J Neurophysiol 71:150–160

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Miwa T, Moriizumi T, Horikawa I, Uramoto N, Ishimaru T, Nishimura T, Furukawa M (2002) Role of nerve growth factor in the olfactory system. Microsc Res Tech 58:197–203

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Takagi SF 1989 A standardized venous olfactory test. In: Takagi SF (ed) Human olfaction, University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, pp 56–58

  17. Yamagishi M, Okazoe R, Ishizuka Y (1994) Olfactory mucosa of patients with olfactory disturbance following head trauma. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 103:279–284

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None of the authors declared a financial interest in the current experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tadashi Ishimaru.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ishimaru, T., Krone, F., Scheibe, M. et al. Intrinsic chemosensory signal recorded from the human nasal mucosa in patients with smell loss. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270, 1335–1338 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2203-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2203-4

Keywords

Navigation