Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does lack of glottic closure affect quality of life as a cause of constipation in laryngectomized patients?

  • Laryngology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The permanent disappearance of glottic closure eventually causes inadequate defecatory propulsion resulting in functional constipation. The aim of this study is to reveal functional constipation probably induced by lack of glottic closure in laryngectomized patients. The study was conducted in a prospective, tertiary care center. Forty patients who had undergone total laryngectomy (study group) and 30 who had undergone microlaryngoscopic surgery (control group) were evaluated. Based on the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life Questionnaires C30, the presence of functional constipation was investigated using the Rome II diagnostic criteria and was confirmed by measurement of colonic transit time using a radiopaque marker test. Functional constipation and colonic transit time were found to be increased and statistically significant in laryngectomized patients (70 %) compared with the control group (26 %) (p < 0.01). Functional constipation is more prevalent among laryngectomized patients. When evaluating quality of life of patients undergoing laryngectomy, colorectal functions must be taken into consideration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nalbadian M, Nikolaou A, Nikolaidis V, Petridis D, Themelis C, Daniilidis I (2001) Factors influencing quality of life in laryngectomized patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 258(7):336–340

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Risberg-Berlin B, Rydén A, Möller RY, Finizia C (2009) Effects of total laryngectomy on olfactory function, health-related quality of life, and communication: a 3-year follow-up study. BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord 29(9):8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Babin E, Blanchard D, Hitier M (2011) Management of total laryngectomy patients over time: from the consultation announcing the diagnosis to long term follow-up. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268(10):1407–1419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sherwood L (2008) The Digestive System. In: Sherwood L (ed) Human physiology: from cells to systems, 7th edn. Brooks Cole, Belmont, pp 589–640

    Google Scholar 

  5. Op de Coul BM, Ackerstaff AH, Van As CJ, van den Hoogen FJ, Meeuwis CA, Manni JJ, Hilgers FJ (2005) Quality of life assessment in laryngectomized individuals: do we need additions to standard questionnaires in specific clinical research projects? Clin Otolaryngol 30:169–175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Welge-Luessen A, Kobal G, Wolfensberger M (2000) Assessing olfactory function in laryngectomees using the Sniffin’Sticks test battery and chemosensory evoked potentials. Laryngoscope 110:303–307

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B et al (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality of life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:365–376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bjordal K, Ahlner EM, Tolleson E et al (1994) Development of a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaire module to be used in quality of life assessments in head and neck cancer. Acta Oncol 33:879–885

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sherman AC, Simonton S, Adams DC, Vural E, Owens B, Hanna E (2000) Assessing quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer. Cross validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Head and Neck module (QLQ-H&N35). Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126:459–467

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Müller R, Paneff J, Köllner V, Koch R (2001) Quality of life of patients with laryngeal carcinoma: a post-treatment study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 258(6):276–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Abendstein H, Nordgren M, Boysen M et al (2005) Quality of life and head and neck cancer: a 5 year prospective study. Laryngoscope 115:2183–2192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Drossman DA (2006) The functional gastrointestinal disorders and the Rome III process. Gastroenterology 130:1377–1390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Suares NC, Ac Ford (2011) Prevalance of, and risk factors for, chronic idiopathic constipation in the community: systematic review and meta-amalysis. Am J Gastroenterol 106:1582–1591

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bjordal K, Hammerlid E, Ahlner EM et al (1999) Quality of life in head and neck patients: validation of the EORTC H&N35. J Clin Oncol 17:1008–1019

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lindberg G, Hamid SS, Malfertheiner P et al (2011) World Gastroenterology Organisation. World Gastroenterology Organisation global guideline: constipation—a global perspective. J Clin Gastroenterol 45:483–487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Higgins PD, Johanson JF (2004) Epidemiology of constipation in North America: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 99:750–759

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kasap E, Bor S (2006) Fonksiyonel barsak hastalıgi prevelansi. Guncel Gastroenteroloji 10(2):165–168

    Google Scholar 

  18. Solomon R, Cherny NI (2006) Constipation and diarrhea in patients with cancer. Cancer J 12:355–364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Curtis EB, Krech R, Walsh TD (1991) Common symptoms in patients with advanced cancer. J Palliat Care 7:25–29

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sanchez MI, Bercik P (2011) Epidemiology and burden of chronic constipation. Can J Gastroenterol 25 Suppl B:11–15

    Google Scholar 

  21. McPhee S, Papadakis M, Rabow MW (2011) 2012 Current medical diagnosis and treatment. Mc Graw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Birkhaug EJ, Aarstad HJ, Aarstad AK, Olofsson J (2002) Relation between mood, social support and the quality of life in patients with laryngectomies. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 259(4):197–204

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript warrant that there is no conflict of interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seher Sirin Ugur.

Additional information

The work was done at Sisli Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Otorhinolaryngology Department, Istanbul, Turkey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ugur, S.S., Yuksel, S., Coskun, B.U. et al. Does lack of glottic closure affect quality of life as a cause of constipation in laryngectomized patients?. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270, 629–634 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2176-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2176-3

Keywords

Navigation