Skip to main content
Log in

Prognostic significance of nodal ratio in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The TNM classification is not specific for head and neck skin cancer and makes no allowance for disease extent. Studies have shown that the relative number of metastatic-to-examined lymph nodes, termed the Nodal ratio, is a reliable independent prognosticator in several types of cancer. The study was designed as a retrospective analysis in a university affiliated tertiary care center setting. The files of all patients (n = 71) with cutaneous head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and regional lymph node metastasis who attended a tertiary medical center between 1990 and 2008 were reviewed for clinical variables and outcome, and Nodal ratio was calculated. Data were analyzed for impact on survival. On multivariate analysis Nodal ratio and age were found to be significant predictors of overall survival. The N-ratio was the only significant predictor of disease-specific survival. Age, type of treatment (selective/modified neck dissection), pathologic N stage, and radiotherapy had no effect. The Nodal ratio is a potentially valuable prognostic index in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. The minimal number of nodes that need to be excised has to be determined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Christenson LJ, Borrowman TA, Vachon CM et al (2005) Incidence of basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas in a population younger than 40 years. JAMA 294:681–690

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Boeta-Angeles L, Bennett RG (1998) Features associated with recurrence (basal cell carcinoma). In: Miller SJ, Maloney ME, (eds) Cutaneous oncology: pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. Blackwell Science, Malden, p 646–656

  3. Clayman GL, Lee JJ, Holsinger FC, Zhou X (2005) Mortality risk from squamous cell skin cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:759–765

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Swanson NA, Johnson TM (1998) Management of basal and squamous cell carcinoma. In: Cummings C (ed) Otolaryngology head and neck surgery. Mosby Yearbook, New York, pp 486–501

    Google Scholar 

  5. Martin H, Strong E, Spiro RH (1970) Radiation-induced skin cancer of the head. Cancer 25:61–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gupta AK, Cardella CJ, Haberman HF (1986) Cutaneous malignant neoplasms in patients with renal transplants. Arch Dermatol 122:1288–1293

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rowe DE, Carroll RJ, Day CL Jr (1992) Prognostic factors for local recurrence, metastasis, and survival rates in squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, ear, and lip. Implications for treatment modality selection. J Am Acad Dermatol 26:976–990

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Laramore GE, Scott CB, al-Sarraf M (1992) Adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck: report on intergroup study 0034. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 23:705–713

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Veness MJ, Palme CE, Morgan GJ (2006) High-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: results from 266 treated patients with metastatic lymph node disease. Cancer 106:2389–2966

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Palme CE, MacKay SG, Kalnins I, Morgan GJ, Veness MJ (2007) The need for a better prognostic staging system in patients with metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 15:103–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Andruchow JL, Veness MJ, Morgan GJ et al (2006) Implications for clinical staging of metastatic cutaneous squamous carcinoma of the head and neck based on a multicenter study of treatment outcomes. Cancer 106:1078–1083

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Moore BA, Weber RS, Prieto V et al (2005) Lymph node metastases from cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Laryngoscope 115:1561–1567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rossi CR, Mocellin S, Pasquali S, Pilati P, Nitti D (2008) N-ratio: a novel independent prognostic factor for patients with stage-III cutaneous melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 15:310–3105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Marchet A, Mocellin S, Ambrosi A, Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer Study (GIRCG) et al (2008) The prognostic value of N-ratio in patients with gastric cancer: validation in a large, multicenter series. Eur J Surg Oncol 34:159–165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Woodward WA, Vinh-Hung V, Ueno NT et al (2006) Prognostic value of nodal ratios in node-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:2910–2916

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kuru B (2006) Prognostic significance of total number of nodes removed, negative nodes removed, and ratio of positive nodes to removed nodes in node positive breast carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 32:1082–1088

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Berger AC, Watson JC, Ross EA, Hoffman JP (2004) The metastatic/examined lymph node ratio is an important prognostic factor after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am Surg 70:235–240

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nitti D, Marchet A, Olivieri M et al (2003) Ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes is an independent prognostic factor after D2 resection for gastric cancer: analysis of a large European monoinstitutional experience. Ann Surg Oncol 10:1077–1085

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Marchet A, Mocellin S, Ambrosi A et al (2007) The ratio between metastatic and examined nodes (N ratio) is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer regardless the type of lymphadenectomy. Results from an Italian multicentric study in 1,853 patients. Ann Surg 245:543–552

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lehmann EL, Romano JP (2005) Testing statistical hypotheses, 3rd edn. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bhattacharyya N (1998) The effects of more conservative neck dissections and radiotherapy on nodal yields from the neck. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 124:412–416

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Köhler HF, Kowalski LP (2010) How many nodes are needed to stage a neck? A critical appraisal. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267:785–791

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sobin LH, Wittekind CH (1997) International Union Against Cancer (UICC). TNM classification of malignant tumors, 5th edn. Wiley, New York

  24. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID et al (2002) AJCC cancer staging manual, 6th edn. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chen SL, Bilchik AJ (2006) More extensive nodal dissection improves survival for stages I to III of colon cancer: a population-based study. Ann Surg 244:602–610

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Joseph NE, Sigurdson ER, Hanlon AL et al (2003) Accuracy of determining nodal negativity in colorectal cancer on the basis of the number of nodes retrieved on resection. Ann Surg Oncol 10:213–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Le Voyer TE, Sigurdson ER, Hanlon AL et al (2003) Colon cancer survival is associated with increasing number of lymph nodes analyzed: a secondary survey of intergroup trial INT-0089. J Clin Oncol 21:2912–2919

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gil Z, Carlson DL, Boyle JO, Kraus DH (2009) Lymph node density is a significant predictor of outcome in patients with oral cancer. Cancer 115:5700–5710

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Shrime MG, Bachar G, Lea J et al (2009) Nodal ratio as an independent predictor of survival in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Head Neck 31(11):1482–1488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. de Manzoni G, Verlato G, Roviello F et al (2002) The new TNM classification of lymph node metastasis minimises stage migration problems in gastric cancer patients. Br J Cancer 87:171–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Vinh-Hung V, Vershraegen C, Promish DI et al (2004) Ratios of involved nodes in early breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 6:680–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Truong PT, Berthelet E, Lee L et al (2005) The prognostic significance of the percentage of positive/dissected axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer recurrence and survival in patients with one to three positive axillary lymph. Cancer 103:2006–2014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aviram Mizrachi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mizrachi, A., Hadar, T., Rabinovics, N. et al. Prognostic significance of nodal ratio in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270, 647–653 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2050-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2050-3

Keywords

Navigation